澳大利亚维多利亚州预防和康复护理服务对住院影响的纵向研究

Lisa Brophy, Justine Fletcher, Shrinkhala Dawadi, John Reece, Vrinda Edan, Joanne Enticott, John Farhall, Ellie Fossey, Bridget Hamilton, Carol Harvey, Graham Meadows, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Emma Morrisroe, Richard Newton, Victoria Palmer, Ruth Vine, Shifra Waks, Jane Pirkis
{"title":"澳大利亚维多利亚州预防和康复护理服务对住院影响的纵向研究","authors":"Lisa Brophy, Justine Fletcher, Shrinkhala Dawadi, John Reece, Vrinda Edan, Joanne Enticott, John Farhall, Ellie Fossey, Bridget Hamilton, Carol Harvey, Graham Meadows, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Emma Morrisroe, Richard Newton, Victoria Palmer, Ruth Vine, Shifra Waks, Jane Pirkis","doi":"10.1177/00048674241242943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Prevention and Recovery Care services are residential sub-acute services in Victoria, Australia, guided by a commitment to recovery-oriented practice. The evidence regarding the effectiveness of this service model is limited, largely relying on small, localised evaluations. This study involved a state-wide investigation into the personal recovery, perceived needs for care, well-being and quality-of-life outcomes experienced by Prevention and Recovery Care services’ consumers.Methods:A longitudinal cohort design examined the trajectory of self-reported personal recovery and other outcomes for consumers in 19 Victorian Prevention and Recovery Care services over 4 time points (T1 – 1 week after admission; T2 – within 1 week of discharge; T3 – 6 months after discharge; T4 – 12 months after discharge). T2–T4 time frames were extended by approximately 3 weeks due to recruitment challenges. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery was the primary outcome measure.Results:At T1, 298 consumers were recruited. By T4, 114 remained in the study. Participants scored higher on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery at all three time points after T1. There were also sustained improvements on all secondary outcome measures. Improvements were then sustained at each subsequent post-intervention time point. Community inclusion and having needs for care met also improved.Conclusion:The findings provide a consistent picture of benefits for consumers using Prevention and Recovery Care services, with significant improvement in personal recovery, quality of life, mental health and well-being following an admission to a Prevention and Recovery Care service. Further attention needs to be given to how to sustain the gains made through a Prevention and Recovery Care service admission in the long term.","PeriodicalId":8576,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A longitudinal study of the impacts of a stay in a Prevention and Recovery Care service in Victoria, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Brophy, Justine Fletcher, Shrinkhala Dawadi, John Reece, Vrinda Edan, Joanne Enticott, John Farhall, Ellie Fossey, Bridget Hamilton, Carol Harvey, Graham Meadows, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Emma Morrisroe, Richard Newton, Victoria Palmer, Ruth Vine, Shifra Waks, Jane Pirkis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00048674241242943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Prevention and Recovery Care services are residential sub-acute services in Victoria, Australia, guided by a commitment to recovery-oriented practice. The evidence regarding the effectiveness of this service model is limited, largely relying on small, localised evaluations. This study involved a state-wide investigation into the personal recovery, perceived needs for care, well-being and quality-of-life outcomes experienced by Prevention and Recovery Care services’ consumers.Methods:A longitudinal cohort design examined the trajectory of self-reported personal recovery and other outcomes for consumers in 19 Victorian Prevention and Recovery Care services over 4 time points (T1 – 1 week after admission; T2 – within 1 week of discharge; T3 – 6 months after discharge; T4 – 12 months after discharge). T2–T4 time frames were extended by approximately 3 weeks due to recruitment challenges. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery was the primary outcome measure.Results:At T1, 298 consumers were recruited. By T4, 114 remained in the study. Participants scored higher on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery at all three time points after T1. There were also sustained improvements on all secondary outcome measures. Improvements were then sustained at each subsequent post-intervention time point. Community inclusion and having needs for care met also improved.Conclusion:The findings provide a consistent picture of benefits for consumers using Prevention and Recovery Care services, with significant improvement in personal recovery, quality of life, mental health and well-being following an admission to a Prevention and Recovery Care service. Further attention needs to be given to how to sustain the gains made through a Prevention and Recovery Care service admission in the long term.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674241242943\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674241242943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预防和康复护理服务是澳大利亚维多利亚州的一种住院亚急性服务,以致力于康复为导向的实践为指导。有关这种服务模式有效性的证据很有限,主要依赖于小规模的本地化评估。本研究在全州范围内调查了预防和康复护理服务的消费者所经历的个人康复、感知到的护理需求、福祉和生活质量成果。方法:采用纵向队列设计,在 4 个时间点(T1 - 入院后 1 周;T2 - 出院后 1 周内;T3 - 出院后 6 个月;T4 - 出院后 12 个月)检查了 19 个维多利亚预防和康复护理服务的消费者自我报告的个人康复轨迹和其他成果。由于招募方面的困难,T2-T4 时间框架延长了约 3 周。结果:在 T1 阶段,共招募了 298 名患者。结果:在 T1 阶段,共招募了 298 名消费者,到 T4 阶段,仍有 114 人参与研究。在 T1 之后的三个时间点,参与者在康复过程问卷上的得分都有所提高。在所有次要结果测量中,参与者的得分都有持续提高。在干预后的每个时间点,改善情况都得到了保持。结论:研究结果一致表明,使用预防和康复护理服务的患者在个人康复、生活质量、心理健康和幸福感方面都有显著改善。需要进一步关注的是,如何长期保持预防和康复护理服务所带来的收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A longitudinal study of the impacts of a stay in a Prevention and Recovery Care service in Victoria, Australia
Background:Prevention and Recovery Care services are residential sub-acute services in Victoria, Australia, guided by a commitment to recovery-oriented practice. The evidence regarding the effectiveness of this service model is limited, largely relying on small, localised evaluations. This study involved a state-wide investigation into the personal recovery, perceived needs for care, well-being and quality-of-life outcomes experienced by Prevention and Recovery Care services’ consumers.Methods:A longitudinal cohort design examined the trajectory of self-reported personal recovery and other outcomes for consumers in 19 Victorian Prevention and Recovery Care services over 4 time points (T1 – 1 week after admission; T2 – within 1 week of discharge; T3 – 6 months after discharge; T4 – 12 months after discharge). T2–T4 time frames were extended by approximately 3 weeks due to recruitment challenges. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery was the primary outcome measure.Results:At T1, 298 consumers were recruited. By T4, 114 remained in the study. Participants scored higher on the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery at all three time points after T1. There were also sustained improvements on all secondary outcome measures. Improvements were then sustained at each subsequent post-intervention time point. Community inclusion and having needs for care met also improved.Conclusion:The findings provide a consistent picture of benefits for consumers using Prevention and Recovery Care services, with significant improvement in personal recovery, quality of life, mental health and well-being following an admission to a Prevention and Recovery Care service. Further attention needs to be given to how to sustain the gains made through a Prevention and Recovery Care service admission in the long term.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信