创新对不对称成本行为重要吗?专利前向引用的证据

Seul Gi Oh, Kyeongheum Ra
{"title":"创新对不对称成本行为重要吗?专利前向引用的证据","authors":"Seul Gi Oh, Kyeongheum Ra","doi":"10.1111/acfi.13267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates how innovation affects cost stickiness. Utilising data on patents of US firms between 1991 and 2022, we find that the extent of cost stickiness is greater with a greater number of forward citations for patents. We also find that the main relationship is more pronounced in high‐tech industries, high labour cost intensity, and market competition. In addition, we find that firms with a higher number of patents and forward citation experience a subsequent increase in sales. Overall, this makes a valuable addition to the extant literature, proposing that patents serve as an alternative driver of cost stickiness.","PeriodicalId":501109,"journal":{"name":"Accounting & Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does innovation matter for asymmetric cost behaviour? Evidence from forward citations to the patents\",\"authors\":\"Seul Gi Oh, Kyeongheum Ra\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acfi.13267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates how innovation affects cost stickiness. Utilising data on patents of US firms between 1991 and 2022, we find that the extent of cost stickiness is greater with a greater number of forward citations for patents. We also find that the main relationship is more pronounced in high‐tech industries, high labour cost intensity, and market competition. In addition, we find that firms with a higher number of patents and forward citation experience a subsequent increase in sales. Overall, this makes a valuable addition to the extant literature, proposing that patents serve as an alternative driver of cost stickiness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting & Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了创新如何影响成本粘性。利用 1991 年至 2022 年间美国公司的专利数据,我们发现,专利的前向引用次数越多,成本粘性程度越高。我们还发现,这种主要关系在高科技产业、劳动力成本密集度高和市场竞争激烈的行业中更为明显。此外,我们还发现,专利和前向引用数量越多的企业,其销售额也会随之增加。总之,这是对现有文献的宝贵补充,提出了专利作为成本粘性的另一种驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does innovation matter for asymmetric cost behaviour? Evidence from forward citations to the patents
This study investigates how innovation affects cost stickiness. Utilising data on patents of US firms between 1991 and 2022, we find that the extent of cost stickiness is greater with a greater number of forward citations for patents. We also find that the main relationship is more pronounced in high‐tech industries, high labour cost intensity, and market competition. In addition, we find that firms with a higher number of patents and forward citation experience a subsequent increase in sales. Overall, this makes a valuable addition to the extant literature, proposing that patents serve as an alternative driver of cost stickiness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信