Frederick North, Rebecca Buss, Elissa M Nelson, Matthew C Thompson, Jennifer Pecina, Gregory M Garrison, Brian A Crum
{"title":"大型多专科多地点诊所的自我预约:对多种自主预约就诊类型的回顾性纵向研究。","authors":"Frederick North, Rebecca Buss, Elissa M Nelson, Matthew C Thompson, Jennifer Pecina, Gregory M Garrison, Brian A Crum","doi":"10.1177/23333928241249521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-scheduling of medical visits is becoming available at many medical institutions. We aimed to examine the self-scheduled visit counts and rate of growth of self-scheduled visits in a multispecialty practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For 85 weeks extending from January 1, 2022 through August 24, 2023, we examined self-scheduled visit counts for over 1500 self-scheduled visit types. We compared completed self-scheduled visit counts to all scheduled completed visit counts for the same visit types. We collected counts of the most frequently self-scheduled visit types for each week and examined the change over time. We also determined the proportion that each visit type was self-scheduled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 20,769 699 completed visits during the course of the study that met the criteria for inclusion. Self-scheduled visits accounted for 4.0% of all completed visits (838 592/20,769 699). Over the 85-week span, self-scheduled visits rose from 3.0% to 5.3% of the total. There were 1887 unique visit types that were associated with completed visits. There were just 6 appointment visit types of the total 1887 self-scheduled visit types that accounted for 50.7% of the total 838 592 self-scheduled visits. Those 6 visit types were a lab blood test visit (19.5%, 163 K visits), two Family Medicine office visit types (13.0%, 109 K visits), a screening mammogram visit type (6.6%, 55 K visits), a scheduled express care visit type (6%, 50 K visits) and a COVID immunization visit type (5.7%, 48 K visits). Twenty-one visit types that were self-scheduled accounted for 75% of the total self-scheduled visits. Four seasonal visits, accounting for 10.6% of the total self-scheduled visits, were responsible for almost all the non-linear change in self-scheduling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-scheduling accounted for a small but growing percent of all outpatient scheduled visits in a multispecialty, multisite practice. A wide range of visit types can be successfully self-scheduled.</p>","PeriodicalId":12951,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","volume":"11 ","pages":"23333928241249521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11064750/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-scheduling in a Large Multispecialty and Multisite Clinic: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Examination of Multiple Self-Scheduled Visit Types.\",\"authors\":\"Frederick North, Rebecca Buss, Elissa M Nelson, Matthew C Thompson, Jennifer Pecina, Gregory M Garrison, Brian A Crum\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23333928241249521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-scheduling of medical visits is becoming available at many medical institutions. We aimed to examine the self-scheduled visit counts and rate of growth of self-scheduled visits in a multispecialty practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For 85 weeks extending from January 1, 2022 through August 24, 2023, we examined self-scheduled visit counts for over 1500 self-scheduled visit types. We compared completed self-scheduled visit counts to all scheduled completed visit counts for the same visit types. We collected counts of the most frequently self-scheduled visit types for each week and examined the change over time. We also determined the proportion that each visit type was self-scheduled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 20,769 699 completed visits during the course of the study that met the criteria for inclusion. Self-scheduled visits accounted for 4.0% of all completed visits (838 592/20,769 699). Over the 85-week span, self-scheduled visits rose from 3.0% to 5.3% of the total. There were 1887 unique visit types that were