军事医疗系统面临的内部威胁:对 TRICARE West 提供者的系统背景调查。

JMIRx med Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.2196/52198
David Bychkov
{"title":"军事医疗系统面临的内部威胁:对 TRICARE West 提供者的系统背景调查。","authors":"David Bychkov","doi":"10.2196/52198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To address the pandemic, the Defense Health Agency (DHA) expanded its TRICARE civilian provider network by 30.1%. In 2022, the DHA Annual Report stated that TRICARE's provider directories were only 80% accurate. Unlike Medicare, the DHA does not publicly reveal National Provider Identification (NPI) numbers. As a result, TRICARE's 9.6 million beneficiaries lack the means to verify their doctor's credentials. Since 2013, the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) has excluded 17,706 physicians and other providers from federal health programs due to billing fraud, neglect, drug-related convictions, and other offenses. These providers and their NPIs are included on the OIG's List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (LEIE). Patients who receive care from excluded providers face higher risks of hospitalization and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to assess the extent to which TRICARE screens health care provider names on their referral website against criminal databases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 1-31, 2023, we used TRICARE West's provider directory to search for all providers within a 5-mile radius of 798 zip codes (38 per state, ≥10,000 residents each, randomly entered). We then copied and pasted all directory results' first and last names, business names, addresses, phone numbers, fax numbers, degree types, practice specialties, and active or closed statuses into a CSV file. We cross-referenced the search results against US and state databases for medical and criminal misconduct, including the OIG-LEIE and General Services Administration's (GSA) SAM.gov exclusion lists, the HHS Office of Civil Rights Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) breach reports, 15 available state Medicaid exclusion lists (state), the International Trade Administration's Consolidated Screening List (CSL), 3 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) debarment lists, the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) list of January 6 federal defendants, and the OIG-HHS list of fugitives (FUG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our provider search yielded 111,619 raw results; 54 zip codes contained no data. After removing 72,156 (64.65%) duplicate entries, closed offices, and non-TRICARE West locations, we identified 39,463 active provider names. Within this baseline sample group, there were 2398 (6.08%) total matches against all exclusion and sanction databases, including 2197 on the OIG-LEIE, 2311 on the GSA-SAM.gov list, 2 on the HIPAA list, 54 on the state Medicaid exclusion lists, 69 on the CSL, 3 on the FDA lists, 53 on the FBI list, and 10 on the FUG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TRICARE's civilian provider roster merits further scrutiny by law enforcement. Following the National Institute of Standards and Technology 800, the DHA can mitigate privacy, safety, and security clearance threats by implementing an insider threat management model, robust enforcement of the False Claims Act, and mandatory security risk assessments. These are the views of the author, not the Department of Defense or the US government.</p>","PeriodicalId":73558,"journal":{"name":"JMIRx med","volume":"5 ","pages":"e52198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11024397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insider Threats to the Military Health System: A Systematic Background Check of TRICARE West Providers.\",\"authors\":\"David Bychkov\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/52198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To address the pandemic, the Defense Health Agency (DHA) expanded its TRICARE civilian provider network by 30.1%. In 2022, the DHA Annual Report stated that TRICARE's provider directories were only 80% accurate. Unlike Medicare, the DHA does not publicly reveal National Provider Identification (NPI) numbers. As a result, TRICARE's 9.6 million beneficiaries lack the means to verify their doctor's credentials. Since 2013, the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) has excluded 17,706 physicians and other providers from federal health programs due to billing fraud, neglect, drug-related convictions, and other offenses. These providers and their NPIs are included on the OIG's List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (LEIE). Patients who receive care from excluded providers face higher risks of hospitalization and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to assess the extent to which TRICARE screens health care provider names on their referral website against criminal databases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 1-31, 2023, we used TRICARE West's provider directory to search for all providers within a 5-mile radius of 798 zip codes (38 per state, ≥10,000 residents each, randomly entered). We then copied and pasted all directory results' first and last names, business names, addresses, phone numbers, fax numbers, degree types, practice specialties, and active or closed statuses into a CSV file. We cross-referenced the search results against US and state databases for medical and criminal misconduct, including the OIG-LEIE and General Services Administration's (GSA) SAM.gov exclusion lists, the HHS Office of Civil Rights Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) breach reports, 15 available state Medicaid exclusion lists (state), the International Trade Administration's Consolidated Screening List (CSL), 3 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) debarment lists, the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) list of January 6 federal defendants, and the OIG-HHS list of fugitives (FUG).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our provider search yielded 111,619 raw results; 54 zip codes contained no data. After removing 72,156 (64.65%) duplicate entries, closed offices, and non-TRICARE West locations, we identified 39,463 active provider names. Within this baseline sample group, there were 2398 (6.08%) total matches against all exclusion and sanction databases, including 2197 on the OIG-LEIE, 2311 on the GSA-SAM.gov list, 2 on the HIPAA list, 54 on the state Medicaid exclusion lists, 69 on the CSL, 3 on the FDA lists, 53 on the FBI list, and 10 on the FUG.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TRICARE's civilian provider roster merits further scrutiny by law enforcement. Following the National Institute of Standards and Technology 800, the DHA can mitigate privacy, safety, and security clearance threats by implementing an insider threat management model, robust enforcement of the False Claims Act, and mandatory security risk assessments. These are the views of the author, not the Department of Defense or the US government.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIRx med\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"e52198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11024397/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIRx med\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/52198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIRx med","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/52198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为应对大流行病,国防卫生局(DHA)将其 TRICARE 民用医疗服务提供者网络扩大了 30.1%。2022 年,DHA 年度报告指出,TRICARE 提供商目录的准确率仅为 80%。与医疗保险不同,DHA 并不公开全国医疗服务提供者标识(NPI)号码。因此,TRICARE 的 960 万受益人无法核实医生的资质。自 2013 年以来,美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)监察长办公室(OIG)已将 17706 名医生和其他医疗服务提供者排除在联邦医疗计划之外,原因是他们存在账单欺诈、疏忽、与药物相关的定罪以及其他违法行为。这些医疗服务提供者及其 NPI 已被列入 OIG 的 "除外个人和实体名单"(LEIE)。接受排除在外的医疗服务提供者提供的医疗服务的患者面临较高的住院和死亡风险:我们试图评估 TRICARE 根据犯罪数据库对其转介网站上的医疗服务提供者姓名进行筛查的程度:2023 年 1 月 1-31 日期间,我们使用 TRICARE West 的医疗服务提供者目录搜索了 798 个邮政编码(每个州 38 个,每个邮政编码≥10,000 名居民,随机输入)5 英里半径范围内的所有医疗服务提供者。然后,我们将所有目录结果中的姓和名、公司名称、地址、电话号码、传真号码、学位类型、执业专业以及活跃或关闭状态复制并粘贴到 CSV 文件中。我们将搜索结果与美国和各州的医疗和刑事不当行为数据库进行了交叉比对,包括 OIG-LEIE 和总务管理局 (GSA) 的 SAM.gov 排除名单、HHS 民权办公室健康保险可携性和责任法案 (HIPAA) 违规报告、15 个可用的州医疗补助排除名单(州)、国际贸易管理局综合筛选名单 (CSL)、3 个食品药品管理局 (FDA) 除名名单、联邦调查局 (FBI) 1 月 6 日联邦被告名单以及 OIG-HHS 逃犯名单 (FUG):我们对提供商的搜索产生了 111,619 个原始结果,其中 54 个邮政编码没有数据。在剔除 72,156 个(64.65%)重复条目、关闭的办事处和非 TTRICARE West 的地点后,我们确定了 39,463 个活跃的医疗服务提供者名称。在该基线样本组中,共有 2398 个(6.08%)与所有排除和制裁数据库匹配,其中包括 OIG-LEIE 名单上的 2197 个、GSA-SAM.gov 名单上的 2311 个、HIPAA 名单上的 2 个、州医疗补助排除名单上的 54 个、CSL 名单上的 69 个、FDA 名单上的 3 个、FBI 名单上的 53 个和 FUG.Conclusions 名单上的 10 个:结论:TRICARE 的民间医疗服务提供者名册值得执法部门进一步审查。按照国家标准与技术研究院 800 号文件的要求,DHA 可以通过实施内部威胁管理模式、严格执行《虚假索赔法》和强制性安全风险评估来减少隐私、安全和安全审查威胁。本文仅代表作者个人观点,与国防部或美国政府无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insider Threats to the Military Health System: A Systematic Background Check of TRICARE West Providers.

