胆囊疾病患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹手术疗效比较的系统性回顾和荟萃分析》(A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy compared to the Open Procedure in Patients with Gallbladder Disease)。
{"title":"胆囊疾病患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹手术疗效比较的系统性回顾和荟萃分析》(A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy compared to the Open Procedure in Patients with Gallbladder Disease)。","authors":"Debajit Kumar Roy, Rahaman Sheikh","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1777710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Conflicting evidence regarding the laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy outcomes in scientific literature impacts the medical decision-making for patients with gallbladder disease. This study aimed to compare a range of primary and secondary outcomes between patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy and those with open intervention. <b>Methods</b> Articles published from 1993 to 2023 were explored by utilizing advanced filters of PubMed Central/Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, JSTOR, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and EBSCO. The gallbladder disease was determined by the presence of one or more of the following conditions: 1) Gangrenous cholecystitis, 2) acute cholecystitis, 3) chronic gallbladder diseases, and 4) cholelithiasis. The primary end-point was mortality, while the secondary outcome included (1) bile leakage, 2) common bile duct injury, 3) gangrene, 4) hospital stay (days), 5) major complications, 6) median hospital stay (days), (7) pneumonia, 8) sick leaves (days), and 9) wound infection. <b>Results</b> Statistically significant reductions were observed in mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30, 0.45, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), mean hospital stay duration (mean difference: -2.68, 95% CI: -3.66, -1.70, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), major complications (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.64, <i>p</i> = 0.0005), post/intraoperative wound infection (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.51, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and sick leaves (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.80, <i>p</i> = 0.01) in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with those with the open intervention. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the study groups for bile leakage, common bile duct injury, gangrene, median hospital stay days, and pneumonia ( <i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b> The pooled outcomes favored the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the open procedure in patients with gallbladder disease. The consolidated findings indicate the higher impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in improving patient outcomes, including safety episodes, compared with open cholecystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":32889,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","volume":"14 1","pages":"3-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to the Open Procedure in Patients with Gallbladder Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Debajit Kumar Roy, Rahaman Sheikh\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1777710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> Conflicting evidence regarding the laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy outcomes in scientific literature impacts the medical decision-making for patients with gallbladder disease. This study aimed to compare a range of primary and secondary outcomes between patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy and those with open intervention. <b>Methods</b> Articles published from 1993 to 2023 were explored by utilizing advanced filters of PubMed Central/Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, JSTOR, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and EBSCO. The gallbladder disease was determined by the presence of one or more of the following conditions: 1) Gangrenous cholecystitis, 2) acute cholecystitis, 3) chronic gallbladder diseases, and 4) cholelithiasis. The primary end-point was mortality, while the secondary outcome included (1) bile leakage, 2) common bile duct injury, 3) gangrene, 4) hospital stay (days), 5) major complications, 6) median hospital stay (days), (7) pneumonia, 8) sick leaves (days), and 9) wound infection. <b>Results</b> Statistically significant reductions were observed in mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30, 0.45, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), mean hospital stay duration (mean difference: -2.68, 95% CI: -3.66, -1.70, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), major complications (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.64, <i>p</i> = 0.0005), post/intraoperative wound infection (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.51, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and sick leaves (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.80, <i>p</i> = 0.01) in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with those with the open intervention. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the study groups for bile leakage, common bile duct injury, gangrene, median hospital stay days, and pneumonia ( <i>p</i> > 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b> The pooled outcomes favored the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the open procedure in patients with gallbladder disease. The consolidated findings indicate the higher impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in improving patient outcomes, including safety episodes, compared with open cholecystectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avicenna Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"3-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11057899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avicenna Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景 科学文献中关于腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术结果的证据相互矛盾,影响了胆囊疾病患者的医疗决策。本研究旨在比较接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术患者的一系列主要和次要结果。方法 通过使用 PubMed Central/Medline、Web of Science、CINAHL、JSTOR、Cochrane Library、Scopus 和 EBSCO 的高级过滤器,对 1993 年至 2023 年间发表的文章进行了研究。胆囊疾病的判定标准是存在以下一种或多种情况:1)坏疽性胆囊炎;2)急性胆囊炎;3)慢性胆囊疾病;4)胆石症。主要终点是死亡率,次要终点包括:(1) 胆漏;(2) 胆总管损伤;(3) 坏疽;(4) 住院时间(天数);(5) 主要并发症;(6) 中位住院时间(天数);(7) 肺炎;(8) 病假(天数);(9) 伤口感染。结果 观察到死亡率有明显降低(几率比 [OR]:0.30,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.30, 0.45, p p = 0.0005)、术后/术中伤口感染(OR:0.29,95% 置信区间[CI]:0.16, 0.51, p p = 0.01)。研究组之间在胆漏、胆总管损伤、坏疽、中位住院天数和肺炎方面没有统计学差异(P > 0.05)。结论 在胆囊疾病患者中,腹腔镜胆囊切除术优于开腹手术。综合结果表明,与开腹胆囊切除术相比,腹腔镜胆囊切除术对改善患者预后(包括安全事件)的影响更大。
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to the Open Procedure in Patients with Gallbladder Disease.
Background Conflicting evidence regarding the laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy outcomes in scientific literature impacts the medical decision-making for patients with gallbladder disease. This study aimed to compare a range of primary and secondary outcomes between patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy and those with open intervention. Methods Articles published from 1993 to 2023 were explored by utilizing advanced filters of PubMed Central/Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL, JSTOR, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and EBSCO. The gallbladder disease was determined by the presence of one or more of the following conditions: 1) Gangrenous cholecystitis, 2) acute cholecystitis, 3) chronic gallbladder diseases, and 4) cholelithiasis. The primary end-point was mortality, while the secondary outcome included (1) bile leakage, 2) common bile duct injury, 3) gangrene, 4) hospital stay (days), 5) major complications, 6) median hospital stay (days), (7) pneumonia, 8) sick leaves (days), and 9) wound infection. Results Statistically significant reductions were observed in mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30, 0.45, p < 0.00001), mean hospital stay duration (mean difference: -2.68, 95% CI: -3.66, -1.70, p < 0.00001), major complications (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.64, p = 0.0005), post/intraoperative wound infection (OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.51, p < 0.0001), and sick leaves (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.80, p = 0.01) in patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared with those with the open intervention. No statistically significant differences were recorded between the study groups for bile leakage, common bile duct injury, gangrene, median hospital stay days, and pneumonia ( p > 0.05). Conclusions The pooled outcomes favored the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the open procedure in patients with gallbladder disease. The consolidated findings indicate the higher impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in improving patient outcomes, including safety episodes, compared with open cholecystectomy.