基于 Venetoclax 的联合疗法对既往未治疗过的急性髓性白血病的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Hematology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-04 DOI:10.1080/16078454.2024.2343604
Hongbo He, Xiaojia Wen, Huyong Zheng
{"title":"基于 Venetoclax 的联合疗法对既往未治疗过的急性髓性白血病的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Hongbo He, Xiaojia Wen, Huyong Zheng","doi":"10.1080/16078454.2024.2343604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the efficacy and safety of venetoclax-based combination therapy for older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) with mono-HMAs or LDAC. The random or fixed effects model was applied to the studies based on heterogeneity. Dichotomous data were summarized using the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous variable data were reported as weighted mean differences (WMDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies, including a total of 1232 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. Thec complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi) rate of the venetoclax (Ven) + azacytidine (Aza) group was significantly greater than that of the Aza monotherapy group (RR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.85-3.15; <i>P </i>< 0.001). Similarly, the CR/CRi rate of the Ven + LDAC group was also significantly greater than that of the LDAC monotherapy group (RR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.58-4.17; <i>P </i>= 0.00). The same results were observed for OS among these groups. However, the incidence of febrile neutropenia was greater in the Ven + Aza group than in the Ven + Decitabine (Dec) or monotherapy Aza group (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.90; <i>P </i>= 0.006 and RR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.58-3.03; <i>P </i>< 0.001, respectively). In addition, the Ven + LDAC group had significantly greater rates of constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting than the LDAC monotherapy group, with RRs and CIs of 0.61 (95% CI 0.44-0.83, <i>P </i>= 0.002), 1.81 (95% CI 1.22-2.67, <i>P </i>= 0.003), 1.39 (95% CI 1.06-1.82, <i>P</i> = 0.016), and 1.80 (95% CI 1.19-2.72, <i>P </i>= 0.005), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Venetoclax combined with azacitidine, decitabine, or LDAC significantly improved the CR/CRi and OS of patients with previously untreated AML. However, venetoclax plus azacitidine or LDAC was more likely to lead to increased febrile neutropenia and gastrointestinal toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13161,"journal":{"name":"Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of venetoclax-based combination therapy for previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hongbo He, Xiaojia Wen, Huyong Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16078454.2024.2343604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the efficacy and safety of venetoclax-based combination therapy for older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) with mono-HMAs or LDAC. The random or fixed effects model was applied to the studies based on heterogeneity. Dichotomous data were summarized using the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous variable data were reported as weighted mean differences (WMDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies, including a total of 1232 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. Thec complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi) rate of the venetoclax (Ven) + azacytidine (Aza) group was significantly greater than that of the Aza monotherapy group (RR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.85-3.15; <i>P </i>< 0.001). Similarly, the CR/CRi rate of the Ven + LDAC group was also significantly greater than that of the LDAC monotherapy group (RR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.58-4.17; <i>P </i>= 0.00). The same results were observed for OS among these groups. However, the incidence of febrile neutropenia was greater in the Ven + Aza group than in the Ven + Decitabine (Dec) or monotherapy Aza group (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.90; <i>P </i>= 0.006 and RR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.58-3.03; <i>P </i>< 0.001, respectively). In addition, the Ven + LDAC group had significantly greater rates of constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting than the LDAC monotherapy group, with RRs and CIs of 0.61 (95% CI 0.44-0.83, <i>P </i>= 0.002), 1.81 (95% CI 1.22-2.67, <i>P </i>= 0.003), 1.39 (95% CI 1.06-1.82, <i>P</i> = 0.016), and 1.80 (95% CI 1.19-2.72, <i>P </i>= 0.005), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Venetoclax combined with azacitidine, decitabine, or LDAC significantly improved the CR/CRi and OS of patients with previously untreated AML. However, venetoclax plus azacitidine or LDAC was more likely to lead to increased febrile neutropenia and gastrointestinal toxicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2024.2343604\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16078454.2024.2343604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨以venetoclax为基础的联合疗法对新诊断急性髓性白血病(AML)老年患者的疗效和安全性:我们对比较 Venetoclax 加甲基化抑制剂 (HMA) 或小剂量阿糖胞苷 (LDAC) 与单 HMA 或 LDAC 的临床试验进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。根据异质性对研究采用随机或固定效应模型。二分变量数据采用风险比 (RR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 进行总结。连续变量数据以加权平均差(WMDs)报告:本次荟萃分析共纳入了 9 项研究,包括 1232 名患者。venetoclax(Ven)+阿扎胞苷(Aza)组的完全缓解(CR)/完全缓解伴不完全血液学恢复(CRi)率明显高于Aza单药组(RR:2.42;95% CI:1.85-3.15;P P = 0.00)。这两组患者的 OS 结果相同。然而,Ven + Aza 组发热性中性粒细胞减少症的发生率高于 Ven + 地西他滨(Dec)或单药 Aza 组(RR:0.69;95% CI:0.53-0.90;P = 0.006 和 RR:2.19;95% CI:1.58-3.03;P P = 0.002)、1.81(95% CI 1.22-2.67,P = 0.003)、1.39(95% CI 1.06-1.82,P = 0.016)和1.80(95% CI 1.19-2.72,P = 0.005).结论:Venetoclax联合阿扎胞苷、地西他滨或LDAC可显著改善既往未经治疗的急性髓细胞白血病患者的CR/CRi和OS。然而,Venetoclax联合阿扎胞苷或LDAC更有可能导致发热性中性粒细胞减少症和胃肠道毒性增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of venetoclax-based combination therapy for previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis.

Purpose: To explore the efficacy and safety of venetoclax-based combination therapy for older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing venetoclax plus hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) with mono-HMAs or LDAC. The random or fixed effects model was applied to the studies based on heterogeneity. Dichotomous data were summarized using the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous variable data were reported as weighted mean differences (WMDs).

Results: Nine studies, including a total of 1232 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. Thec complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi) rate of the venetoclax (Ven) + azacytidine (Aza) group was significantly greater than that of the Aza monotherapy group (RR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.85-3.15; P < 0.001). Similarly, the CR/CRi rate of the Ven + LDAC group was also significantly greater than that of the LDAC monotherapy group (RR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.58-4.17; P = 0.00). The same results were observed for OS among these groups. However, the incidence of febrile neutropenia was greater in the Ven + Aza group than in the Ven + Decitabine (Dec) or monotherapy Aza group (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.90; P = 0.006 and RR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.58-3.03; P < 0.001, respectively). In addition, the Ven + LDAC group had significantly greater rates of constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting than the LDAC monotherapy group, with RRs and CIs of 0.61 (95% CI 0.44-0.83, P = 0.002), 1.81 (95% CI 1.22-2.67, P = 0.003), 1.39 (95% CI 1.06-1.82, P = 0.016), and 1.80 (95% CI 1.19-2.72, P = 0.005), respectively.

Conclusion: Venetoclax combined with azacitidine, decitabine, or LDAC significantly improved the CR/CRi and OS of patients with previously untreated AML. However, venetoclax plus azacitidine or LDAC was more likely to lead to increased febrile neutropenia and gastrointestinal toxicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hematology
Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
140
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Hematology is an international journal publishing original and review articles in the field of general hematology, including oncology, pathology, biology, clinical research and epidemiology. Of the fixed sections, annotations are accepted on any general or scientific field: technical annotations covering current laboratory practice in general hematology, blood transfusion and clinical trials, and current clinical practice reviews the consensus driven areas of care and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信