Background: To address the pandemic, the Defense Health Agency (DHA) expanded its TRICARE civilian provider network by 30.1%. In 2022, the DHA Annual Report stated that TRICARE's provider directories were only 80% accurate. Unlike Medicare, the DHA does not publicly reveal National Provider Identification (NPI) numbers. As a result, TRICARE's 9.6 million beneficiaries lack the means to verify their doctor's credentials. Since 2013, the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) has excluded 17,706 physicians and other providers from federal health programs due to billing fraud, neglect, drug-related convictions, and other offenses. These providers and their NPIs are included on the OIG's List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (LEIE). Patients who receive care from excluded providers face higher risks of hospitalization and mortality.

Objective: We sought to assess the extent to which TRICARE screens health care provider names on their referral website against criminal databases.

Methods: Between January 1-31, 2023, we used TRICARE West's provider directory to search for all providers within a 5-mile radius of 798 zip codes (38 per state, ≥10,000 residents each, randomly entered). We then copied and pasted all directory results' first and last names, business names, addresses, phone numbers, fax numbers, degree types, practice specialties, and active or closed statuses into a CSV file. We cross-referenced the search results against US and state databases for medical and criminal misconduct, including the OIG-LEIE and General Services Administration's (GSA) SAM.gov exclusion lists, the HHS Office of Civil Rights Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) breach reports, 15 available state Medicaid exclusion lists (state), the International Trade Administration's Consolidated Screening List (CSL), 3 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) debarment lists, the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) list of January 6 federal defendants, and the OIG-HHS list of fugitives (FUG).

Results: Our provider search yielded 111,619 raw results; 54 zip codes contained no data. After removing 72,156 (64.65%) duplicate entries, closed offices, and non-TRICARE West locations, we identified 39,463 active provider names. Within this baseline sample group, there were 2398 (6.08%) total matches against all exclusion and sanction databases, including 2197 on the OIG-LEIE, 2311 on the GSA-SAM.gov list, 2 on the HIPAA list, 54 on the state Medicaid exclusion lists, 69 on the CSL, 3 on the FDA lists, 53 on the FBI list, and 10 on the FUG.

Conclusions: TRICARE's civilian provider roster merits further scrutiny by law enforcement. Following the National Institute of Standards and Technology 800, the DHA can mitigate privacy, safety, and security clearance threats by implementing an insider threat management model, robust enforcement of the False Claims Act, and mandatory security risk assessments. These are the views of the author, not the Department of Defense or the US government.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信