Janessa M. Graves PhD, MPH, Shawna R. Beese PhD, RN, Demetrius A. Abshire PhD, RN, Kevin J. Bennett PhD, MS
{"title":"我们所有人》的农村地区有多大?将国家健康研究所 \"我们所有人 \"研究计划的农村参与者特征与其他国家数据来源进行比较","authors":"Janessa M. Graves PhD, MPH, Shawna R. Beese PhD, RN, Demetrius A. Abshire PhD, RN, Kevin J. Bennett PhD, MS","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The National Institute of Health's <i>All of Us</i> Research Program represents a national effort to develop a database to advance health research, especially among individuals historically underrepresented in research, including rural populations. The purpose of this study was to describe the rural populations identified in the <i>All of Us</i> Research Program using the only proxy measure currently available in the dataset.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Currently, the <i>All of Us</i> Research Program provides a proxy measure of rurality that identifies participants who self-reported delaying care due to far travel distances associated with living in rural areas. Using the <i>All of Us</i> Controlled Tier Dataset v6, we compared sociodemographic and health characteristics of <i>All of Us</i> rural participants identified via this proxy to rural US residents from nationally representative data sources using chi-squared tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>3.1% of 160,880 <i>All of Us</i> participants were rural, compared to 15%-20% of US residents based on commonly accepted rural definitions. Proportionally more rural <i>All of Us</i> participants reported fair or poor health status, history of cancer, and history of heart disease (<i>P</i><.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The <i>All of Us</i> measure may capture a subset of underserved participants who live in rural areas and experience health care access barriers due to distance. Researchers who use this proxy measure to characterize rurality should interpret their findings with caution due to differences in population and health characteristics using this proxy measure rural compared to other commonly used rural definitions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12840","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How rural is All of Us? Comparing characteristics of rural participants in the National Institute of Health's All of Us Research Program to other national data sources\",\"authors\":\"Janessa M. Graves PhD, MPH, Shawna R. Beese PhD, RN, Demetrius A. Abshire PhD, RN, Kevin J. Bennett PhD, MS\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>The National Institute of Health's <i>All of Us</i> Research Program represents a national effort to develop a database to advance health research, especially among individuals historically underrepresented in research, including rural populations. The purpose of this study was to describe the rural populations identified in the <i>All of Us</i> Research Program using the only proxy measure currently available in the dataset.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Currently, the <i>All of Us</i> Research Program provides a proxy measure of rurality that identifies participants who self-reported delaying care due to far travel distances associated with living in rural areas. Using the <i>All of Us</i> Controlled Tier Dataset v6, we compared sociodemographic and health characteristics of <i>All of Us</i> rural participants identified via this proxy to rural US residents from nationally representative data sources using chi-squared tests.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>3.1% of 160,880 <i>All of Us</i> participants were rural, compared to 15%-20% of US residents based on commonly accepted rural definitions. Proportionally more rural <i>All of Us</i> participants reported fair or poor health status, history of cancer, and history of heart disease (<i>P</i><.01).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The <i>All of Us</i> measure may capture a subset of underserved participants who live in rural areas and experience health care access barriers due to distance. Researchers who use this proxy measure to characterize rurality should interpret their findings with caution due to differences in population and health characteristics using this proxy measure rural compared to other commonly used rural definitions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12840\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12840\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12840","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的美国国家卫生研究院的 "我们所有人研究计划 "是一项全国性的工作,旨在开发一个数据库以推动健康研究,尤其是对研究人数历来不足的人群,包括农村人口的研究。目前,"我们所有人研究计划 "提供了一种农村人口的替代测量方法,用于识别那些自述因居住在农村地区路途遥远而延误治疗的参与者。通过使用 All of Us 控制层数据集 v6,我们使用卡方检验比较了通过该替代指标识别出的 All of Us 农村参与者的社会人口和健康特征,以及来自全国代表性数据源的美国农村居民的社会人口和健康特征。结论 "我们所有人 "衡量标准可能会捕捉到居住在农村地区、因距离远而享受不到医疗服务的参与者群体。与其他常用的农村定义相比,使用这一替代指标描述农村人口和健康特征的研究人员在解释研究结果时应谨慎。
How rural is All of Us? Comparing characteristics of rural participants in the National Institute of Health's All of Us Research Program to other national data sources
Purpose
The National Institute of Health's All of Us Research Program represents a national effort to develop a database to advance health research, especially among individuals historically underrepresented in research, including rural populations. The purpose of this study was to describe the rural populations identified in the All of Us Research Program using the only proxy measure currently available in the dataset.
Methods
Currently, the All of Us Research Program provides a proxy measure of rurality that identifies participants who self-reported delaying care due to far travel distances associated with living in rural areas. Using the All of Us Controlled Tier Dataset v6, we compared sociodemographic and health characteristics of All of Us rural participants identified via this proxy to rural US residents from nationally representative data sources using chi-squared tests.
Results
3.1% of 160,880 All of Us participants were rural, compared to 15%-20% of US residents based on commonly accepted rural definitions. Proportionally more rural All of Us participants reported fair or poor health status, history of cancer, and history of heart disease (P<.01).
Conclusions
The All of Us measure may capture a subset of underserved participants who live in rural areas and experience health care access barriers due to distance. Researchers who use this proxy measure to characterize rurality should interpret their findings with caution due to differences in population and health characteristics using this proxy measure rural compared to other commonly used rural definitions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.