associated with completed visits. There were just 6 appointment visit types of the total 1887 self-scheduled visit types that accounted for 50.7% of the total 838 592 self-scheduled visits. Those 6 visit types were a lab blood test visit (19.5%, 163 K visits), two Family Medicine office visit types (13.0%, 109 K visits), a screening mammogram visit type (6.6%, 55 K visits), a scheduled express care visit type (6%, 50 K visits) and a COVID immunization visit type (5.7%, 48 K visits). Twenty-one visit types that were self-scheduled accounted for 75% of the total self-scheduled visits. Four seasonal visits, accounting for 10.6% of the total self-scheduled visits, were responsible for almost all the non-linear change in self-scheduling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-scheduling accounted for a small but growing percent of all outpatient scheduled visits in a multispecialty, multisite practice. A wide range of visit types can be successfully self-scheduled.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"23333928241249521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11064750/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928241249521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928241249521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景介绍许多医疗机构都开始提供自主预约就诊服务。我们的目的是研究一个多专科诊所的自行安排就诊次数和自行安排就诊的增长率:从 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 8 月 24 日的 85 周内,我们对超过 1500 种自行安排就诊类型的自行安排就诊次数进行了检查。我们将已完成的自主预约就诊次数与相同就诊类型的所有已完成预约就诊次数进行了比较。我们收集了每周最常见的自行安排的访问类型的计数,并研究了其随时间的变化。我们还确定了每种访问类型中自行安排访问的比例:在研究过程中,共有 20,769,699 人完成了符合纳入标准的访问。自行安排的就诊占所有完成就诊的 4.0%(838 592/20769 699)。在 85 周的时间跨度内,自行安排的就诊次数占总就诊次数的比例从 3.0% 上升到 5.3%。与完成就诊相关的独特就诊类型有 1887 种。在总共 1887 种自行安排的就诊类型中,仅有 6 种预约就诊类型占到了总共 838 592 次自行安排就诊的 50.7%。这 6 种就诊类型分别是血液化验就诊类型(19.5%,163 K 人次)、两种家庭医学门诊就诊类型(13.0%,109 K 人次)、一种乳房 X 光筛查就诊类型(6.6%,55 K 人次)、一种预约快速护理就诊类型(6%,50 K 人次)和一种 COVID 免疫接种就诊类型(5.7%,48 K 人次)。自行安排的 21 种就诊类型占自行安排就诊总数的 75%。四种季节性就诊占自我安排就诊总数的 10.6%,几乎是自我安排就诊非线性变化的全部原因:结论:在一个多专科、多地点的诊所中,自行排班就诊占所有门诊排班就诊的比例很小,但却在不断增长。各种类型的门诊都可以成功地自行排期。
Self-scheduling in a Large Multispecialty and Multisite Clinic: A Retrospective, Longitudinal Examination of Multiple Self-Scheduled Visit Types.
Background: Self-scheduling of medical visits is becoming available at many medical institutions. We aimed to examine the self-scheduled visit counts and rate of growth of self-scheduled visits in a multispecialty practice.
Methods: For 85 weeks extending from January 1, 2022 through August 24, 2023, we examined self-scheduled visit counts for over 1500 self-scheduled visit types. We compared completed self-scheduled visit counts to all scheduled completed visit counts for the same visit types. We collected counts of the most frequently self-scheduled visit types for each week and examined the change over time. We also determined the proportion that each visit type was self-scheduled.
Results: There were 20,769 699 completed visits during the course of the study that met the criteria for inclusion. Self-scheduled visits accounted for 4.0% of all completed visits (838 592/20,769 699). Over the 85-week span, self-scheduled visits rose from 3.0% to 5.3% of the total. There were 1887 unique visit types that were associated with completed visits. There were just 6 appointment visit types of the total 1887 self-scheduled visit types that accounted for 50.7% of the total 838 592 self-scheduled visits. Those 6 visit types were a lab blood test visit (19.5%, 163 K visits), two Family Medicine office visit types (13.0%, 109 K visits), a screening mammogram visit type (6.6%, 55 K visits), a scheduled express care visit type (6%, 50 K visits) and a COVID immunization visit type (5.7%, 48 K visits). Twenty-one visit types that were self-scheduled accounted for 75% of the total self-scheduled visits. Four seasonal visits, accounting for 10.6% of the total self-scheduled visits, were responsible for almost all the non-linear change in self-scheduling.
Conclusion: Self-scheduling accounted for a small but growing percent of all outpatient scheduled visits in a multispecialty, multisite practice. A wide range of visit types can be successfully self-scheduled.