美国半干旱高原地区提高作物产量的燃煤残渣

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRONOMY
Vesh R. Thapa, Bijesh Maharjan, Humberto Blanco-Canqui, Nevin Lawrence, Saurav Das, Cody Creech, Gary W. Hergert
{"title":"美国半干旱高原地区提高作物产量的燃煤残渣","authors":"Vesh R. Thapa,&nbsp;Bijesh Maharjan,&nbsp;Humberto Blanco-Canqui,&nbsp;Nevin Lawrence,&nbsp;Saurav Das,&nbsp;Cody Creech,&nbsp;Gary W. Hergert","doi":"10.1002/agg2.20505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Carbon (C) amendments can enhance crop productivity, particularly in semiarid regions. Understanding the potential interference of C amendment with herbicide efficacies is essential to informing the practice. An experiment was conducted in western Nebraska in 2016–2018 to evaluate the effects of coal combustion residue (CCR) and herbicides on crop yields and weed density in the dry bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i> L.)–maize<sub>db</sub> (maize [<i>Zea mays</i> L.] following dry bean)–sugarbeet (<i>Beta vulgaris</i> L.)–maize<sub>sb</sub> (maize following sugarbeet) rotation. All crop phases of the rotation were present each year and received CCR at varying rates (0, 3.3, 6.6, 13.1, and 19.7 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>) in spring 2016. Overall, CCR did not have consistent beneficial effects on crop yields. There were trends for yield benefits with CCR application compared to no-CCR plots in dry bean (<i>p</i> = 0.066) and sugar beet (<i>p</i> = 0.155) in 2017 and maize<sub>db</sub> in 2018 (<i>p</i> = 0.222). In 2016, among no-herbicide treatments, the treatment with the highest CCR rate had a greater maize<sub>sb</sub> yield (16.2 ± 0.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) than the rest of the CCR treatments, including the control. The CCR application did not adversely affect herbicide efficacy in weed control. However, in 2016, among plots where herbicide (saflufenacil + dimethenamid-p) was applied, the CCR treatment (6.6 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>) had lower maize<sub>sb</sub> yield than the control. Future research should consider factors such as application rates, methods, and timing to assess the potential adverse effects of C amendments on herbicide efficacies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.20505","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coal combustion residue for crop productivity in the semiarid US High Plains\",\"authors\":\"Vesh R. Thapa,&nbsp;Bijesh Maharjan,&nbsp;Humberto Blanco-Canqui,&nbsp;Nevin Lawrence,&nbsp;Saurav Das,&nbsp;Cody Creech,&nbsp;Gary W. Hergert\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agg2.20505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Carbon (C) amendments can enhance crop productivity, particularly in semiarid regions. Understanding the potential interference of C amendment with herbicide efficacies is essential to informing the practice. An experiment was conducted in western Nebraska in 2016–2018 to evaluate the effects of coal combustion residue (CCR) and herbicides on crop yields and weed density in the dry bean (<i>Phaseolus vulgaris</i> L.)–maize<sub>db</sub> (maize [<i>Zea mays</i> L.] following dry bean)–sugarbeet (<i>Beta vulgaris</i> L.)–maize<sub>sb</sub> (maize following sugarbeet) rotation. All crop phases of the rotation were present each year and received CCR at varying rates (0, 3.3, 6.6, 13.1, and 19.7 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>) in spring 2016. Overall, CCR did not have consistent beneficial effects on crop yields. There were trends for yield benefits with CCR application compared to no-CCR plots in dry bean (<i>p</i> = 0.066) and sugar beet (<i>p</i> = 0.155) in 2017 and maize<sub>db</sub> in 2018 (<i>p</i> = 0.222). In 2016, among no-herbicide treatments, the treatment with the highest CCR rate had a greater maize<sub>sb</sub> yield (16.2 ± 0.1 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) than the rest of the CCR treatments, including the control. The CCR application did not adversely affect herbicide efficacy in weed control. However, in 2016, among plots where herbicide (saflufenacil + dimethenamid-p) was applied, the CCR treatment (6.6 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>) had lower maize<sub>sb</sub> yield than the control. Future research should consider factors such as application rates, methods, and timing to assess the potential adverse effects of C amendments on herbicide efficacies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.20505\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.20505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.20505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳(C)添加剂可以提高作物产量,尤其是在半干旱地区。了解碳添加剂对除草剂药效的潜在干扰对指导实践至关重要。2016-2018 年在内布拉斯加州西部进行了一项实验,以评估燃煤残渣(CCR)和除草剂对干豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)-maizesb(玉米 [Zea mays L.] 后干豆)-甜菜(Beta vulgaris L.)-maizesb(玉米后甜菜)轮作中作物产量和杂草密度的影响。轮作的所有作物阶段每年都有,并在 2016 年春季以不同比例(0、3.3、6.6、13.1 和 19.7 兆克 C ha-1)接受 CCR。总体而言,CCR 对作物产量的益处并不一致。与不施用 CCR 的地块相比,2017 年在干豆(p = 0.066)和甜菜(p = 0.155)以及 2018 年在玉米b(p = 0.222)中施用 CCR 有增产的趋势。2016 年,在无除草剂处理中,CCR 比率最高的处理的玉米产量(16.2 ± 0.1 兆克公顷-1)高于包括对照在内的其他 CCR 处理。施用 CCR 不会对除草剂的除草效果产生不利影响。然而,2016 年,在施用除草剂(氟虫腈 + 二甲吩草胺-p)的地块中,CCR 处理(6.6 兆克 C ha-1)的玉米产量b 低于对照。未来的研究应考虑施用量、方法和时间等因素,以评估碳添加剂对除草剂功效的潜在不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Coal combustion residue for crop productivity in the semiarid US High Plains

Coal combustion residue for crop productivity in the semiarid US High Plains

Carbon (C) amendments can enhance crop productivity, particularly in semiarid regions. Understanding the potential interference of C amendment with herbicide efficacies is essential to informing the practice. An experiment was conducted in western Nebraska in 2016–2018 to evaluate the effects of coal combustion residue (CCR) and herbicides on crop yields and weed density in the dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)–maizedb (maize [Zea mays L.] following dry bean)–sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.)–maizesb (maize following sugarbeet) rotation. All crop phases of the rotation were present each year and received CCR at varying rates (0, 3.3, 6.6, 13.1, and 19.7 Mg C ha−1) in spring 2016. Overall, CCR did not have consistent beneficial effects on crop yields. There were trends for yield benefits with CCR application compared to no-CCR plots in dry bean (p = 0.066) and sugar beet (p = 0.155) in 2017 and maizedb in 2018 (p = 0.222). In 2016, among no-herbicide treatments, the treatment with the highest CCR rate had a greater maizesb yield (16.2 ± 0.1 Mg ha−1) than the rest of the CCR treatments, including the control. The CCR application did not adversely affect herbicide efficacy in weed control. However, in 2016, among plots where herbicide (saflufenacil + dimethenamid-p) was applied, the CCR treatment (6.6 Mg C ha−1) had lower maizesb yield than the control. Future research should consider factors such as application rates, methods, and timing to assess the potential adverse effects of C amendments on herbicide efficacies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信