有听力障碍和无听力障碍的人工耳蜗使用者的声乐情感感知、声音线索辨别力和生活质量

Eleanor E. Harding, Etienne Gaudrain, Barbara Tillmann, Bert Maat, Robert L. Harris, Rolien H. Free, Deniz Başkent
{"title":"有听力障碍和无听力障碍的人工耳蜗使用者的声乐情感感知、声音线索辨别力和生活质量","authors":"Eleanor E. Harding, Etienne Gaudrain, Barbara Tillmann, Bert Maat, Robert L. Harris, Rolien H. Free, Deniz Başkent","doi":"10.1101/2024.04.28.24305905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to provide a comprehensive picture of auditory emotion perception in cochlear implant (CI) users by (1) investigating emotion categorization in both vocal (pseudo-speech) and musical domains and (2) how individual differences in residual acoustic hearing, sensitivity to voice cues (voice pitch, vocal tract length), and quality of life (QoL) might be associated with vocal emotion perception and, going a step further, also with musical emotion perception. In 28 adult CI users, with or without self-reported acoustic hearing, we showed that sensitivity (d’) scores for emotion categorization varied largely across the participants, in line with previous research. However, within participants, the d’ scores for vocal and musical emotion categorization were significantly correlated, indicating similar processing of auditory emotional cues across the pseudo-speech and music domains and robustness of the tests. Only for musical emotion perception, emotion d’ scores were higher in implant users with residual acoustic hearing compared to no acoustic hearing. The voice pitch perception did not significantly correlate with emotion categorization in either domain, while the vocal tract length significantly correlated in both domains. For QoL, only the subdomain of Speech production ability, but not the overall QoL scores, correlated with vocal emotion categorization, partially supporting previous findings. Taken together, results indicate that auditory emotion perception is challenging for some CI users, possibly a consequence of how available the emotion-related cues are via electric hearing. Improving these cues, either via rehabilitation or training, may also help auditory emotion perception in CI users.","PeriodicalId":501185,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Otolaryngology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vocal and musical emotion perception, voice cue discrimination, and quality of life in cochlear implant users with and without acoustic hearing\",\"authors\":\"Eleanor E. Harding, Etienne Gaudrain, Barbara Tillmann, Bert Maat, Robert L. Harris, Rolien H. Free, Deniz Başkent\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.04.28.24305905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to provide a comprehensive picture of auditory emotion perception in cochlear implant (CI) users by (1) investigating emotion categorization in both vocal (pseudo-speech) and musical domains and (2) how individual differences in residual acoustic hearing, sensitivity to voice cues (voice pitch, vocal tract length), and quality of life (QoL) might be associated with vocal emotion perception and, going a step further, also with musical emotion perception. In 28 adult CI users, with or without self-reported acoustic hearing, we showed that sensitivity (d’) scores for emotion categorization varied largely across the participants, in line with previous research. However, within participants, the d’ scores for vocal and musical emotion categorization were significantly correlated, indicating similar processing of auditory emotional cues across the pseudo-speech and music domains and robustness of the tests. Only for musical emotion perception, emotion d’ scores were higher in implant users with residual acoustic hearing compared to no acoustic hearing. The voice pitch perception did not significantly correlate with emotion categorization in either domain, while the vocal tract length significantly correlated in both domains. For QoL, only the subdomain of Speech production ability, but not the overall QoL scores, correlated with vocal emotion categorization, partially supporting previous findings. Taken together, results indicate that auditory emotion perception is challenging for some CI users, possibly a consequence of how available the emotion-related cues are via electric hearing. Improving these cues, either via rehabilitation or training, may also help auditory emotion perception in CI users.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Otolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Otolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.28.24305905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.28.24305905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过以下方法全面了解人工耳蜗(CI)用户的听觉情感感知:(1)调查声乐(伪语音)和音乐领域的情感分类;(2)研究个体在残余听力、对声音线索(声调、声道长度)的敏感度以及生活质量(QoL)方面的差异如何与声乐情感感知以及音乐情感感知相关联。我们对 28 名成年 CI 使用者进行了研究,无论他们是否自称有听力障碍,研究结果表明,情感分类的敏感度(d')得分在很大程度上因人而异,这与之前的研究结果一致。然而,在同一参与者中,声乐和音乐情绪分类的 d' 分数具有显著的相关性,这表明在伪语音和音乐领域中,听觉情绪线索的处理过程相似,而且测试具有稳健性。只有在音乐情感感知方面,有残余听力的植入者的情感 d'得分高于无残余听力的植入者。声调感知与情感分类在两个领域都没有明显的相关性,而声道长度在两个领域都有明显的相关性。在 QoL 方面,只有 "语音生成能力 "子域与发声情绪分类相关,而 QoL 总分与发声情绪分类无关,这在一定程度上支持了之前的研究结果。综上所述,研究结果表明,听觉情绪感知对一些人工耳蜗使用者来说具有挑战性,这可能是电听情绪相关线索可用性的结果。通过康复或训练来改善这些线索,也可能有助于 CI 用户的听觉情绪感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vocal and musical emotion perception, voice cue discrimination, and quality of life in cochlear implant users with and without acoustic hearing
This study aims to provide a comprehensive picture of auditory emotion perception in cochlear implant (CI) users by (1) investigating emotion categorization in both vocal (pseudo-speech) and musical domains and (2) how individual differences in residual acoustic hearing, sensitivity to voice cues (voice pitch, vocal tract length), and quality of life (QoL) might be associated with vocal emotion perception and, going a step further, also with musical emotion perception. In 28 adult CI users, with or without self-reported acoustic hearing, we showed that sensitivity (d’) scores for emotion categorization varied largely across the participants, in line with previous research. However, within participants, the d’ scores for vocal and musical emotion categorization were significantly correlated, indicating similar processing of auditory emotional cues across the pseudo-speech and music domains and robustness of the tests. Only for musical emotion perception, emotion d’ scores were higher in implant users with residual acoustic hearing compared to no acoustic hearing. The voice pitch perception did not significantly correlate with emotion categorization in either domain, while the vocal tract length significantly correlated in both domains. For QoL, only the subdomain of Speech production ability, but not the overall QoL scores, correlated with vocal emotion categorization, partially supporting previous findings. Taken together, results indicate that auditory emotion perception is challenging for some CI users, possibly a consequence of how available the emotion-related cues are via electric hearing. Improving these cues, either via rehabilitation or training, may also help auditory emotion perception in CI users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信