树脂复合材料在不同修饰和抛光体系下的唾液降解、酸性降解和酶降解。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2024-04-01
Lais M Berri, Evelin V M Keese, Fabiana M G França, Roberta T Basting, Waldemir F Vieira Junior, Cecilia P Turssi
{"title":"树脂复合材料在不同修饰和抛光体系下的唾液降解、酸性降解和酶降解。","authors":"Lais M Berri, Evelin V M Keese, Fabiana M G França, Roberta T Basting, Waldemir F Vieira Junior, Cecilia P Turssi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of a resin composite subjected to simulated saliva-, acid-, and enzyme-induced degradation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>160 specimens (n= 40) were fabricated with Filtek Z350 XT nanofilled composite and analyzed for average surface roughness (Ra). The specimens were finished and polished using: AD - Al₂O₃-impreginated rubberized discs (medium, fine, and superfine grit, Sof-Lex); SD - silicon carbide and Al₂O₃-impregnated rubberized discs (coarse, medium and fine grit, Jiffy,); MB - 12- and 30-multiblade burs. The control group (CT) (n= 40) comprised specimens with a Mylar-strip-created surface. Specimens from each group were immersed in 1 mL of one of the degradation methods (n= 10): artificial saliva (ArS: pH 6.75), cariogenic challenge (CaC: pH 4.3), erosive challenge (ErC: 0.05M citric acid, pH 2.3) or enzymatic challenge (EzC: artificial saliva with 700 µg/mL of albumin, pH 6.75). The immersion period simulated a time frame of 180 days. Ra measurements were also performed at the post-polishing and post-degradation time points. The data were evaluated by three-way ANOVA for repeated measures and the Tukey tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significant interaction between the finishing/polishing system and the degradation method (P= 0.001). AD presented the greatest smoothness, followed by SD. After degradation, CT, AD and SD groups became significantly rougher, but not the MB group, which presented no difference in roughness before or after degradation. CT and AD groups showed greater roughness in CaC, ErC and EzC than in ArS. The SD group showed no difference in roughness when the specimens were polished with CaC, EzC or ArS, but those treated with ErC had greater roughness. In the MB group, the lower roughness values were found after using CaC and EzC, while the higher values were found using ErC or ArS.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>As far as degradation resistance of nanofilled composite to hydrolysis, bacterial and dietary acids and enzymatic reactions is concerned, restorations that had been finished and polished with Al₂O₃-impregnated discs had the smoothest surfaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"37 2","pages":"66-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Salivary, acidic and enzymatic degradation of resin composite subjected to different finishing and polishing systems.\",\"authors\":\"Lais M Berri, Evelin V M Keese, Fabiana M G França, Roberta T Basting, Waldemir F Vieira Junior, Cecilia P Turssi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of a resin composite subjected to simulated saliva-, acid-, and enzyme-induced degradation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>160 specimens (n= 40) were fabricated with Filtek Z350 XT nanofilled composite and analyzed for average surface roughness (Ra). The specimens were finished and polished using: AD - Al₂O₃-impreginated rubberized discs (medium, fine, and superfine grit, Sof-Lex); SD - silicon carbide and Al₂O₃-impregnated rubberized discs (coarse, medium and fine grit, Jiffy,); MB - 12- and 30-multiblade burs. The control group (CT) (n= 40) comprised specimens with a Mylar-strip-created surface. Specimens from each group were immersed in 1 mL of one of the degradation methods (n= 10): artificial saliva (ArS: pH 6.75), cariogenic challenge (CaC: pH 4.3), erosive challenge (ErC: 0.05M citric acid, pH 2.3) or enzymatic challenge (EzC: artificial saliva with 700 µg/mL of albumin, pH 6.75). The immersion period simulated a time frame of 180 days. Ra measurements were also performed at the post-polishing and post-degradation time points. The data were evaluated by three-way ANOVA for repeated measures and the Tukey tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was significant interaction between the finishing/polishing system and the degradation method (P= 0.001). AD presented the greatest smoothness, followed by SD. After degradation, CT, AD and SD groups became significantly rougher, but not the MB group, which presented no difference in roughness before or after degradation. CT and AD groups showed greater roughness in CaC, ErC and EzC than in ArS. The SD group showed no difference in roughness when the specimens were polished with CaC, EzC or ArS, but those treated with ErC had greater roughness. In the MB group, the lower roughness values were found after using CaC and EzC, while the higher values were found using ErC or ArS.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>As far as degradation resistance of nanofilled composite to hydrolysis, bacterial and dietary acids and enzymatic reactions is concerned, restorations that had been finished and polished with Al₂O₃-impregnated discs had the smoothest surfaces.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"66-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估不同的表面处理和抛光系统对模拟唾液、酸和酶诱导降解的树脂复合材料表面粗糙度的影响。方法:用 Filtek Z350 XT 纳米填充复合材料制作 160 个试样(n= 40),分析其平均表面粗糙度(Ra)。试样用以下材料加工和抛光:AD--Al₂O₃浸渍橡胶磨片(中、细和超细磨粒,Sof-Lex);SD--碳化硅和 Al₂O₃ 浸渍橡胶磨片(粗、中、细磨粒,Jiffy);MB--12 号和 30 号多刃车针。对照组(CT)(n= 40)包括表面经 Mylar 胶条处理的试样。每组的标本都浸泡在 1 mL 的降解方法中(n= 10):人工唾液(ArS:pH 6.75)、致龋挑战(CaC:pH 4.3)、侵蚀挑战(ErC:0.05M 柠檬酸,pH 2.3)或酶挑战(EzC:含 700 µg/mL 白蛋白的人工唾液,pH 6.75)。浸泡时间模拟为 180 天。在抛光后和降解后的时间点也进行了 Ra 测量。对数据进行了重复测量的三方方差分析和 Tukey 检验:结果:表面处理/抛光系统与降解方法之间存在明显的交互作用(P= 0.001)。AD 的光滑度最高,其次是 SD。降解后,CT、AD 和 SD 组的粗糙度明显增加,但 MB 组没有增加,因为其粗糙度在降解前后没有差异。CT 组和 AD 组在 CaC、ErC 和 EzC 中的粗糙度高于 ArS。用 CaC、EzC 或 ArS 抛光的 SD 组试样的粗糙度没有差异,但用 ErC 抛光的试样粗糙度更高。在 MB 组中,使用 CaC 和 EzC 抛光后的粗糙度值较低,而使用 ErC 或 ArS 抛光后的粗糙度值较高:临床意义:就纳米填充复合材料对水解、细菌和食物酸以及酶反应的耐降解性而言,使用Al₂O₃浸渍盘进行加工和抛光的修复体表面最光滑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Salivary, acidic and enzymatic degradation of resin composite subjected to different finishing and polishing systems.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of a resin composite subjected to simulated saliva-, acid-, and enzyme-induced degradation.

