将流动危机处理模式与社区相匹配:安大略省西北部的一个例子

Jillian Zitars, Deborah Scharf
{"title":"将流动危机处理模式与社区相匹配:安大略省西北部的一个例子","authors":"Jillian Zitars, Deborah Scharf","doi":"10.1007/s11414-024-09882-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Police are often the first to encounter individuals when they are experiencing a mental health crisis. Other professionals with different skill sets, however, may be needed to optimize crisis response. Increasingly, police and mental health agencies are creating co-responder teams (CRTs) in which police and mental health professionals co-respond to crisis calls. While past evaluations of CRTs have shown promising results (e.g. hospital diversions; cost-effectiveness), most studies occurred in larger urban contexts. How CRTs function in smaller jurisdictions, with fewer complementary resources and other unique contextual features, is unknown. This paper describes the evaluation of a CRT operating in a geographically isolated and northern mid-sized city in Ontario, Canada. Data from program documents, interviews with frontline and leadership staff, and ride-along site visits were analyzed according to an extended Donabedian framework. Through thematic analysis, 12 themes and 11 subthemes emerged. Overall, data showed that the program was generally operating and supporting the community as intended through crisis de-escalation and improved quality of care, but it illuminated potential areas for improvement, including complementary community-based services. Data suggested specific structures and processes of the embedded CRT model for optimal function in a northern context, and it demonstrated the transferability of the CRT model beyond large urban centres. This research has implications for how communities can make informed choices about what crisis models are best for them based on their resources and context, thus potentially improving crisis response and alleviating strain on emergency departments and systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":501693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Matching Mobile Crisis Models to Communities: An Example from Northwestern Ontario\",\"authors\":\"Jillian Zitars, Deborah Scharf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11414-024-09882-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Police are often the first to encounter individuals when they are experiencing a mental health crisis. Other professionals with different skill sets, however, may be needed to optimize crisis response. Increasingly, police and mental health agencies are creating co-responder teams (CRTs) in which police and mental health professionals co-respond to crisis calls. While past evaluations of CRTs have shown promising results (e.g. hospital diversions; cost-effectiveness), most studies occurred in larger urban contexts. How CRTs function in smaller jurisdictions, with fewer complementary resources and other unique contextual features, is unknown. This paper describes the evaluation of a CRT operating in a geographically isolated and northern mid-sized city in Ontario, Canada. Data from program documents, interviews with frontline and leadership staff, and ride-along site visits were analyzed according to an extended Donabedian framework. Through thematic analysis, 12 themes and 11 subthemes emerged. Overall, data showed that the program was generally operating and supporting the community as intended through crisis de-escalation and improved quality of care, but it illuminated potential areas for improvement, including complementary community-based services. Data suggested specific structures and processes of the embedded CRT model for optimal function in a northern context, and it demonstrated the transferability of the CRT model beyond large urban centres. This research has implications for how communities can make informed choices about what crisis models are best for them based on their resources and context, thus potentially improving crisis response and alleviating strain on emergency departments and systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-024-09882-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-024-09882-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当人们遇到心理健康危机时,警察往往是最先接触到他们的人。然而,为了优化危机应对,可能还需要其他具备不同技能的专业人员。越来越多的警察和心理健康机构正在建立共同应对小组(CRTs),由警察和心理健康专业人员共同应对危机电话。虽然过去对共同应对小组的评估显示出了良好的效果(如医院分流、成本效益),但大多数研究都是在较大的城市环境中进行的。在较小的辖区内,由于补充资源较少以及其他独特的环境特征,CRT 如何发挥作用尚不得而知。本文介绍了对加拿大安大略省一个地理位置偏僻、北部中等城市的 CRT 的评估。根据扩展的多纳比德框架,对来自项目文件、一线员工和领导访谈以及实地考察的数据进行了分析。通过主题分析,得出了 12 个主题和 11 个次主题。总体而言,数据显示,该计划通过危机缓和和提高护理质量,总体上按照预期运行并为社区提供支持,但也揭示了潜在的改进领域,包括基于社区的补充服务。数据表明,嵌入式 CRT 模式的特定结构和流程能够在北方地区发挥最佳作用,同时也证明了 CRT 模式在大型城市中心以外的可移植性。这项研究对于社区如何根据其资源和环境,明智地选择最适合自己的危机模式具有重要意义,从而有可能改善危机响应,减轻急诊部门和系统的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Matching Mobile Crisis Models to Communities: An Example from Northwestern Ontario

Police are often the first to encounter individuals when they are experiencing a mental health crisis. Other professionals with different skill sets, however, may be needed to optimize crisis response. Increasingly, police and mental health agencies are creating co-responder teams (CRTs) in which police and mental health professionals co-respond to crisis calls. While past evaluations of CRTs have shown promising results (e.g. hospital diversions; cost-effectiveness), most studies occurred in larger urban contexts. How CRTs function in smaller jurisdictions, with fewer complementary resources and other unique contextual features, is unknown. This paper describes the evaluation of a CRT operating in a geographically isolated and northern mid-sized city in Ontario, Canada. Data from program documents, interviews with frontline and leadership staff, and ride-along site visits were analyzed according to an extended Donabedian framework. Through thematic analysis, 12 themes and 11 subthemes emerged. Overall, data showed that the program was generally operating and supporting the community as intended through crisis de-escalation and improved quality of care, but it illuminated potential areas for improvement, including complementary community-based services. Data suggested specific structures and processes of the embedded CRT model for optimal function in a northern context, and it demonstrated the transferability of the CRT model beyond large urban centres. This research has implications for how communities can make informed choices about what crisis models are best for them based on their resources and context, thus potentially improving crisis response and alleviating strain on emergency departments and systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信