"陷入对方的陷阱":医生与制药业之间与激励挂钩的处方交易的长期因素》。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mishal Sameer Khan, Afifah Rahman-Shepherd, Muhammad Naveed Noor, Amna Rehana Siddiqui, Catherine Goodman, Virginia Wiseman, Afshan Khurshid Isani, Wafa Aftab, Sabeen Sharif, Sadia Shakoor, Sameen Siddiqi, Rumina Hasan
{"title":"\"陷入对方的陷阱\":医生与制药业之间与激励挂钩的处方交易的长期因素》。","authors":"Mishal Sameer Khan, Afifah Rahman-Shepherd, Muhammad Naveed Noor, Amna Rehana Siddiqui, Catherine Goodman, Virginia Wiseman, Afshan Khurshid Isani, Wafa Aftab, Sabeen Sharif, Sadia Shakoor, Sameen Siddiqi, Rumina Hasan","doi":"10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite known adverse impacts on patients and health systems, \"incentive-linked prescribing,\" which describes the prescribing of medicines that result in personal benefits for the prescriber, remains a widespread and hidden impediment to quality of healthcare. We investigated factors perpetuating incentive-linked prescribing among primary care physicians in for-profit practices (referred to as private doctors - PDs), using Pakistan as a case study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our mixed-methods study synthesised insights from a survey of 419 systematically sampled PDs and 68 semi-structured interviews with PDs (n=28), pharmaceutical sales representatives (SRs) (n=12), and provincial and national policy actors (n=28). For the survey, we built a verified database of all registered PDs within Karachi, Pakistan's most populous city, administered an electronic questionnaire in-person and descriptively analysed the data. Semi-structured interviews incorporated a vignette-based exercise and data was analysed using an interpretive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our survey showed that 90% of PDs met pharmaceutical SRs weekly. Three interlinked factors perpetuating incentive-linked prescribing we identified were: gaps in understanding of conflicts of interest and loss of values among doctors; financial pressures on doctors operating in a (largely) privately financed health-system, exacerbated by competition with unqualified healthcare providers; and aggressive incentivisation by pharmaceutical companies, linked to low political will to regulate an over-saturated pharmaceutical market.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regular interactions between pharmaceutical companies and PDs are normalised in our study setting. Progress on regulating these is hindered by the substantial role of incentive-linked prescribing in the financial success of physicians and pharmaceutical industry employees. A first step towards addressing the entrenchment of incentive-linked prescribing may be to reduce opposition to restrictions on incentivisation of physicians from stakeholders within the pharmaceutical industry, physicians themselves, and policy-makers concerned about curtailing growth of the pharmaceutical industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":14135,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","volume":" ","pages":"8213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Caught in Each Other's Traps\\\": Factors Perpetuating Incentive-Linked Prescribing Deals Between Physicians and the Pharmaceutical Industry.\",\"authors\":\"Mishal Sameer Khan, Afifah Rahman-Shepherd, Muhammad Naveed Noor, Amna Rehana Siddiqui, Catherine Goodman, Virginia Wiseman, Afshan Khurshid Isani, Wafa Aftab, Sabeen Sharif, Sadia Shakoor, Sameen Siddiqi, Rumina Hasan\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite known adverse impacts on patients and health systems, \\\"incentive-linked prescribing,\\\" which describes the prescribing of medicines that result in personal benefits for the prescriber, remains a widespread and hidden impediment to quality of healthcare. We investigated factors perpetuating incentive-linked prescribing among primary care physicians in for-profit practices (referred to as private doctors - PDs), using Pakistan as a case study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our mixed-methods study synthesised insights from a survey of 419 systematically sampled PDs and 68 semi-structured interviews with PDs (n=28), pharmaceutical sales representatives (SRs) (n=12), and provincial and national policy actors (n=28). For the survey, we built a verified database of all registered PDs within Karachi, Pakistan's most populous city, administered an electronic questionnaire in-person and descriptively analysed the data. Semi-structured interviews incorporated a vignette-based exercise and data was analysed using an interpretive approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our survey showed that 90% of PDs met pharmaceutical SRs weekly. Three interlinked factors perpetuating incentive-linked prescribing we identified were: gaps in understanding of conflicts of interest and loss of values among doctors; financial pressures on doctors operating in a (largely) privately financed health-system, exacerbated by competition with unqualified healthcare providers; and aggressive incentivisation by pharmaceutical companies, linked to low political will to regulate an over-saturated pharmaceutical market.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regular interactions between pharmaceutical companies and PDs are normalised in our study setting. Progress on regulating these is hindered by the substantial role of incentive-linked prescribing in the financial success of physicians and pharmaceutical industry employees. A first step towards addressing the entrenchment of incentive-linked prescribing may be to reduce opposition to restrictions on incentivisation of physicians from stakeholders within the pharmaceutical industry, physicians themselves, and policy-makers concerned about curtailing growth of the pharmaceutical industry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Policy and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270611/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Policy and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8213\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与激励挂钩的处方 "是指为处方者个人利益开具处方的行为,尽管已知会对患者和医疗系统造成不利影响,但它仍然是医疗质量的一个普遍而隐蔽的障碍。我们以巴基斯坦为例,调查了营利性诊所的初级保健医生(被称为私人医生)中与激励挂钩的处方长期存在的因素:我们的混合方法研究综合了对 419 名系统抽样私家医生的调查和对私家医生(人数=28)、药品销售代表(人数=12)以及省级和国家级政策参与者(人数=28)的 68 次半结构式访谈的结果。在调查中,我们建立了巴基斯坦人口最多的城市卡拉奇所有注册私立医生的核实数据库,当面发放电子问卷,并对数据进行描述性分析。半结构式访谈采用了基于小故事的练习,并使用解释性方法对数据进行了分析:我们的调查显示,90% 的私人医生每周都会与医药销售代表见面。我们发现了导致与激励挂钩的处方长期存在的三个相互关联的因素:医生对利益冲突和价值观缺失的认识不足;在一个(主要)由私人资助的医疗系统中工作的医生所面临的经济压力,与不合格的医疗服务提供者之间的竞争加剧了这种压力;以及制药公司的积极激励,这与监管的政治意愿不强和过度饱和的医药市场有关:结论:在我们的研究环境中,制药公司与私人医生之间的定期互动已成为常态,而与激励挂钩的处方对医生和制药业员工的经济成功所起的重要作用阻碍了监管工作的进展。解决与激励挂钩处方根深蒂固问题的第一步,可能是减少制药业利益相关者、医生本身以及担心抑制制药业增长的政策制定者对限制医生激励的反对意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Caught in Each Other's Traps": Factors Perpetuating Incentive-Linked Prescribing Deals Between Physicians and the Pharmaceutical Industry.