Methods: 160 specimens (n= 40) were fabricated with Filtek Z350 XT nanofilled composite and analyzed for average surface roughness (Ra). The specimens were finished and polished using: AD - Al₂O₃-impreginated rubberized discs (medium, fine, and superfine grit, Sof-Lex); SD - silicon carbide and Al₂O₃-impregnated rubberized discs (coarse, medium and fine grit, Jiffy,); MB - 12- and 30-multiblade burs. The control group (CT) (n= 40) comprised specimens with a Mylar-strip-created surface. Specimens from each group were immersed in 1 mL of one of the degradation methods (n= 10): artificial saliva (ArS: pH 6.75), cariogenic challenge (CaC: pH 4.3), erosive challenge (ErC: 0.05M citric acid, pH 2.3) or enzymatic challenge (EzC: artificial saliva with 700 µg/mL of albumin, pH 6.75). The immersion period simulated a time frame of 180 days. Ra measurements were also performed at the post-polishing and post-degradation time points. The data were evaluated by three-way ANOVA for repeated measures and the Tukey tests.

Results: There was significant interaction between the finishing/polishing system and the degradation method (P= 0.001). AD presented the greatest smoothness, followed by SD. After degradation, CT, AD and SD groups became significantly rougher, but not the MB group, which presented no difference in roughness before or after degradation. CT and AD groups showed greater roughness in CaC, ErC and EzC than in ArS. The SD group showed no difference in roughness when the specimens were polished with CaC, EzC or ArS, but those treated with ErC had greater roughness. In the MB group, the lower roughness values were found after using CaC and EzC, while the higher values were found using ErC or ArS.

Clinical significance: As far as degradation resistance of nanofilled composite to hydrolysis, bacterial and dietary acids and enzymatic reactions is concerned, restorations that had been finished and polished with Al₂O₃-impregnated discs had the smoothest surfaces.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信