开发和验证机器学习模型,提高骨科围手术期患者不合理处方的精准预测。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2348569
Weipeng Li, Nan Shang, Zhiqi Zhang, Yun Li, Xianlin Li, Xiaojun Zheng
{"title":"开发和验证机器学习模型,提高骨科围手术期患者不合理处方的精准预测。","authors":"Weipeng Li, Nan Shang, Zhiqi Zhang, Yun Li, Xianlin Li, Xiaojun Zheng","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2348569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to develop a machine learning model capable of predicting irrational medical prescriptions precisely within orthopedic perioperative patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset comprising 3047 instances of suspected irrational medication prescriptions was collected from a sample of 1318 orthopedic perioperative patients from April 2019 to March 2022. Four machine learning models were employed to forecast irrational prescriptions, following which, the performance of each model was meticulously assessed. Subsequently, a thorough variable importance analysis was conducted on the model that performed the best predictive capabilities. Thereafter, the efficacy of integrating this optimal model into the existing audit prescription process was rigorously evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the models utilized in this study, the RF model yielded the highest AUC of 92%, whereas the NB model presented the lowest AUC of 68%. Also, the RF model boasted the most robust performance in terms of PPV, reaching 82.4%, and NPV, reaching 86.6%. The ANN and the XGBoost model were neck and neck, with the ANN slightly edging out with a higher PPV of 95.9%, while the XGBoost model boasted an impressive NPV of 98.2%. The RF model singled out the following five factors as the most influential in predicting irrational prescriptions: the type of drug, the type of surgery, the number of comorbidities, the date of surgery after hospitalization, as well as the associated hospital and drug costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RF model showcased significantly high level of proficiency in predicting irrational prescriptions among orthopedic perioperative patients, outperforming other models by a considerable margin. It effectively enhanced the efficiency of pharmacist interventions, displaying outstanding performance in assisting pharmacists to intervene with irrational prescriptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"99-109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a machine learning model to improve precision prediction for irrational prescriptions in orthopedic perioperative patients.\",\"authors\":\"Weipeng Li, Nan Shang, Zhiqi Zhang, Yun Li, Xianlin Li, Xiaojun Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2348569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to develop a machine learning model capable of predicting irrational medical prescriptions precisely within orthopedic perioperative patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset comprising 3047 instances of suspected irrational medication prescriptions was collected from a sample of 1318 orthopedic perioperative patients from April 2019 to March 2022. Four machine learning models were employed to forecast irrational prescriptions, following which, the performance of each model was meticulously assessed. Subsequently, a thorough variable importance analysis was conducted on the model that performed the best predictive capabilities. Thereafter, the efficacy of integrating this optimal model into the existing audit prescription process was rigorously evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the models utilized in this study, the RF model yielded the highest AUC of 92%, whereas the NB model presented the lowest AUC of 68%. Also, the RF model boasted the most robust performance in terms of PPV, reaching 82.4%, and NPV, reaching 86.6%. The ANN and the XGBoost model were neck and neck, with the ANN slightly edging out with a higher PPV of 95.9%, while the XGBoost model boasted an impressive NPV of 98.2%. The RF model singled out the following five factors as the most influential in predicting irrational prescriptions: the type of drug, the type of surgery, the number of comorbidities, the date of surgery after hospitalization, as well as the associated hospital and drug costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RF model showcased significantly high level of proficiency in predicting irrational prescriptions among orthopedic perioperative patients, outperforming other models by a considerable margin. It effectively enhanced the efficiency of pharmacist interventions, displaying outstanding performance in assisting pharmacists to intervene with irrational prescriptions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"99-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2348569\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2348569","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们的目标是开发一种能够准确预测骨科围手术期患者不合理用药处方的机器学习模型:从2019年4月到2022年3月,我们从1318名骨科围手术期患者样本中收集了3047个疑似不合理用药处方实例的数据集。采用了四种机器学习模型来预测不合理处方,并对每个模型的性能进行了细致评估。随后,对预测能力最强的模型进行了全面的变量重要性分析。之后,对将这一最佳模型纳入现有审计处方流程的效果进行了严格评估:结果:在本研究使用的模型中,RF 模型的 AUC 最高,为 92%,而 NB 模型的 AUC 最低,为 68%。此外,RF 模型在 PPV(82.4%)和 NPV(86.6%)方面的表现最为稳健。ANN 和 XGBoost 模型并驾齐驱,其中 ANN 以 95.9% 的较高 PPV 略胜一筹,而 XGBoost 模型则以 98.2% 的惊人 NPV 傲视群雄。RF 模型认为以下五个因素对预测不合理处方的影响最大:药物类型、手术类型、合并症数量、住院后的手术日期以及相关的住院和药物费用:射频模型在预测骨科围手术期患者的不合理处方方面表现出极高的准确性,远远优于其他模型。它有效提高了药剂师干预的效率,在协助药剂师干预不合理处方方面表现突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a machine learning model to improve precision prediction for irrational prescriptions in orthopedic perioperative patients.

Objective: Our objective was to develop a machine learning model capable of predicting irrational medical prescriptions precisely within orthopedic perioperative patients.

Methods: A dataset comprising 3047 instances of suspected irrational medication prescriptions was collected from a sample of 1318 orthopedic perioperative patients from April 2019 to March 2022. Four machine learning models were employed to forecast irrational prescriptions, following which, the performance of each model was meticulously assessed. Subsequently, a thorough variable importance analysis was conducted on the model that performed the best predictive capabilities. Thereafter, the efficacy of integrating this optimal model into the existing audit prescription process was rigorously evaluated.

Results: Of the models utilized in this study, the RF model yielded the highest AUC of 92%, whereas the NB model presented the lowest AUC of 68%. Also, the RF model boasted the most robust performance in terms of PPV, reaching 82.4%, and NPV, reaching 86.6%. The ANN and the XGBoost model were neck and neck, with the ANN slightly edging out with a higher PPV of 95.9%, while the XGBoost model boasted an impressive NPV of 98.2%. The RF model singled out the following five factors as the most influential in predicting irrational prescriptions: the type of drug, the type of surgery, the number of comorbidities, the date of surgery after hospitalization, as well as the associated hospital and drug costs.

Conclusion: The RF model showcased significantly high level of proficiency in predicting irrational prescriptions among orthopedic perioperative patients, outperforming other models by a considerable margin. It effectively enhanced the efficiency of pharmacist interventions, displaying outstanding performance in assisting pharmacists to intervene with irrational prescriptions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信