{"title":"树状时间的拓扑结构","authors":"Elizabeth Grennan Browning","doi":"10.1353/rah.2023.a926386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> The Topology of Tree Time <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Elizabeth Grennan Browning (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Jared Farmer</em>, <em>Elderflora: A Modern History of Ancient Trees</em>. New York: Basic Books, 2022. vii + 432 pp. Bibliography, notes, and indexes. $35.00. <p>Aristotle reasoned in 350 BCE: “since time cannot exist and is unthinkable apart from the now, and the now is a kind of middle-point, uniting as it does in itself both a beginning and an end, a beginning of future time and an end of past time, it follows that there must always be time.” His accounting of the structure of time was directly opposed to Plato’s; Aristotle singled Plato out as the sole philosopher who had argued for “the creation of time, saying that it is simultaneous with the world, and that the world came into being.”<sup>1</sup> Such an ancient debate begs the perpetual question: what is the topology of time, and why does this matter for the telling of history?</p> <p>Aristotle turned to plants to help understand the nature of existence across time: “[W]e must discover the reason why trees are of an enduring constitution….Plants continually renew themselves and hence last for a long time. New shoots continually come and the others grow old, and with the roots the same thing happens….Thus it continues, one part dying and the other growing, and hence also it lives a long time.”<sup>2</sup> Trees’ simultaneity of life and death spun into longevity has long inspired wonder about the nature of time and how humans experience it.</p> <p>Historians are in the business of creating timelines and delineating periodization—mapping important junctures where inflections of change and causality appear clearly, if only for a moment. These are linear topologies: in theory, the timeline extends both forward and backward, without end. Although, for the historians’ specialized training, this pure linear model is truncated, with a periodized beginning, middle, and end, allowing us to chart the evolution of social, political, economic, and environmental developments. Whether Aristotle’s argument holds up or not, historians rarely turn our gaze from the middle of our curated timelines to contemplate his core point—a refutation of the notion that there could be a beginning or end of time. As much as we push against the dangers of teleology, historians are wedded to the straight line in conceptualizing the passage of time: more often than not, <strong>[End Page 313]</strong> time’s continual sequencing is the unquestioned disciplinary foundation upon which we go about our work.</p> <p>In trying to make sense of the myriad abstractions of time, what can we learn from the oldest known living thing on Earth? Providing a masterful and lyrical account of the modern science of tree time, Jared Farmer’s <em>Elderflora: A Modern History of Ancient Trees</em> illuminates how our conceptualization of time is irrevocably tied to the natural world, and how our relationship with trees can help us imagine the ethics of resilient futures. Farmer offers a primer on how environmental historians should approach the precipice between the past and the future, and how we might address the impending sense of grief and existential dread that permeates this space in light of our ever-expanding knowledge about our changing climate and related intricacies of social and political change.</p> <p>I begin where Farmer ends, his benediction addressed to <em>Pinus longaeva</em> (Great Basin bristlecone pine): “May there never be older living things in the world, precisely known. May there always be timeful beings on Earth, with and without our knowing” (p. 360). Farmer’s parting words—which he acknowledges are a “forced ending” to his multifaceted (yet still unavoidably linear) narrative—invite the reader to discern the interspecies ethics stemming from the book’s vital questions about (as Donna Haraway phrased it) “staying with the trouble” of learning how humans and trees can live together and die together on a warming planet.<sup>3</sup> This benediction evokes Farmer’s broader goals for <em>Elderflora</em>: understanding the relationship between the scientific and the sacred; exploring the role that storytelling, memory, and nationalism play in framing this dynamic; and ultimately determining how to live ethically in a changing climate, when accruing more knowledge does not inevitably lead to a more just world for...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43597,"journal":{"name":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Topology of Tree Time\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Grennan Browning\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/rah.2023.a926386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> The Topology of Tree Time <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Elizabeth Grennan Browning (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Jared Farmer</em>, <em>Elderflora: A Modern History of Ancient Trees</em>. New York: Basic Books, 2022. vii + 432 pp. Bibliography, notes, and indexes. $35.00. <p>Aristotle reasoned in 350 BCE: “since time cannot exist and is unthinkable apart from the now, and the now is a kind of middle-point, uniting as it does in itself both a beginning and an end, a beginning of future time and an end of past time, it follows that there must always be time.” His accounting of the structure of time was directly opposed to Plato’s; Aristotle singled Plato out as the sole philosopher who had argued for “the creation of time, saying that it is simultaneous with the world, and that the world came into being.”