市场上销售的牙齿矫正产品网站所含信息的质量和准确性评估:横断面调查

Maurice J. Meade, Sven Jensen, Xiangqun Ju, David Hunter, Lisa Jamieson
{"title":"市场上销售的牙齿矫正产品网站所含信息的质量和准确性评估:横断面调查","authors":"Maurice J. Meade, Sven Jensen, Xiangqun Ju, David Hunter, Lisa Jamieson","doi":"10.2319/100423-672.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>Objectives</div><p>To assess the quality and accuracy of information contained within the websites of providers of marketed orthodontic products.</p><div>Materials and Methods</div><p>Twenty-one websites of orthodontic appliance and adjunct (product) providers were identified. The website content was assessed via two validated quality-of-information instruments (DISCERN and the <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em> [JAMA] benchmarks) and an accuracy-of-information instrument. Website content was qualitatively analyzed for themes and subthemes.</p><div>Results</div><p>More than half (n = 11; 52.3%) of the assessed websites contained clinician testimonials. The mean (SD) DISCERN score was 33.14 (5.44). No website recorded the minimum of three JAMA benchmarks required to indicate reliability. The most common content themes related to quality-of-life impact and treatment duration. Just 8% of the statements within the websites were objectively true. The Pearson correlation coefficient indicated that the DISCERN scores were correlated with the accuracy-of-information scores (<em>r</em> = .83; <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</p><div>Conclusions</div><p>The quality and accuracy of information contained within the websites of the providers of marketed orthodontic products was poor. The combined use of DISCERN and the accuracy-of-information instrument may help overcome the shortcomings of each. Clinicians should check the accuracy of information on orthodontic product provider websites before adding links to those websites on their own sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the quality and accuracy of information contained within the websites of marketed orthodontic products: a cross-sectional investigation\",\"authors\":\"Maurice J. Meade, Sven Jensen, Xiangqun Ju, David Hunter, Lisa Jamieson\",\"doi\":\"10.2319/100423-672.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>Objectives</div><p>To assess the quality and accuracy of information contained within the websites of providers of marketed orthodontic products.</p><div>Materials and Methods</div><p>Twenty-one websites of orthodontic appliance and adjunct (product) providers were identified. The website content was assessed via two validated quality-of-information instruments (DISCERN and the <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em> [JAMA] benchmarks) and an accuracy-of-information instrument. Website content was qualitatively analyzed for themes and subthemes.</p><div>Results</div><p>More than half (n = 11; 52.3%) of the assessed websites contained clinician testimonials. The mean (SD) DISCERN score was 33.14 (5.44). No website recorded the minimum of three JAMA benchmarks required to indicate reliability. The most common content themes related to quality-of-life impact and treatment duration. Just 8% of the statements within the websites were objectively true. The Pearson correlation coefficient indicated that the DISCERN scores were correlated with the accuracy-of-information scores (<em>r</em> = .83; <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</p><div>Conclusions</div><p>The quality and accuracy of information contained within the websites of the providers of marketed orthodontic products was poor. The combined use of DISCERN and the accuracy-of-information instrument may help overcome the shortcomings of each. Clinicians should check the accuracy of information on orthodontic product provider websites before adding links to those websites on their own sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2319/100423-672.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/100423-672.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料和方法确定了 21 家正畸器械和辅助设备(产品)提供商的网站。网站内容通过两个经过验证的信息质量工具(DISCERN 和《美国医学会杂志》[JAMA] 基准)和一个信息准确性工具进行评估。对网站内容的主题和次主题进行了定性分析。结果 在接受评估的网站中,有一半以上(n = 11;52.3%)包含临床医生的推荐信。DISCERN 评分的平均值(标清)为 33.14 (5.44)。没有一家网站达到了表明可靠性所需的至少三项 JAMA 基准。最常见的内容主题涉及对生活质量的影响和治疗持续时间。网站中仅有 8% 的陈述是客观真实的。皮尔逊相关系数表明,DISCERN 分数与信息准确性分数相关(r = .83; P < .001)。结论市场上销售的正畸产品提供商的网站所含信息的质量和准确性很差。结合使用 DISCERN 和信息准确性工具可能有助于克服各自的缺点。临床医生在自己的网站上添加与正畸产品供应商网站的链接之前,应该检查这些网站信息的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the quality and accuracy of information contained within the websites of marketed orthodontic products: a cross-sectional investigation
Objectives

To assess the quality and accuracy of information contained within the websites of providers of marketed orthodontic products.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-one websites of orthodontic appliance and adjunct (product) providers were identified. The website content was assessed via two validated quality-of-information instruments (DISCERN and the Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA] benchmarks) and an accuracy-of-information instrument. Website content was qualitatively analyzed for themes and subthemes.

Results

More than half (n = 11; 52.3%) of the assessed websites contained clinician testimonials. The mean (SD) DISCERN score was 33.14 (5.44). No website recorded the minimum of three JAMA benchmarks required to indicate reliability. The most common content themes related to quality-of-life impact and treatment duration. Just 8% of the statements within the websites were objectively true. The Pearson correlation coefficient indicated that the DISCERN scores were correlated with the accuracy-of-information scores (r = .83; P < .001).

Conclusions

The quality and accuracy of information contained within the websites of the providers of marketed orthodontic products was poor. The combined use of DISCERN and the accuracy-of-information instrument may help overcome the shortcomings of each. Clinicians should check the accuracy of information on orthodontic product provider websites before adding links to those websites on their own sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信