综合数学方法(IMAS):在有限剂量条件下预测化学品皮肤吸收率的新方法。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Ryoki Kunita, Takafumi Nishijima, Hiroaki Todo, Masaaki Miyazawa
{"title":"综合数学方法(IMAS):在有限剂量条件下预测化学品皮肤吸收率的新方法。","authors":"Ryoki Kunita, Takafumi Nishijima, Hiroaki Todo, Masaaki Miyazawa","doi":"10.2131/jts.49.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative structure permeation relationship (QSPR) models have gained prominence in recent years owing to their capacity to elucidate the influence of physicochemical properties on the dermal absorption of chemicals. These models facilitate the prediction of permeation coefficient (Kp) values, indicating the skin permeability of a chemical under infinite dose conditions. Conversely, obtaining dermal absorption rates (DAs) under finite dose conditions, which are crucial for skin product safety evaluation, remains a challenge when relying solely on Kp predictions from QSPR models. One proposed resolution involves using Kroes' methodology, categorizing DAs based on Kp values; however, refinement becomes necessary owing to discreteness in the obtained values. We previously developed a mathematical model using Kp values obtained from in vitro dermal absorption tests to predict DAs. The present study introduces a new methodology, Integrating Mathematical Approaches (IMAS), which combines QSPR models and our mathematical model to predict DAs for risk assessments without conducting in vitro dermal absorption tests. Regarding 40 chemicals (76.1 ≤ MW ≤ 220; -1.4 ≤ Log K<sub>o/w</sub> ≤ 3.1), IMAS showed that 65.0% (26/40) predictions of DA values were accurate to within twofold of the observed values in finite dose experiments. Compared to Kroes' methodology, IMAS notably mitigated overestimation, particularly for hydrophilic chemicals with water solubility exceeding 57.0 mg/cm<sup>3</sup>. These findings highlight the value of IMAS as a tool for skin product risk assessments, particularly for hydrophilic compounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":17654,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicological Sciences","volume":"49 5","pages":"219-230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating mathematical approaches (IMAS): Novel methodology for predicting dermal absorption rates of chemicals under finite dose conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Ryoki Kunita, Takafumi Nishijima, Hiroaki Todo, Masaaki Miyazawa\",\"doi\":\"10.2131/jts.49.219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quantitative structure permeation relationship (QSPR) models have gained prominence in recent years owing to their capacity to elucidate the influence of physicochemical properties on the dermal absorption of chemicals. These models facilitate the prediction of permeation coefficient (Kp) values, indicating the skin permeability of a chemical under infinite dose conditions. Conversely, obtaining dermal absorption rates (DAs) under finite dose conditions, which are crucial for skin product safety evaluation, remains a challenge when relying solely on Kp predictions from QSPR models. One proposed resolution involves using Kroes' methodology, categorizing DAs based on Kp values; however, refinement becomes necessary owing to discreteness in the obtained values. We previously developed a mathematical model using Kp values obtained from in vitro dermal absorption tests to predict DAs. The present study introduces a new methodology, Integrating Mathematical Approaches (IMAS), which combines QSPR models and our mathematical model to predict DAs for risk assessments without conducting in vitro dermal absorption tests. Regarding 40 chemicals (76.1 ≤ MW ≤ 220; -1.4 ≤ Log K<sub>o/w</sub> ≤ 3.1), IMAS showed that 65.0% (26/40) predictions of DA values were accurate to within twofold of the observed values in finite dose experiments. Compared to Kroes' methodology, IMAS notably mitigated overestimation, particularly for hydrophilic chemicals with water solubility exceeding 57.0 mg/cm<sup>3</sup>. These findings highlight the value of IMAS as a tool for skin product risk assessments, particularly for hydrophilic compounds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Toxicological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"49 5\",\"pages\":\"219-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Toxicological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.49.219\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.49.219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定量结构渗透关系(QSPR)模型能够阐明理化性质对化学品皮肤吸收的影响,因此近年来越来越受到重视。这些模型有助于预测渗透系数(Kp)值,表明化学品在无限剂量条件下的皮肤渗透性。相反,在有限剂量条件下获得皮肤吸收率(DAs)对皮肤产品安全评估至关重要,但仅靠 QSPR 模型预测 Kp 值仍是一项挑战。一种建议的解决方法是使用 Kroes 的方法,根据 Kp 值对 DAs 进行分类;然而,由于所获得的值存在离散性,因此有必要对其进行细化。我们曾利用体外皮肤吸收试验获得的 Kp 值建立了一个数学模型,用于预测 DAs。本研究引入了一种新的方法--数学方法整合(IMAS),它结合了 QSPR 模型和我们的数学模型,在不进行体外皮肤吸收试验的情况下预测风险评估中的 DAs。对于 40 种化学品(76.1 ≤ MW ≤ 220;-1.4 ≤ Log Ko/w ≤ 3.1),IMAS 显示 65.0% (26/40)的 DA 值预测准确度在有限剂量实验观察值的两倍以内。与 Kroes 的方法相比,IMAS 显著减少了高估,特别是对于水溶性超过 57.0 mg/cm3 的亲水性化学品。这些发现凸显了 IMAS 作为皮肤产品风险评估工具的价值,特别是对于亲水性化合物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating mathematical approaches (IMAS): Novel methodology for predicting dermal absorption rates of chemicals under finite dose conditions.

Quantitative structure permeation relationship (QSPR) models have gained prominence in recent years owing to their capacity to elucidate the influence of physicochemical properties on the dermal absorption of chemicals. These models facilitate the prediction of permeation coefficient (Kp) values, indicating the skin permeability of a chemical under infinite dose conditions. Conversely, obtaining dermal absorption rates (DAs) under finite dose conditions, which are crucial for skin product safety evaluation, remains a challenge when relying solely on Kp predictions from QSPR models. One proposed resolution involves using Kroes' methodology, categorizing DAs based on Kp values; however, refinement becomes necessary owing to discreteness in the obtained values. We previously developed a mathematical model using Kp values obtained from in vitro dermal absorption tests to predict DAs. The present study introduces a new methodology, Integrating Mathematical Approaches (IMAS), which combines QSPR models and our mathematical model to predict DAs for risk assessments without conducting in vitro dermal absorption tests. Regarding 40 chemicals (76.1 ≤ MW ≤ 220; -1.4 ≤ Log Ko/w ≤ 3.1), IMAS showed that 65.0% (26/40) predictions of DA values were accurate to within twofold of the observed values in finite dose experiments. Compared to Kroes' methodology, IMAS notably mitigated overestimation, particularly for hydrophilic chemicals with water solubility exceeding 57.0 mg/cm3. These findings highlight the value of IMAS as a tool for skin product risk assessments, particularly for hydrophilic compounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Toxicological Sciences (J. Toxicol. Sci.) is a scientific journal that publishes research about the mechanisms and significance of the toxicity of substances, such as drugs, food additives, food contaminants and environmental pollutants. Papers on the toxicities and effects of extracts and mixtures containing unidentified compounds cannot be accepted as a general rule.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信