<sup>1</sup> Such an ancient debate begs the perpetual question: what is the topology of time, and why does this matter for the telling of history?</p> <p>Aristotle turned to plants to help understand the nature of existence across time: “[W]e must discover the reason why trees are of an enduring constitution….Plants continually renew themselves and hence last for a long time. New shoots continually come and the others grow old, and with the roots the same thing happens….Thus it continues, one part dying and the other growing, and hence also it lives a long time.”<sup>2</sup> Trees’ simultaneity of life and death spun into longevity has long inspired wonder about the nature of time and how humans experience it.</p> <p>Historians are in the business of creating timelines and delineating periodization—mapping important junctures where inflections of change and causality appear clearly, if only for a moment. These are linear topologies: in theory, the timeline extends both forward and backward, without end. Although, for the historians’ specialized training, this pure linear model is truncated, with a periodized beginning, middle, and end, allowing us to chart the evolution of social, political, economic, and environmental developments. Whether Aristotle’s argument holds up or not, historians rarely turn our gaze from the middle of our curated timelines to contemplate his core point—a refutation of the notion that there could be a beginning or end of time. As much as we push against the dangers of teleology, historians are wedded to the straight line in conceptualizing the passage of time: more often than not, <strong>[End Page 313]</strong> time’s continual sequencing is the unquestioned disciplinary foundation upon which we go about our work.</p> <p>In trying to make sense of the myriad abstractions of time, what can we learn from the oldest known living thing on Earth? Providing a masterful and lyrical account of the modern science of tree time, Jared Farmer’s <em>Elderflora: A Modern History of Ancient Trees</em> illuminates how our conceptualization of time is irrevocably tied to the natural world, and how our relationship with trees can help us imagine the ethics of resilient futures. Farmer offers a primer on how environmental historians should approach the precipice between the past and the future, and how we might address the impending sense of grief and existential dread that permeates this space in light of our ever-expanding knowledge about our changing climate and related intricacies of social and political change.</p> <p>I begin where Farmer ends, his benediction addressed to <em>Pinus longaeva</em> (Great Basin bristlecone pine): “May there never be older living things in the world, precisely known. May there always be timeful beings on Earth, with and without our knowing” (p. 360). Farmer’s parting words—which he acknowledges are a “forced ending” to his multifaceted (yet still unavoidably linear) narrative—invite the reader to discern the interspecies ethics stemming from the book’s vital questions about (as Donna Haraway phrased it) “staying with the trouble” of learning how humans and trees can live together and die together on a warming planet.<sup>3</sup> This benediction evokes Farmer’s broader goals for <em>Elderflora</em>: understanding the relationship between the scientific and the sacred; exploring the role that storytelling, memory, and nationalism play in framing this dynamic; and ultimately determining how to live ethically in a changing climate, when accruing more knowledge does not inevitably lead to a more just world for...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a926386\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEWS IN AMERICAN HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rah.2023.a926386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
以下是内容摘录,以代替摘要: The Topology of Tree Time Elizabeth Grennan Browning (bio) Jared Farmer, Elderflora:古树的现代史》。纽约:vii + 432 页。参考书目、注释和索引。$35.00.亚里士多德在公元前 350 年推论道"既然时间不可能脱离现在而存在,也是不可想象的,而现在是一种中间点,它本身既是开始也是结束,既是未来时间的开始,也是过去时间的结束,那么,时间就必须永远存在"。他对时间结构的论述与柏拉图的论述直接对立;亚里士多德特别指出,柏拉图是唯一主张 "时间是被创造的,他说时间与世界同时存在,而世界是被创造的 "1 的哲学家。这样一场古老的辩论引出了一个永恒的问题:时间的拓扑结构是什么,为什么这与历史的叙述有关?亚里士多德求助于植物来帮助理解跨时间存在的本质:"我们必须发现树木之所以具有持久性的原因....,植物不断自我更新,因而能够长久存在。新芽不断长出,其他新芽不断变老,根部也是如此....,这样它就一直延续下去,一部分死亡,另一部分生长,因此它的寿命也很长。"2 树木的生死同时性与长寿相伴,长期以来一直激发着人们对时间本质以及人类如何体验时间的好奇。历史学家的工作是创建时间线和划分时期--绘制重要的时间节点,在这些节点上,变化和因果关系的拐点即使只是一瞬间,也会清晰地显现出来。这些都是线性拓扑结构:从理论上讲,时间线向前和向后延伸,没有终点。不过,由于历史学家的专业训练,这种纯粹的线性模型被截断了,有了按时期划分的开头、中间和结尾,使我们能够描绘出社会、政治、经济和环境发展的演变过程。无论亚里士多德的论点是否站得住脚,历史学家们很少将目光从我们策划的时间轴中间转向他的核心观点--驳斥时间可能有起点或终点的观点。尽管我们反对目的论的危险,但历史学家在构思时间的流逝时还是习惯于采用直线:[尾页 313]时间的持续排序往往是我们开展工作时毋庸置疑的学科基础。在试图理解时间的无数抽象概念时,我们能从地球上已知最古老的生物身上学到什么?贾里德-法默(Jared Farmer)的《古树现代史》(Elderflora:古树的现代史》揭示了我们的时间概念是如何与自然世界不可逆转地联系在一起的,以及我们与树木的关系是如何帮助我们想象具有韧性的未来的伦理的。法默提供了一个入门指南,告诉我们环境史学家应该如何面对过去与未来之间的悬崖,以及我们应该如何根据我们对不断变化的气候以及相关错综复杂的社会和政治变革的不断扩大的了解,解决弥漫在这一空间的即将到来的悲伤和生存恐惧感。我从法默结束的地方开始,他对大盆地刺松(Pinus longaeva)的祝福:"愿世界上永远没有更古老的生物,准确地说是已知的生物。愿地球上永远有时间的生命,无论我们知道与否"(第 360 页)。法默的临别赠言--他承认这是他多层面(但仍不可避免地是线性的)叙事的 "强迫性结局"--邀请读者去辨别源自书中重要问题的种间伦理(正如唐娜-哈拉维所说),即 "与麻烦共存",了解人类和树木如何在一个变暖的星球上共存亡。这一祝福唤起了法默对《上古之花》更广泛的目标:理解科学与神圣之间的关系;探索讲故事、记忆和民族主义在这一动态框架中所扮演的角色;以及最终确定如何在不断变化的气候中合乎伦理地生活,因为积累更多的知识并不必然会为人类带来一个更加公正的世界。
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:
The Topology of Tree Time
Elizabeth Grennan Browning (bio)
Jared Farmer, Elderflora: A Modern History of Ancient Trees. New York: Basic Books, 2022. vii + 432 pp. Bibliography, notes, and indexes. $35.00.
