使用双能量计算机断层扫描计算的 Hounsfield 单位变化:双层、双源和快速千伏开关技术的比较。

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiological Physics and Technology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1007/s12194-024-00802-0
Shingo Ohira, Junji Mochizuki, Tatsunori Niwa, Kazuyuki Endo, Masanari Minamitani, Hideomi Yamashita, Atsuto Katano, Toshikazu Imae, Teiji Nishio, Masahiko Koizumi, Keiichi Nakagawa
{"title":"使用双能量计算机断层扫描计算的 Hounsfield 单位变化:双层、双源和快速千伏开关技术的比较。","authors":"Shingo Ohira, Junji Mochizuki, Tatsunori Niwa, Kazuyuki Endo, Masanari Minamitani, Hideomi Yamashita, Atsuto Katano, Toshikazu Imae, Teiji Nishio, Masahiko Koizumi, Keiichi Nakagawa","doi":"10.1007/s12194-024-00802-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the study is to investigate the variation in Hounsfield unit (HU) values calculated using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) scanners. A tissue characterization phantom inserting 16 reference materials were scanned three times using DECT scanners [dual-layer CT (DLCT), dual-source CT (DSCT), and fast kilovoltage switching CT (FKSCT)] changing scanning conditions. The single-energy CT images (120 or 140 kVp), and virtual monochromatic images at 70 keV (VMI<sub>70</sub>) and 140 keV (VMI<sub>140</sub>) were reconstructed, and the HU values of each reference material were measured. The difference in HU values was larger when the phantom was scanned using the half dose with wrapping with rubber (strong beam-hardening effect) compared with the full dose without the rubber (reference condition), and the difference was larger as the electron density increased. For SECT, the difference in HU values against the reference condition measured by the DSCT (3.2 ± 5.0 HU) was significantly smaller (p < 0.05) than that using DLCT with 120 kVp (22.4 ± 23.8 HU), DLCT with 140 kVp (11.4 ± 12.8 HU), and FKSCT (13.4 ± 14.3 HU). The respective difference in HU values in the VMI<sub>70</sub> and VMI<sub>140</sub> measured using the DSCT (10.8 ± 17.1 and 3.5 ± 4.1 HU) and FKSCT (11.5 ± 21.8 and 5.5 ± 10.4 HU) were significantly smaller than those measured using the DLCT<sub>120</sub> (23.1 ± 27.5 and 12.4 ± 9.4 HU) and DLCT<sub>140</sub> (22.3 ± 28.6 and 13.1 ± 11.4 HU). The HU values and the susceptibility to beam-hardening effects varied widely depending on the DECT scanners.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11128400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in Hounsfield unit calculated using dual-energy computed tomography: comparison of dual-layer, dual-source, and fast kilovoltage switching technique.\",\"authors\":\"Shingo Ohira, Junji Mochizuki, Tatsunori Niwa, Kazuyuki Endo, Masanari Minamitani, Hideomi Yamashita, Atsuto Katano, Toshikazu Imae, Teiji Nishio, Masahiko Koizumi, Keiichi Nakagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12194-024-00802-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of the study is to investigate the variation in Hounsfield unit (HU) values calculated using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) scanners. A tissue characterization phantom inserting 16 reference materials were scanned three times using DECT scanners [dual-layer CT (DLCT), dual-source CT (DSCT), and fast kilovoltage switching CT (FKSCT)] changing scanning conditions. The single-energy CT images (120 or 140 kVp), and virtual monochromatic images at 70 keV (VMI<sub>70</sub>) and 140 keV (VMI<sub>140</sub>) were reconstructed, and the HU values of each reference material were measured. The difference in HU values was larger when the phantom