机器学习算法提高了心脏移植心内膜活检中抗体介导排斥反应组织学成分 (AMR-H) 的诊断准确性。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Matthew Glass , Zhicheng Ji , Richard Davis , Elizabeth N. Pavlisko , Louis DiBernardo , John Carney , Gregory Fishbein , Daniel Luthringer , Dylan Miller , Richard Mitchell , Brandon Larsen , Yasmeen Butt , Melanie Bois , Joseph Maleszewski , Marc Halushka , Michael Seidman , Chieh-Yu Lin , Maximilian Buja , James Stone , David Dov , Carolyn Glass
{"title":"机器学习算法提高了心脏移植心内膜活检中抗体介导排斥反应组织学成分 (AMR-H) 的诊断准确性。","authors":"Matthew Glass ,&nbsp;Zhicheng Ji ,&nbsp;Richard Davis ,&nbsp;Elizabeth N. Pavlisko ,&nbsp;Louis DiBernardo ,&nbsp;John Carney ,&nbsp;Gregory Fishbein ,&nbsp;Daniel Luthringer ,&nbsp;Dylan Miller ,&nbsp;Richard Mitchell ,&nbsp;Brandon Larsen ,&nbsp;Yasmeen Butt ,&nbsp;Melanie Bois ,&nbsp;Joseph Maleszewski ,&nbsp;Marc Halushka ,&nbsp;Michael Seidman ,&nbsp;Chieh-Yu Lin ,&nbsp;Maximilian Buja ,&nbsp;James Stone ,&nbsp;David Dov ,&nbsp;Carolyn Glass","doi":"10.1016/j.carpath.2024.107646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pathologic antibody mediated rejection (pAMR) remains a major driver of graft failure in cardiac transplant patients. The endomyocardial biopsy remains the primary diagnostic tool but presents with challenges, particularly in distinguishing the histologic component (pAMR-H) defined by 1) intravascular macrophage accumulation in capillaries and 2) activated endothelial cells that expand the cytoplasm to narrow or occlude the vascular lumen. Frequently, pAMR-H is difficult to distinguish from acute cellular rejection (ACR) and healing injury. With the advent of digital slide scanning and advances in machine deep learning, artificial intelligence technology is widely under investigation in the areas of oncologic pathology, but in its infancy in transplant pathology. For the first time, we determined if a machine learning algorithm could distinguish pAMR-H from normal myocardium, healing injury and ACR.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A total of 4,212 annotations (1,053 regions of normal, 1,053 pAMR-H, 1,053 healing injury and 1,053 ACR) were completed from 300 hematoxylin and eosin slides scanned using a Leica Aperio GT450 digital whole slide scanner at 40X magnification. All regions of pAMR-H were annotated from patients confirmed with a previous diagnosis of pAMR2 (&gt;50% positive C4d immunofluorescence and/or &gt;10% CD68 positive intravascular macrophages). Annotations were imported into a Python 3.7 development environment using the OpenSlide™ package and a convolutional neural network approach utilizing transfer learning was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The machine learning algorithm showed 98% overall validation accuracy and pAMR-H was correctly distinguished from specific categories with the following accuracies: normal myocardium (99.2%), healing injury (99.5%) and ACR (99.5%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our novel deep learning algorithm can reach acceptable, and possibly surpass, performance of current diagnostic standards of identifying pAMR-H. Such a tool may serve as an adjunct diagnostic aid for improving the pathologist's accuracy and reproducibility, especially in difficult cases with high inter-observer variability. This is one of the first studies that provides evidence that an artificial intelligence machine learning algorithm can be trained and validated to diagnose pAMR-H in cardiac transplant patients. Ongoing studies include multi-institutional verification testing to ensure generalizability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9451,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A machine learning algorithm improves the diagnostic accuracy of the histologic component of antibody mediated rejection (AMR-H) in cardiac transplant endomyocardial biopsies\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Glass ,&nbsp;Zhicheng Ji ,&nbsp;Richard Davis ,&nbsp;Elizabeth N. Pavlisko ,&nbsp;Louis DiBernardo ,&nbsp;John Carney ,&nbsp;Gregory Fishbein ,&nbsp;Daniel Luthringer ,&nbsp;Dylan Miller ,&nbsp;Richard Mitchell ,&nbsp;Brandon Larsen ,&nbsp;Yasmeen Butt ,&nbsp;Melanie Bois ,&nbsp;Joseph Maleszewski ,&nbsp;Marc Halushka ,&nbsp;Michael Seidman ,&nbsp;Chieh-Yu Lin ,&nbsp;Maximilian Buja ,&nbsp;James Stone ,&nbsp;David Dov ,&nbsp;Carolyn Glass\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.carpath.2024.107646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pathologic antibody mediated rejection (pAMR) remains a major driver of graft failure in cardiac transplant patients. The endomyocardial biopsy remains the primary diagnostic tool but presents with challenges, particularly in distinguishing the histologic component (pAMR-H) defined by 1) intravascular macrophage accumulation in capillaries and 2) activated endothelial cells that expand the cytoplasm to narrow or occlude the vascular lumen. Frequently, pAMR-H is difficult to distinguish from acute cellular rejection (ACR) and healing injury. With the advent of digital slide scanning and advances in machine deep learning, artificial intelligence technology is widely under investigation in the areas of oncologic pathology, but in its infancy in transplant pathology. For the first time, we determined if a machine learning algorithm could distinguish pAMR-H from normal myocardium, healing injury and ACR.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A total of 4,212 annotations (1,053 regions of normal, 1,053 pAMR-H, 1,053 healing injury and 1,053 ACR) were completed from 300 hematoxylin and eosin slides scanned using a Leica Aperio GT450 digital whole slide scanner at 40X magnification. All regions of pAMR-H were annotated from patients confirmed with a previous diagnosis of pAMR2 (&gt;50% positive C4d immunofluorescence and/or &gt;10% CD68 positive intravascular macrophages). Annotations were imported into a Python 3.7 development environment using the OpenSlide™ package and a convolutional neural network approach utilizing transfer learning was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The machine learning algorithm showed 98% overall validation accuracy and pAMR-H was correctly distinguished from specific categories with the following accuracies: normal myocardium (99.2%), healing injury (99.5%) and ACR (99.5%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our novel deep learning algorithm can reach acceptable, and possibly surpass, performance of current diagnostic standards of identifying pAMR-H. Such a tool may serve as an adjunct diagnostic aid for improving the pathologist's accuracy and reproducibility, especially in difficult cases with high inter-observer variability. This is one of the first studies that provides evidence that an artificial intelligence machine learning algorithm can be trained and validated to diagnose pAMR-H in cardiac transplant patients. Ongoing studies include multi-institutional verification testing to ensure generalizability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054880724000425\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054880724000425","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:病理性抗体介导的排斥反应(pAMR)仍然是心脏移植患者移植物失败的主要原因。心内膜活检仍是主要的诊断工具,但也存在挑战,尤其是在区分组织学成分(pAMR-H)方面,其定义为:1)毛细血管内巨噬细胞聚集;2)活化的内皮细胞扩大细胞质,使血管腔狭窄或闭塞。pAMR-H 通常很难与急性细胞排斥反应(ACR)和愈合损伤区分开来。随着数字幻灯片扫描技术的出现和机器深度学习技术的进步,人工智能技术在肿瘤病理学领域得到了广泛应用,但在移植病理学领域还处于起步阶段。我们首次确定了机器学习算法能否区分pAMR-H与正常心肌、愈合损伤和ACR:使用徕卡 Aperio GT450 数字全玻片扫描仪以 40 倍放大率扫描 300 张苏木精和伊红玻片,共完成 4,212 项注释(1,053 个正常区域、1,053 个 pAMR-H、1,053 个愈合损伤和 1,053 个 ACR)。所有 pAMR-H 区域的注释均来自先前确诊为 pAMR2 的患者(C4d 免疫荧光 >50% 阳性和/或 CD68 血管内巨噬细胞 >10% 阳性)。使用 OpenSlide™ 软件包将注释导入 Python 3.7 开发环境,并利用迁移学习的卷积神经网络方法进行处理:机器学习算法的总体验证准确率为 98%,pAMR-H 与特定类别的正确区分准确率如下:正常心肌(99.2%)、愈合损伤(99.5%)和 ACR(99.5%):结论:我们的新型深度学习算法在识别 pAMR-H 方面可以达到可接受的水平,甚至可能超过目前的诊断标准。这种工具可作为辅助诊断工具,提高病理学家的准确性和可重复性,尤其是在观察者之间变异性较高的疑难病例中。这是首批研究之一,证明了人工智能机器学习算法可以通过训练和验证来诊断心脏移植患者的 pAMR-H。正在进行的研究包括多机构验证测试,以确保普适性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A machine learning algorithm improves the diagnostic accuracy of the histologic component of antibody mediated rejection (AMR-H) in cardiac transplant endomyocardial biopsies

