致编辑的信,内容涉及文章 "化疗开始前,我们能预测乳腺肿瘤的反应吗?使用乳腺 MRI 肿瘤数据集的深度学习卷积神经网络方法"

IF 2.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Joren Brunekreef
{"title":"致编辑的信,内容涉及文章 \"化疗开始前,我们能预测乳腺肿瘤的反应吗?使用乳腺 MRI 肿瘤数据集的深度学习卷积神经网络方法\"","authors":"Joren Brunekreef","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01129-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The cited article reports on a convolutional neural network trained to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy from pre-treatment breast MRI scans. The proposed algorithm attains impressive performance on the test dataset with a mean Area Under the Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve of 0.98 and a mean accuracy of 88%. In this letter, I raise concerns that the reported results can be explained by inadvertent data leakage between training and test datasets. More precisely, I conjecture that the random split of the full dataset in training and test sets did not occur on a patient level, but rather on the level of 2D MRI slices. This allows the neural network to “memorize” a patient’s anatomy and their treatment outcome, as opposed to discovering useful features for treatment response prediction. To provide evidence for these claims, I present results of similar experiments I conducted on a public breast MRI dataset, where I demonstrate that the suspected data leakage mechanism closely reproduces the results reported on in the cited work.</p>","PeriodicalId":50214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Imaging","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letter to the Editor Regarding Article “Prior to Initiation of Chemotherapy, Can We Predict Breast Tumor Response? Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Networks Approach Using a Breast MRI Tumor Dataset”\",\"authors\":\"Joren Brunekreef\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10278-024-01129-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The cited article reports on a convolutional neural network trained to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy from pre-treatment breast MRI scans. The proposed algorithm attains impressive performance on the test dataset with a mean Area Under the Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve of 0.98 and a mean accuracy of 88%. In this letter, I raise concerns that the reported results can be explained by inadvertent data leakage between training and test datasets. More precisely, I conjecture that the random split of the full dataset in training and test sets did not occur on a patient level, but rather on the level of 2D MRI slices. This allows the neural network to “memorize” a patient’s anatomy and their treatment outcome, as opposed to discovering useful features for treatment response prediction. To provide evidence for these claims, I present results of similar experiments I conducted on a public breast MRI dataset, where I demonstrate that the suspected data leakage mechanism closely reproduces the results reported on in the cited work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Digital Imaging\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Digital Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01129-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01129-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引用的文章报告了一种经过训练的卷积神经网络,用于根据治疗前的乳腺核磁共振扫描结果预测新辅助化疗的反应。所提出的算法在测试数据集上取得了令人印象深刻的性能,其接收者操作特性曲线下的平均面积为 0.98,平均准确率为 88%。在这封信中,我担心所报告的结果可能是由于训练数据集和测试数据集之间的无意数据泄露造成的。更确切地说,我推测训练集和测试集中完整数据集的随机拆分不是发生在患者层面,而是发生在二维 MRI 切片层面。这使得神经网络能够 "记忆 "患者的解剖结构和治疗结果,而不是发现有用的治疗反应预测特征。为了给这些说法提供证据,我介绍了我在一个公开的乳腺 MRI 数据集上进行的类似实验的结果,我在实验中证明了疑似数据泄漏机制与所引用工作中报告的结果密切重现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Letter to the Editor Regarding Article “Prior to Initiation of Chemotherapy, Can We Predict Breast Tumor Response? Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Networks Approach Using a Breast MRI Tumor Dataset”

Letter to the Editor Regarding Article “Prior to Initiation of Chemotherapy, Can We Predict Breast Tumor Response? Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Networks Approach Using a Breast MRI Tumor Dataset”

The cited article reports on a convolutional neural network trained to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy from pre-treatment breast MRI scans. The proposed algorithm attains impressive performance on the test dataset with a mean Area Under the Receiver-Operating Characteristic curve of 0.98 and a mean accuracy of 88%. In this letter, I raise concerns that the reported results can be explained by inadvertent data leakage between training and test datasets. More precisely, I conjecture that the random split of the full dataset in training and test sets did not occur on a patient level, but rather on the level of 2D MRI slices. This allows the neural network to “memorize” a patient’s anatomy and their treatment outcome, as opposed to discovering useful features for treatment response prediction. To provide evidence for these claims, I present results of similar experiments I conducted on a public breast MRI dataset, where I demonstrate that the suspected data leakage mechanism closely reproduces the results reported on in the cited work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Digital Imaging
Journal of Digital Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Digital Imaging (JDI) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM). JDI’s goal is to enhance the exchange of knowledge encompassed by the general topic of Imaging Informatics in Medicine such as research and practice in clinical, engineering, and information technologies and techniques in all medical imaging environments. JDI topics are of interest to researchers, developers, educators, physicians, and imaging informatics professionals. Suggested Topics PACS and component systems; imaging informatics for the enterprise; image-enabled electronic medical records; RIS and HIS; digital image acquisition; image processing; image data compression; 3D, visualization, and multimedia; speech recognition; computer-aided diagnosis; facilities design; imaging vocabularies and ontologies; Transforming the Radiological Interpretation Process (TRIP™); DICOM and other standards; workflow and process modeling and simulation; quality assurance; archive integrity and security; teleradiology; digital mammography; and radiological informatics education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信