was scanned using the half dose with wrapping with rubber (strong beam-hardening effect) compared with the full dose without the rubber (reference condition), and the difference was larger as the electron density increased. For SECT, the difference in HU values against the reference condition measured by the DSCT (3.2 ± 5.0 HU) was significantly smaller (p < 0.05) than that using DLCT with 120 kVp (22.4 ± 23.8 HU), DLCT with 140 kVp (11.4 ± 12.8 HU), and FKSCT (13.4 ± 14.3 HU). The respective difference in HU values in the VMI<sub>70</sub> and VMI<sub>140</sub> measured using the DSCT (10.8 ± 17.1 and 3.5 ± 4.1 HU) and FKSCT (11.5 ± 21.8 and 5.5 ± 10.4 HU) were significantly smaller than those measured using the DLCT<sub>120</sub> (23.1 ± 27.5 and 12.4 ± 9.4 HU) and DLCT<sub>140</sub> (22.3 ± 28.6 and 13.1 ± 11.4 HU). The HU values and the susceptibility to beam-hardening effects varied widely depending on the DECT scanners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11128400/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00802-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00802-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的目的是调查使用双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)计算出的 Hounsfield 单位(HU)值的变化。使用 DECT 扫描仪[双层 CT (DLCT)、双源 CT (DSCT) 和快速千伏切换 CT (FKSCT)]改变扫描条件,对插入 16 种参考材料的组织表征模型进行了三次扫描。重建单能 CT 图像(120 或 140 kVp)以及 70 keV(VMI70)和 140 keV(VMI140)的虚拟单色图像,并测量每种参考材料的 HU 值。与不使用橡胶的全剂量扫描(参考条件)相比,使用包裹橡胶的半剂量扫描模型(强束流硬化效应)时,HU 值的差异更大,而且随着电子密度的增加,差异也更大。对于 SECT,使用 DSCT 测量的 HU 值(3.2 ± 5.0 HU)与参考条件的差异明显较小(p 70),而使用 DSCT 测量的 VMI140 值(10.8 ± 17.1 和 3.5 ± 4.1 HU)和 FKSCT(11.5 ± 21.8 和 5.5 ± 10.4 HU)明显小于 DLCT120(23.1 ± 27.5 和 12.4 ± 9.4 HU)和 DLCT140(22.3 ± 28.6 和 13.1 ± 11.4 HU)。不同 DECT 扫描仪的 HU 值和对光束硬化效应的敏感性差异很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation in Hounsfield unit calculated using dual-energy computed tomography: comparison of dual-layer, dual-source, and fast kilovoltage switching technique.

The purpose of the study is to investigate the variation in Hounsfield unit (HU) values calculated using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) scanners. A tissue characterization phantom inserting 16 reference materials were scanned three times using DECT scanners [dual-layer CT (DLCT), dual-source CT (DSCT), and fast kilovoltage switching CT (FKSCT)] changing scanning conditions. The single-energy CT images (120 or 140 kVp), and virtual monochromatic images at 70 keV (VMI70) and 140 keV (VMI140) were reconstructed, and the HU values of each reference material were measured. The difference in HU values was larger when the phantom was scanned using the half dose with wrapping with rubber (strong beam-hardening effect) compared with the full dose without the rubber (reference condition), and the difference was larger as the electron density increased. For SECT, the difference in HU values against the reference condition measured by the DSCT (3.2 ± 5.0 HU) was significantly smaller (p < 0.05) than that using DLCT with 120 kVp (22.4 ± 23.8 HU), DLCT with 140 kVp (11.4 ± 12.8 HU), and FKSCT (13.4 ± 14.3 HU). The respective difference in HU values in the VMI70 and VMI140 measured using the DSCT (10.8 ± 17.1 and 3.5 ± 4.1 HU) and FKSCT (11.5 ± 21.8 and 5.5 ± 10.4 HU) were significantly smaller than those measured using the DLCT120 (23.1 ± 27.5 and 12.4 ± 9.4 HU) and DLCT140 (22.3 ± 28.6 and 13.1 ± 11.4 HU). The HU values and the susceptibility to beam-hardening effects varied widely depending on the DECT scanners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信