儿科重症监护病房采用和维持 CLABSI 干预措施的形成性评估。

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2024-04-03 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000719
Lindsey J Patton, Angelica Morris, Amanda Nash, Kendel Richards, Leslie Huntington, Lori Batchelor, Jenna Harris, Virginia Young, Carol J Howe
{"title":"儿科重症监护病房采用和维持 CLABSI 干预措施的形成性评估。","authors":"Lindsey J Patton, Angelica Morris, Amanda Nash, Kendel Richards, Leslie Huntington, Lori Batchelor, Jenna Harris, Virginia Young, Carol J Howe","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric patients require central venous catheters to maintain adequate hydration, nutritional status, and delivery of life-saving medications in the pediatric intensive care unit. Although central venous catheters provide critical medical therapies, their use increases the risk of severe infection, morbidity, and mortality. Adopting an evidence-based central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) bundle to guide nursing practice can decrease and sustain low CLABSI rates, but reliable and consistent implementation is challenging. This study aimed to conduct a mixed-methods formative evaluation to explore CLABSI bundle implementation strategies in a PICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The team used The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to develop the interview guide and data analysis plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Facilitators and barriers for the CLABSI bundle occurred in four domains: inner setting, process, characteristics of individuals, and innovation characteristics in each cycle that led to recommended implementation strategy opportunities. The <i>champion</i> role was a major implementation strategy that facilitated the adoption and sustainment of the CLABSI bundle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation Science Frameworks, such as Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), can be a beneficial framework to guide quality improvement efforts for evidence-based practices such as the CLABSI bundle. Using a champion role in the critical care setting may be an important implementation strategy for CLABSI bundle adoption and sustainment efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":"9 2","pages":"e719"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formative Evaluation of CLABSI Adoption and Sustainment Interventions in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey J Patton, Angelica Morris, Amanda Nash, Kendel Richards, Leslie Huntington, Lori Batchelor, Jenna Harris, Virginia Young, Carol J Howe\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric patients require central venous catheters to maintain adequate hydration, nutritional status, and delivery of life-saving medications in the pediatric intensive care unit. Although central venous catheters provide critical medical therapies, their use increases the risk of severe infection, morbidity, and mortality. Adopting an evidence-based central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) bundle to guide nursing practice can decrease and sustain low CLABSI rates, but reliable and consistent implementation is challenging. This study aimed to conduct a mixed-methods formative evaluation to explore CLABSI bundle implementation strategies in a PICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The team used The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to develop the interview guide and data analysis plan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Facilitators and barriers for the CLABSI bundle occurred in four domains: inner setting, process, characteristics of individuals, and innovation characteristics in each cycle that led to recommended implementation strategy opportunities. The <i>champion</i> role was a major implementation strategy that facilitated the adoption and sustainment of the CLABSI bundle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation Science Frameworks, such as Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), can be a beneficial framework to guide quality improvement efforts for evidence-based practices such as the CLABSI bundle. Using a champion role in the critical care setting may be an important implementation strategy for CLABSI bundle adoption and sustainment efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric quality & safety\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"e719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10990306/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric quality & safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在儿科重症监护病房,儿科患者需要使用中心静脉导管来维持充足的水分、营养状况和救命药物的输送。虽然中心静脉导管可提供关键的医疗疗法,但其使用会增加严重感染、发病率和死亡率的风险。采用循证中心静脉相关性血流感染(CLABSI)捆绑包指导护理实践可以降低并维持较低的 CLABSI 感染率,但可靠、一致的实施却具有挑战性。本研究旨在采用混合方法进行形成性评估,以探讨在 PICU 中实施 CLABSI 套件的策略:研究小组使用实施研究综合框架制定了访谈指南和数据分析计划:结果:CLABSI感染捆绑治疗的促进因素和障碍出现在四个领域:内部环境、流程、个人特征和创新特征,在每个循环中都有建议实施策略的机会。倡导者的角色是一项主要的实施策略,它促进了 CLABSI 套件的采用和维持:结论:实施科学框架,如实施研究综合框架(CFIR),可以成为指导循证实践(如 CLABSI 套件)质量改进工作的有益框架。在重症监护环境中使用支持者角色可能是采用和维持 CLABSI 套件的重要实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formative Evaluation of CLABSI Adoption and Sustainment Interventions in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Background: Pediatric patients require central venous catheters to maintain adequate hydration, nutritional status, and delivery of life-saving medications in the pediatric intensive care unit. Although central venous catheters provide critical medical therapies, their use increases the risk of severe infection, morbidity, and mortality. Adopting an evidence-based central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) bundle to guide nursing practice can decrease and sustain low CLABSI rates, but reliable and consistent implementation is challenging. This study aimed to conduct a mixed-methods formative evaluation to explore CLABSI bundle implementation strategies in a PICU.

Methods: The team used The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to develop the interview guide and data analysis plan.

Results: Facilitators and barriers for the CLABSI bundle occurred in four domains: inner setting, process, characteristics of individuals, and innovation characteristics in each cycle that led to recommended implementation strategy opportunities. The champion role was a major implementation strategy that facilitated the adoption and sustainment of the CLABSI bundle.

Conclusions: Implementation Science Frameworks, such as Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), can be a beneficial framework to guide quality improvement efforts for evidence-based practices such as the CLABSI bundle. Using a champion role in the critical care setting may be an important implementation strategy for CLABSI bundle adoption and sustainment efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信