取样设计对表层土壤指纹特征的影响

IF 2.8 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Maria Alejandra Luna Miño, Alexander J. Koiter, David A. Lobb
{"title":"取样设计对表层土壤指纹特征的影响","authors":"Maria Alejandra Luna Miño, Alexander J. Koiter, David A. Lobb","doi":"10.1007/s11368-024-03805-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The characterization of soil properties is an important part of many different types of agri-environmental research including inventory, comparison, and manipulation studies. Sediment source fingerprinting is a method that is increasingly being used to link sediment sources to downstream sediment. Characterization of sediment sources is a key part of this method as it serves as the base to identify and quantify soil properties (fingerprints) that can discriminate between sources. There is currently not a standard approach to characterizing sources and the different approaches to sampling have not been well assessed.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Grid (n = 49), transect (n = 14), and likely to erode (n = 8) sampling designs were used to characterize the geochemical, colour, grain size distribution, and soil organic matter content at two sites under contrasting land uses (agricultural and forested). The impact of the three sampling designs on characterization of fingerprint properties, the relationship between particle size and organic matter content on fingerprint properties, fingerprint selection, source discrimination, and mixing apportionment results were evaluated using a range of methods including 21 virtual mixtures.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The likely to erode design resulted in a unique fingerprint signature compared to the other two sampling designs. The correlation between particle size and organic matter varied between fingerprint, source, and sampling design. While the number and composition of the fingerprints selected varied between sampling designs there was a strong (100%) discrimination between sources regardless of the sampling approach. The maximum absolute difference between the virtual mixtures and the modeled proportions was 7.7%, 7.8%, and 8.9% for the grid, transect, and likely to erode sampling designs, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The likely to erode sampling design was not representative of the upslope areas as characterized by the grid and transect methods. Despite these differences the final apportionment results using virtual mixtures were qualitatively similar between the three sampling designs. Continued work at the watershed scale is needed to fully evaluate the importance of source sampling design on the sediment source fingerprinting approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":17139,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soils and Sediments","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of sampling design on characterizing surface soil fingerprinting properties\",\"authors\":\"Maria Alejandra Luna Miño, Alexander J. Koiter, David A. Lobb\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11368-024-03805-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Purpose</h3><p>The characterization of soil properties is an important part of many different types of agri-environmental research including inventory, comparison, and manipulation studies. Sediment source fingerprinting is a method that is increasingly being used to link sediment sources to downstream sediment. Characterization of sediment sources is a key part of this method as it serves as the base to identify and quantify soil properties (fingerprints) that can discriminate between sources. There is currently not a standard approach to characterizing sources and the different approaches to sampling have not been well assessed.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Grid (n = 49), transect (n = 14), and likely to erode (n = 8) sampling designs were used to characterize the geochemical, colour, grain size distribution, and soil organic matter content at two sites under contrasting land uses (agricultural and forested). The impact of the three sampling designs on characterization of fingerprint properties, the relationship between particle size and organic matter content on fingerprint properties, fingerprint selection, source discrimination, and mixing apportionment results were evaluated using a range of methods including 21 virtual mixtures.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The likely to erode design resulted in a unique fingerprint signature compared to the other two sampling designs. The correlation between particle size and organic matter varied between fingerprint, source, and sampling design. While the number and composition of the fingerprints selected varied between sampling designs there was a strong (100%) discrimination between sources regardless of the sampling approach. The maximum absolute difference between the virtual mixtures and the modeled proportions was 7.7%, 7.8%, and 8.9% for the grid, transect, and likely to erode sampling designs, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>The likely to erode sampling design was not representative of the upslope areas as characterized by the grid and transect methods. Despite these differences the final apportionment results using virtual mixtures were qualitatively similar between the three sampling designs. Continued work at the watershed scale is needed to fully evaluate the importance of source sampling design on the sediment source fingerprinting approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Soils and Sediments\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Soils and Sediments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-024-03805-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soils and Sediments","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-024-03805-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的土壤特性表征是许多不同类型的农业环境研究(包括清查、比较和操作研究)的重要组成部分。沉积物源指纹识别法越来越多地用于将沉积物源与下游沉积物联系起来。沉积物来源的特征描述是该方法的关键部分,因为它是识别和量化可区分来源的土壤特性(指纹)的基础。方法采用网格(n = 49)、横断面(n = 14)和可能侵蚀(n = 8)取样设计来描述两个土地用途截然不同的地点(农业和森林)的地球化学、颜色、粒度分布和土壤有机物含量。采用包括 21 种虚拟混合物在内的一系列方法,评估了三种取样设计对指纹特征的影响、粒度和有机质含量对指纹特征的影响、指纹选择、来源判别和混合分摊结果。粒度与有机物之间的相关性因指纹、来源和取样设计而异。虽然不同取样设计所选指纹的数量和组成各不相同,但无论采用哪种取样方法,都能很好地区分不同来源(100%)。在网格法、横断法和可能侵蚀法取样设计中,虚拟混合物与模型比例之间的最大绝对差异分别为 7.7%、7.8% 和 8.9%。尽管存在这些差异,但使用虚拟混合物得出的最终分配结果在本质上与三种取样设计相似。需要继续在流域范围内开展工作,以全面评估源取样设计对沉积物源指纹识别方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of sampling design on characterizing surface soil fingerprinting properties

Effect of sampling design on characterizing surface soil fingerprinting properties

Purpose

The characterization of soil properties is an important part of many different types of agri-environmental research including inventory, comparison, and manipulation studies. Sediment source fingerprinting is a method that is increasingly being used to link sediment sources to downstream sediment. Characterization of sediment sources is a key part of this method as it serves as the base to identify and quantify soil properties (fingerprints) that can discriminate between sources. There is currently not a standard approach to characterizing sources and the different approaches to sampling have not been well assessed.

Methods

Grid (n = 49), transect (n = 14), and likely to erode (n = 8) sampling designs were used to characterize the geochemical, colour, grain size distribution, and soil organic matter content at two sites under contrasting land uses (agricultural and forested). The impact of the three sampling designs on characterization of fingerprint properties, the relationship between particle size and organic matter content on fingerprint properties, fingerprint selection, source discrimination, and mixing apportionment results were evaluated using a range of methods including 21 virtual mixtures.

Results

The likely to erode design resulted in a unique fingerprint signature compared to the other two sampling designs. The correlation between particle size and organic matter varied between fingerprint, source, and sampling design. While the number and composition of the fingerprints selected varied between sampling designs there was a strong (100%) discrimination between sources regardless of the sampling approach. The maximum absolute difference between the virtual mixtures and the modeled proportions was 7.7%, 7.8%, and 8.9% for the grid, transect, and likely to erode sampling designs, respectively.

Conclusions

The likely to erode sampling design was not representative of the upslope areas as characterized by the grid and transect methods. Despite these differences the final apportionment results using virtual mixtures were qualitatively similar between the three sampling designs. Continued work at the watershed scale is needed to fully evaluate the importance of source sampling design on the sediment source fingerprinting approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Soils and Sediments
Journal of Soils and Sediments 环境科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
256
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Soils and Sediments (JSS) is devoted to soils and sediments; it deals with contaminated, intact and disturbed soils and sediments. JSS explores both the common aspects and the differences between these two environmental compartments. Inter-linkages at the catchment scale and with the Earth’s system (inter-compartment) are an important topic in JSS. The range of research coverage includes the effects of disturbances and contamination; research, strategies and technologies for prediction, prevention, and protection; identification and characterization; treatment, remediation and reuse; risk assessment and management; creation and implementation of quality standards; international regulation and legislation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信