信任专家工作中的智能自动化:会计从业人员的经验和看法

Saara Ala-Luopa, Thomas Olsson, Kaisa Väänänen, Maria Hartikainen, Jouko Makkonen
{"title":"信任专家工作中的智能自动化:会计从业人员的经验和看法","authors":"Saara Ala-Luopa, Thomas Olsson, Kaisa Väänänen, Maria Hartikainen, Jouko Makkonen","doi":"10.1007/s10606-024-09499-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>AI-based applications are increasingly used in knowledge-intensive expert work, which has led to a discussion regarding their trustworthiness, i.e., to which degree these applications are ethical and reliable. While trust in technology is an important aspect of using and accepting novel information systems, little is known about domain experts’ trust in machine learning systems in their work. To provide a real-life, empirical perspective on the topic, this study reports findings from an interview study of accounting practitioners’ (<i>N</i> = 9) trust in intelligent automation in their work. The findings underline the holistic nature of trust, suggesting that contextual and social aspects, such as participatory design practices, shape domain experts’ trust in intelligent automation. For instance, the participants emphasize their contribution to product development and open communication with the system developers. In addition, the findings shed light on the characteristics of domain experts as technology users, such as the necessity of situation-specific expert knowledge when evaluating the systems’ reliability. Thus, our findings suggest that trust in intelligent automation manifests at different levels, both in human-AI interaction and interpersonal communication and collaboration. This research contributes to the existing literature on trust in technology, especially AI-powered applications, by providing insights into trust in intelligent automation in expert work.</p>","PeriodicalId":516522,"journal":{"name":"Computer Supported Cooperative Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trusting Intelligent Automation in Expert Work: Accounting Practitioners’ Experiences and Perceptions\",\"authors\":\"Saara Ala-Luopa, Thomas Olsson, Kaisa Väänänen, Maria Hartikainen, Jouko Makkonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10606-024-09499-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>AI-based applications are increasingly used in knowledge-intensive expert work, which has led to a discussion regarding their trustworthiness, i.e., to which degree these applications are ethical and reliable. While trust in technology is an important aspect of using and accepting novel information systems, little is known about domain experts’ trust in machine learning systems in their work. To provide a real-life, empirical perspective on the topic, this study reports findings from an interview study of accounting practitioners’ (<i>N</i> = 9) trust in intelligent automation in their work. The findings underline the holistic nature of trust, suggesting that contextual and social aspects, such as participatory design practices, shape domain experts’ trust in intelligent automation. For instance, the participants emphasize their contribution to product development and open communication with the system developers. In addition, the findings shed light on the characteristics of domain experts as technology users, such as the necessity of situation-specific expert knowledge when evaluating the systems’ reliability. Thus, our findings suggest that trust in intelligent automation manifests at different levels, both in human-AI interaction and interpersonal communication and collaboration. This research contributes to the existing literature on trust in technology, especially AI-powered applications, by providing insights into trust in intelligent automation in expert work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Supported Cooperative Work\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Supported Cooperative Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-024-09499-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Supported Cooperative Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-024-09499-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于人工智能的应用程序越来越多地用于知识密集型的专家工作中,这引发了有关其可信度的讨论,即这些应用程序在多大程度上是合乎道德和可靠的。虽然对技术的信任是使用和接受新型信息系统的一个重要方面,但人们对领域专家在工作中对机器学习系统的信任却知之甚少。为了从现实生活中的经验角度来探讨这一话题,本研究报告了对会计从业人员(9 人)在工作中对智能自动化的信任度进行访谈研究的结果。研究结果强调了信任的整体性,表明参与式设计实践等环境和社会因素影响着领域专家对智能自动化的信任。例如,参与者强调他们对产品开发的贡献以及与系统开发人员的坦诚交流。此外,研究结果还揭示了作为技术用户的领域专家的特点,例如在评估系统可靠性时,特定情况下专家知识的必要性。因此,我们的研究结果表明,对智能自动化的信任表现在不同层面,既包括人与人工智能的互动,也包括人与人之间的交流与合作。本研究通过深入探讨专家工作中对智能自动化的信任,为有关技术信任(尤其是人工智能驱动的应用)的现有文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trusting Intelligent Automation in Expert Work: Accounting Practitioners’ Experiences and Perceptions

AI-based applications are increasingly used in knowledge-intensive expert work, which has led to a discussion regarding their trustworthiness, i.e., to which degree these applications are ethical and reliable. While trust in technology is an important aspect of using and accepting novel information systems, little is known about domain experts’ trust in machine learning systems in their work. To provide a real-life, empirical perspective on the topic, this study reports findings from an interview study of accounting practitioners’ (N = 9) trust in intelligent automation in their work. The findings underline the holistic nature of trust, suggesting that contextual and social aspects, such as participatory design practices, shape domain experts’ trust in intelligent automation. For instance, the participants emphasize their contribution to product development and open communication with the system developers. In addition, the findings shed light on the characteristics of domain experts as technology users, such as the necessity of situation-specific expert knowledge when evaluating the systems’ reliability. Thus, our findings suggest that trust in intelligent automation manifests at different levels, both in human-AI interaction and interpersonal communication and collaboration. This research contributes to the existing literature on trust in technology, especially AI-powered applications, by providing insights into trust in intelligent automation in expert work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信