具有定性和定量因素的设计的广义最小矩差

Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1002/sta4.684
Yao Xiao, Na Zou, Hong Qin, Kang Wang
{"title":"具有定性和定量因素的设计的广义最小矩差","authors":"Yao Xiao, Na Zou, Hong Qin, Kang Wang","doi":"10.1002/sta4.684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The minimum moment aberration and the minimum Lee‐moment aberration criteria are two popular conceptually simple and computationally cheap criteria for selecting good designs. However, the minimum moment aberration is suitable for qualitative factors, and the minimum Lee‐moment aberration cannot distinguish some designs with high‐level quantitative factors. In this paper, the minimum absolute‐moment aberration criterion is proposed to compare and select designs with multi‐level quantitative factors. We validate the statistical justifications of this criterion from theoretical and numerical aspects. Furthermore, we extend the minimum absolute‐moment aberration criterion into screening designs with both qualitative and quantitative factors, naming the new criterion as the minimum mixed‐moment aberration criterion. Then we utilise a numerical study to compare and evaluate the performance of some popular designs with both qualitative and quantitative factors in computer experiments.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalised minimum moment aberration for designs with both qualitative and quantitative factors\",\"authors\":\"Yao Xiao, Na Zou, Hong Qin, Kang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sta4.684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The minimum moment aberration and the minimum Lee‐moment aberration criteria are two popular conceptually simple and computationally cheap criteria for selecting good designs. However, the minimum moment aberration is suitable for qualitative factors, and the minimum Lee‐moment aberration cannot distinguish some designs with high‐level quantitative factors. In this paper, the minimum absolute‐moment aberration criterion is proposed to compare and select designs with multi‐level quantitative factors. We validate the statistical justifications of this criterion from theoretical and numerical aspects. Furthermore, we extend the minimum absolute‐moment aberration criterion into screening designs with both qualitative and quantitative factors, naming the new criterion as the minimum mixed‐moment aberration criterion. Then we utilise a numerical study to compare and evaluate the performance of some popular designs with both qualitative and quantitative factors in computer experiments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sta4.684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最小力矩畸变和最小李矩畸变准则是两种常用的选择优秀设计的准则,它们概念简单,计算成本低廉。然而,最小矩差适用于定性因子,而最小李矩差则无法区分一些具有高级定量因子的设计。本文提出了最小绝对矩差准则,用于比较和选择具有多级定量因子的设计。我们从理论和数值方面验证了这一标准的统计合理性。此外,我们还将最小绝对矩差准则扩展到同时筛选定性和定量因素的设计,并将新准则命名为最小混合矩差准则。然后,我们利用数值研究,在计算机实验中比较和评估了一些同时具有定性和定量因素的流行设计的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Generalised minimum moment aberration for designs with both qualitative and quantitative factors
The minimum moment aberration and the minimum Lee‐moment aberration criteria are two popular conceptually simple and computationally cheap criteria for selecting good designs. However, the minimum moment aberration is suitable for qualitative factors, and the minimum Lee‐moment aberration cannot distinguish some designs with high‐level quantitative factors. In this paper, the minimum absolute‐moment aberration criterion is proposed to compare and select designs with multi‐level quantitative factors. We validate the statistical justifications of this criterion from theoretical and numerical aspects. Furthermore, we extend the minimum absolute‐moment aberration criterion into screening designs with both qualitative and quantitative factors, naming the new criterion as the minimum mixed‐moment aberration criterion. Then we utilise a numerical study to compare and evaluate the performance of some popular designs with both qualitative and quantitative factors in computer experiments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信