Background

Pathologic antibody mediated rejection (pAMR) remains a major driver of graft failure in cardiac transplant patients. The endomyocardial biopsy remains the primary diagnostic tool but presents with challenges, particularly in distinguishing the histologic component (pAMR-H) defined by 1) intravascular macrophage accumulation in capillaries and 2) activated endothelial cells that expand the cytoplasm to narrow or occlude the vascular lumen. Frequently, pAMR-H is difficult to distinguish from acute cellular rejection (ACR) and healing injury. With the advent of digital slide scanning and advances in machine deep learning, artificial intelligence technology is widely under investigation in the areas of oncologic pathology, but in its infancy in transplant pathology. For the first time, we determined if a machine learning algorithm could distinguish pAMR-H from normal myocardium, healing injury and ACR.

Materials and Methods

A total of 4,212 annotations (1,053 regions of normal, 1,053 pAMR-H, 1,053 healing injury and 1,053 ACR) were completed from 300 hematoxylin and eosin slides scanned using a Leica Aperio GT450 digital whole slide scanner at 40X magnification. All regions of pAMR-H were annotated from patients confirmed with a previous diagnosis of pAMR2 (>50% positive C4d immunofluorescence and/or >10% CD68 positive intravascular macrophages). Annotations were imported into a Python 3.7 development environment using the OpenSlide™ package and a convolutional neural network approach utilizing transfer learning was performed.

Results

The machine learning algorithm showed 98% overall validation accuracy and pAMR-H was correctly distinguished from specific categories with the following accuracies: normal myocardium (99.2%), healing injury (99.5%) and ACR (99.5%).

Conclusion

Our novel deep learning algorithm can reach acceptable, and possibly surpass, performance of current diagnostic standards of identifying pAMR-H. Such a tool may serve as an adjunct diagnostic aid for improving the pathologist's accuracy and reproducibility, especially in difficult cases with high inter-observer variability. This is one of the first studies that provides evidence that an artificial intelligence machine learning algorithm can be trained and validated to diagnose pAMR-H in cardiac transplant patients. Ongoing studies include multi-institutional verification testing to ensure generalizability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Pathology
Cardiovascular Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Pathology is a bimonthly journal that presents articles on topics covering the entire spectrum of cardiovascular disease. The Journal''s primary objective is to publish papers on disease-oriented morphology and pathogenesis from clinicians and scientists in the cardiovascular field. Subjects covered include cardiovascular biology, prosthetic devices, molecular biology and experimental models of cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信