数字病理学是提供头颈部病理咨询的快速有效平台。

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
American Journal of Surgical Pathology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1097/PAS.0000000000002239
Bella L Liu, Mehrvash Haghighi, William H Westra
{"title":"数字病理学是提供头颈部病理咨询的快速有效平台。","authors":"Bella L Liu, Mehrvash Haghighi, William H Westra","doi":"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical pathology of the head and neck is one of the more challenging areas in all of diagnostic pathology. Its unparalleled diversity and complexity renders it highly vulnerable to diagnostic error compelling unconstrained access to specialized diagnostic expertise. Digital pathology (DP) is a state-of-the-art tool that could facilitate access to specialized expertise, but it is relatively untested in the context of pathology consultations. In a collaboration between Labcorp Dianon and a large academic hospital with subspecialized surgical pathology, DP was implemented to provide the pathology community access to head and neck pathology expertise. From this collaborative experience, glass slides from consecutive consult cases that had been previously diagnosed using DP were reviewed by an expert consultant in a blinded manner following an extended wash-out period. The intraobserver discrepancy rate was recorded. Major discrepancies were defined as those resulting in significant impact on clinical management and/or prognosis, whereas minor discrepancies were those with no impact on care or prognosis. Slides from 57 cases were available for review. The average wash-out period was 19 months. Five discrepancies were recorded (intraobserver concordance rate of 91%). All discrepancies were minor (major discrepancy rate, 0%; minor discrepancy rate, 9%). On appraisal of the discrepant cases, discordant diagnoses were attributed to subjective differences in interpretation rather than objective differences related to the inferiority of DP. DP decreased the median turnaround time by 97% (from 70 h 26 min to 2 h 25 min). DP provides efficient and fast access to expert consultants. The speed of case delivery does not compromise diagnostic precision. Discrepancies are uncommon, minor, and reflect subjective interpretative differences inherent to difficult and ambiguous head and neck cases, and not the inferiority of DP as a diagnostic platform. High concordance can be achieved even for those difficult and complex cases that are concentrated in the consultation practice. This observation carries profound implications regarding universal health care access to specialized diagnostic expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":7772,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"985-990"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Pathology is a Fast and Effective Platform for Providing Head and Neck Pathology Consultations.\",\"authors\":\"Bella L Liu, Mehrvash Haghighi, William H Westra\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Surgical pathology of the head and neck is one of the more challenging areas in all of diagnostic pathology. Its unparalleled diversity and complexity renders it highly vulnerable to diagnostic error compelling unconstrained access to specialized diagnostic expertise. Digital pathology (DP) is a state-of-the-art tool that could facilitate access to specialized expertise, but it is relatively untested in the context of pathology consultations. In a collaboration between Labcorp Dianon and a large academic hospital with subspecialized surgical pathology, DP was implemented to provide the pathology community access to head and neck pathology expertise. From this collaborative experience, glass slides from consecutive consult cases that had been previously diagnosed using DP were reviewed by an expert consultant in a blinded manner following an extended wash-out period. The intraobserver discrepancy rate was recorded. Major discrepancies were defined as those resulting in significant impact on clinical management and/or prognosis, whereas minor discrepancies were those with no impact on care or prognosis. Slides from 57 cases were available for review. The average wash-out period was 19 months. Five discrepancies were recorded (intraobserver concordance rate of 91%). All discrepancies were minor (major discrepancy rate, 0%; minor discrepancy rate, 9%). On appraisal of the discrepant cases, discordant diagnoses were attributed to subjective differences in interpretation rather than objective differences related to the inferiority of DP. DP decreased the median turnaround time by 97% (from 70 h 26 min to 2 h 25 min). DP provides efficient and fast access to expert consultants. The speed of case delivery does not compromise diagnostic precision. Discrepancies are uncommon, minor, and reflect subjective interpretative differences inherent to difficult and ambiguous head and neck cases, and not the inferiority of DP as a diagnostic platform. High concordance can be achieved even for those difficult and complex cases that are concentrated in the consultation practice. This observation carries profound implications regarding universal health care access to specialized diagnostic expertise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"985-990\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002239\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002239","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