Aristotle reasoned in 350 BCE: “since time cannot exist and is unthinkable apart from the now, and the now is a kind of middle-point, uniting as it does in itself both a beginning and an end, a beginning of future time and an end of past time, it follows that there must always be time.” His accounting of the structure of time was directly opposed to Plato’s; Aristotle singled Plato out as the sole philosopher who had argued for “the creation of time, saying that it is simultaneous with the world, and that the world came into being.”1 Such an ancient debate begs the perpetual question: what is the topology of time, and why does this matter for the telling of history?
Aristotle turned to plants to help understand the nature of existence across time: “[W]e must discover the reason why trees are of an enduring constitution….Plants continually renew themselves and hence last for a long time. New shoots continually come and the others grow old, and with the roots the same thing happens….Thus it continues, one part dying and the other growing, and hence also it lives a long time.”2 Trees’ simultaneity of life and death spun into longevity has long inspired wonder about the nature of time and how humans experience it.
Historians are in the business of creating timelines and delineating periodization—mapping important junctures where inflections of change and causality appear clearly, if only for a moment. These are linear topologies: in theory, the timeline extends both forward and backward, without end. Although, for the historians’ specialized training, this pure linear model is truncated, with a periodized beginning, middle, and end, allowing us to chart the evolution of social, political, economic, and environmental developments. Whether Aristotle’s argument holds up or not, historians rarely turn our gaze from the middle of our curated timelines to contemplate his core point—a refutation of the notion that there could be a beginning or end of time. As much as we push against the dangers of teleology, historians are wedded to the straight line in conceptualizing the passage of time: more often than not, [End Page 313] time’s continual sequencing is the unquestioned disciplinary foundation upon which we go about our work.
In trying to make sense of the myriad abstractions of time, what can we learn from the oldest known living thing on Earth? Providing a masterful and lyrical account of the modern science of tree time, Jared Farmer’s Elderflora: A Modern History of Ancient Trees illuminates how our conceptualization of time is irrevocably tied to the natural world, and how our relationship with trees can help us imagine the ethics of resilient futures. Farmer offers a primer on how environmental historians should approach the precipice between the past and the future, and how we might address the impending sense of grief and existential dread that permeates this space in light of our ever-expanding knowledge about our changing climate and related intricacies of social and political change.
I begin where Farmer ends, his benediction addressed to Pinus longaeva (Great Basin bristlecone pine): “May there never be older living things in the world, precisely known. May there always be timeful beings on Earth, with and without our knowing” (p. 360). Farmer’s parting words—which he acknowledges are a “forced ending” to his multifaceted (yet still unavoidably linear) narrative—invite the reader to discern the interspecies ethics stemming from the book’s vital questions about (as Donna Haraway phrased it) “staying with the trouble” of learning how humans and trees can live together and die together on a warming planet.3 This benediction evokes Farmer’s broader goals for Elderflora: understanding the relationship between the scientific and the sacred; exploring the role that storytelling, memory, and nationalism play in framing this dynamic; and ultimately determining how to live ethically in a changing climate, when accruing more knowledge does not inevitably lead to a more just world for...
期刊介绍:
Reviews in American History provides an effective means for scholars and students of American history to stay up to date in their discipline. Each issue presents in-depth reviews of over thirty of the newest books in American history. Retrospective essays examining landmark works by major historians are also regularly featured. The journal covers all areas of American history including economics, military history, women in history, law, political history and philosophy, religion, social history, intellectual history, and cultural history. Readers can expect continued coverage of both traditional and new subjects of American history, always blending the recognition of recent developments with the ongoing importance of the core matter of the field.