Annu Choudhary, Swati Singh, Swati Singh, Faseehullah Alam, Harsh Kumar
{"title":"双谱指数引导下比较右美托咪定和芬太尼作为异丙酚的辅助剂,以达到气管插管的适当深度 - 一项双盲随机对照试验。","authors":"Annu Choudhary, Swati Singh, Swati Singh, Faseehullah Alam, Harsh Kumar","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_884_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation require an adequate depth of anaesthesia. The study's primary objective was to compare the time needed to achieve the bispectral index (BIS)-guided adequate depth of anaesthesia for endotracheal intubation using fentanyl and dexmedetomidine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After institutional ethics committee clearance and written informed consent, this randomised study was conducted on 140 patients of either gender between 18 and 60 years who were scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomised to intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (Group D) or fentanyl 2 μg/kg (Group F). The drugs were given as an intravenous infusion over 10 min before induction of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the time required to achieve BIS 50. Normally distributed variables were compared using Student's <i>t-</i>test, and non-normally distributed variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Qualitative data were analysed using Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A <i>P</i> value <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time to achieve BIS 50 was lesser in Group F, 1546 (27) as compared to Group D, 1558 (11) s [mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI) 12[5.11, 18.89]), <i>P</i> < 0.001]. Haemodynamic parameters were comparable at all time points between both the groups, except heart rate, which was significantly lower. Propofol consumption was significantly less in group D than in group F [125.9 (25.36) versus 157.3 (42.80) mg, respectively, mean difference (95% CI) 31.4 (-44.16 to -20.63) <i>P</i> < 0.001)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexmedetomidine achieves BIS 50 faster and has a propofol-sparing effect as compared to fentanyl.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10993930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bispectral index-guided comparison of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant with propofol to achieve an adequate depth for endotracheal intubation - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Annu Choudhary, Swati Singh, Swati Singh, Faseehullah Alam, Harsh Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_884_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation require an adequate depth of anaesthesia. The study's primary objective was to compare the time needed to achieve the bispectral index (BIS)-guided adequate depth of anaesthesia for endotracheal intubation using fentanyl and dexmedetomidine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After institutional ethics committee clearance and written informed consent, this randomised study was conducted on 140 patients of either gender between 18 and 60 years who were scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomised to intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (Group D) or fentanyl 2 μg/kg (Group F). The drugs were given as an intravenous infusion over 10 min before induction of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the time required to achieve BIS 50. Normally distributed variables were compared using Student's <i>t-</i>test, and non-normally distributed variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Qualitative data were analysed using Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A <i>P</i> value <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time to achieve BIS 50 was lesser in Group F, 1546 (27) as compared to Group D, 1558 (11) s [mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI) 12[5.11, 18.89]), <i>P</i> < 0.001]. Haemodynamic parameters were comparable at all time points between both the groups, except heart rate, which was significantly lower. Propofol consumption was significantly less in group D than in group F [125.9 (25.36) versus 157.3 (42.80) mg, respectively, mean difference (95% CI) 31.4 (-44.16 to -20.63) <i>P</i> < 0.001)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexmedetomidine achieves BIS 50 faster and has a propofol-sparing effect as compared to fentanyl.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10993930/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_884_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_884_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:喉镜检查和气管插管需要足够的麻醉深度。研究的主要目的是比较使用芬太尼和右美托咪定在双频谱指数(BIS)指导下达到气管插管足够麻醉深度所需的时间:在获得机构伦理委员会批准和书面知情同意后,本随机研究对 140 名年龄在 18 岁至 60 岁之间、计划在全身麻醉下进行择期手术的男女患者进行了研究。患者被随机分配到静脉注射右美托咪定 1 μg/kg(D 组)或芬太尼 2 μg/kg(F 组)。这些药物在麻醉诱导前 10 分钟静脉注射。主要结果是达到 BIS 50 所需的时间。正态分布变量的比较采用学生 t 检验,非正态分布变量的比较采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验。定性数据采用卡方/费舍尔精确检验进行分析。A P 值 结果:F 组达到 BIS 50 的时间为 1546(27)秒,D 组为 1558(11)秒[平均差异(95% 置信区间(CI)12[5.11, 18.89]),P <0.001]。两组在所有时间点的血流动力学参数相当,但心率明显较低。D组的丙泊酚用量明显少于F组[分别为125.9(25.36)毫克和157.3(42.80)毫克,平均差异(95% CI)为31.4(-44.16至-20.63),P < 0.001]:结论:与芬太尼相比,右美托咪定能更快达到 BIS 50,并具有节省异丙酚的效果。
Bispectral index-guided comparison of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant with propofol to achieve an adequate depth for endotracheal intubation - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.
Background and aims: Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation require an adequate depth of anaesthesia. The study's primary objective was to compare the time needed to achieve the bispectral index (BIS)-guided adequate depth of anaesthesia for endotracheal intubation using fentanyl and dexmedetomidine.
Methods: After institutional ethics committee clearance and written informed consent, this randomised study was conducted on 140 patients of either gender between 18 and 60 years who were scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomised to intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (Group D) or fentanyl 2 μg/kg (Group F). The drugs were given as an intravenous infusion over 10 min before induction of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was the time required to achieve BIS 50. Normally distributed variables were compared using Student's t-test, and non-normally distributed variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Qualitative data were analysed using Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The time to achieve BIS 50 was lesser in Group F, 1546 (27) as compared to Group D, 1558 (11) s [mean difference (95% confidence interval (CI) 12[5.11, 18.89]), P < 0.001]. Haemodynamic parameters were comparable at all time points between both the groups, except heart rate, which was significantly lower. Propofol consumption was significantly less in group D than in group F [125.9 (25.36) versus 157.3 (42.80) mg, respectively, mean difference (95% CI) 31.4 (-44.16 to -20.63) P < 0.001)].
Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine achieves BIS 50 faster and has a propofol-sparing effect as compared to fentanyl.