Background: Despite known adverse impacts on patients and health systems, "incentive-linked prescribing," which describes the prescribing of medicines that result in personal benefits for the prescriber, remains a widespread and hidden impediment to quality of healthcare. We investigated factors perpetuating incentive-linked prescribing among primary care physicians in for-profit practices (referred to as private doctors - PDs), using Pakistan as a case study.

Methods: Our mixed-methods study synthesised insights from a survey of 419 systematically sampled PDs and 68 semi-structured interviews with PDs (n=28), pharmaceutical sales representatives (SRs) (n=12), and provincial and national policy actors (n=28). For the survey, we built a verified database of all registered PDs within Karachi, Pakistan's most populous city, administered an electronic questionnaire in-person and descriptively analysed the data. Semi-structured interviews incorporated a vignette-based exercise and data was analysed using an interpretive approach.

Results: Our survey showed that 90% of PDs met pharmaceutical SRs weekly. Three interlinked factors perpetuating incentive-linked prescribing we identified were: gaps in understanding of conflicts of interest and loss of values among doctors; financial pressures on doctors operating in a (largely) privately financed health-system, exacerbated by competition with unqualified healthcare providers; and aggressive incentivisation by pharmaceutical companies, linked to low political will to regulate an over-saturated pharmaceutical market.

Conclusion: Regular interactions between pharmaceutical companies and PDs are normalised in our study setting. Progress on regulating these is hindered by the substantial role of incentive-linked prescribing in the financial success of physicians and pharmaceutical industry employees. A first step towards addressing the entrenchment of incentive-linked prescribing may be to reduce opposition to restrictions on incentivisation of physicians from stakeholders within the pharmaceutical industry, physicians themselves, and policy-makers concerned about curtailing growth of the pharmaceutical industry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
International Journal of Health Policy and Management Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
142
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Policy and Management (IJHPM) is a monthly open access, peer-reviewed journal which serves as an international and interdisciplinary setting for the dissemination of health policy and management research. It brings together individual specialties from different fields, notably health management/policy/economics, epidemiology, social/public policy, and philosophy into a dynamic academic mix.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信