头颈部手术病理是病理诊断中最具挑战性的领域之一。其无与伦比的多样性和复杂性使其非常容易出现诊断错误,这迫使人们必须不受限制地获得专业的诊断知识。数字病理学(Digital pathology,DP)是一种最先进的工具,它可以促进对专业知识的获取,但在病理会诊中还相对缺乏测试。在 Labcorp Dianon 与一家拥有外科病理亚专业的大型学术医院的合作中,DP 的实施为病理界提供了获取头颈部病理专业知识的途径。根据这一合作经验,专家顾问在经过一段较长的冲洗期后,以盲法对先前使用 DP 诊断的连续会诊病例的玻璃切片进行了复查。记录了观察者内部的差异率。重大差异是指对临床管理和/或预后产生重大影响的差异,而轻微差异是指对护理或预后没有影响的差异。57 个病例的切片可供审查。平均清洗期为 19 个月。共记录到五处差异(观察者内部一致率为 91%)。所有差异均为轻微差异(重大差异率为 0%;轻微差异率为 9%)。在对存在差异的病例进行评估时,不一致的诊断归因于解释上的主观差异,而不是与 DP 的劣势有关的客观差异。DP 将中位周转时间缩短了 97%(从 70 小时 26 分钟缩短到 2 小时 25 分钟)。DP 提供了高效、快速的专家顾问服务。病例交付速度不会影响诊断的精确性。差异并不常见,而且很小,反映了头颈部疑难和模糊病例固有的主观解释差异,而不是 DP 作为诊断平台的劣势。即使是那些集中在会诊实践中的疑难复杂病例,也能达到很高的一致性。这一观察结果对普及专业诊断知识具有深远的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital Pathology is a Fast and Effective Platform for Providing Head and Neck Pathology Consultations.

Surgical pathology of the head and neck is one of the more challenging areas in all of diagnostic pathology. Its unparalleled diversity and complexity renders it highly vulnerable to diagnostic error compelling unconstrained access to specialized diagnostic expertise. Digital pathology (DP) is a state-of-the-art tool that could facilitate access to specialized expertise, but it is relatively untested in the context of pathology consultations. In a collaboration between Labcorp Dianon and a large academic hospital with subspecialized surgical pathology, DP was implemented to provide the pathology community access to head and neck pathology expertise. From this collaborative experience, glass slides from consecutive consult cases that had been previously diagnosed using DP were reviewed by an expert consultant in a blinded manner following an extended wash-out period. The intraobserver discrepancy rate was recorded. Major discrepancies were defined as those resulting in significant impact on clinical management and/or prognosis, whereas minor discrepancies were those with no impact on care or prognosis. Slides from 57 cases were available for review. The average wash-out period was 19 months. Five discrepancies were recorded (intraobserver concordance rate of 91%). All discrepancies were minor (major discrepancy rate, 0%; minor discrepancy rate, 9%). On appraisal of the discrepant cases, discordant diagnoses were attributed to subjective differences in interpretation rather than objective differences related to the inferiority of DP. DP decreased the median turnaround time by 97% (from 70 h 26 min to 2 h 25 min). DP provides efficient and fast access to expert consultants. The speed of case delivery does not compromise diagnostic precision. Discrepancies are uncommon, minor, and reflect subjective interpretative differences inherent to difficult and ambiguous head and neck cases, and not the inferiority of DP as a diagnostic platform. High concordance can be achieved even for those difficult and complex cases that are concentrated in the consultation practice. This observation carries profound implications regarding universal health care access to specialized diagnostic expertise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgical Pathology has achieved worldwide recognition for its outstanding coverage of the state of the art in human surgical pathology. In each monthly issue, experts present original articles, review articles, detailed case reports, and special features, enhanced by superb illustrations. Coverage encompasses technical methods, diagnostic aids, and frozen-section diagnosis, in addition to detailed pathologic studies of a wide range of disease entities. Official Journal of The Arthur Purdy Stout Society of Surgical Pathologists and The Gastrointestinal Pathology Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信