探讨伊朗 EFL 学习者的议论文写作策略现状和问题

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Omid Mallahi
{"title":"探讨伊朗 EFL 学习者的议论文写作策略现状和问题","authors":"Omid Mallahi","doi":"10.1186/s40862-023-00241-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present study explores the status of argumentative essay writing strategy use and identifies the problems a convenient sample of Iranian EFL learners face while writing argumentative essays in English. Adopting a complementary process-genre approach and a mixed-methods research design, the researcher designed a genre-specific argumentative essay-writing strategy use questionnaire and pilot-tested it in an essay-writing course. The necessary data were collected using the designed questionnaire, students' argumentative texts written in the classes and their responses to the open-ended survey and semi-structured interviews. The results indicated a rather low status of strategy use in the sample since the students mostly depended on their previous writing competencies rather than following the conventions of working on this new genre of writing. The results of the open-ended survey, semi-structured interviews, and the analyses of students' argumentative texts indicated significant problems in the students' essay writing performance, categorized as cognitive, linguistic and discourse, and psychological problems, which were further attributed to the newness and complexities imposed by this genre of writing, students’ inadequate linguistic and discourse competence and their inefficient use of writing strategies. Finally, it was suggested that to assist the students in writing better argumentative texts, writing instructors must ensure students have a fundamental understanding of what an argument is, including the components like claims, evidence, warrants and counterarguments, and encourage critical thinking by teaching students how to evaluate evidence, find logical fallacies and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of different arguments. They also need to share well-written argumentative essays as models for students to analyze and learn from, incorporate strategy instruction in their practices, offer further opportunities for writing and practicing in this genre of writing, and provide appropriate scaffolding and timely feedback on the students’ argumentative writing performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":36383,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the status of argumentative essay writing strategies and problems of Iranian EFL learners\",\"authors\":\"Omid Mallahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40862-023-00241-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present study explores the status of argumentative essay writing strategy use and identifies the problems a convenient sample of Iranian EFL learners face while writing argumentative essays in English. Adopting a complementary process-genre approach and a mixed-methods research design, the researcher designed a genre-specific argumentative essay-writing strategy use questionnaire and pilot-tested it in an essay-writing course. The necessary data were collected using the designed questionnaire, students' argumentative texts written in the classes and their responses to the open-ended survey and semi-structured interviews. The results indicated a rather low status of strategy use in the sample since the students mostly depended on their previous writing competencies rather than following the conventions of working on this new genre of writing. The results of the open-ended survey, semi-structured interviews, and the analyses of students' argumentative texts indicated significant problems in the students' essay writing performance, categorized as cognitive, linguistic and discourse, and psychological problems, which were further attributed to the newness and complexities imposed by this genre of writing, students’ inadequate linguistic and discourse competence and their inefficient use of writing strategies. Finally, it was suggested that to assist the students in writing better argumentative texts, writing instructors must ensure students have a fundamental understanding of what an argument is, including the components like claims, evidence, warrants and counterarguments, and encourage critical thinking by teaching students how to evaluate evidence, find logical fallacies and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of different arguments. They also need to share well-written argumentative essays as models for students to analyze and learn from, incorporate strategy instruction in their practices, offer further opportunities for writing and practicing in this genre of writing, and provide appropriate scaffolding and timely feedback on the students’ argumentative writing performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00241-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00241-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了议论文写作策略的使用状况,并确定了伊朗 EFL 学习者在用英语写作议论文时所面临的问题。研究者采用过程-体裁互补法和混合方法研究设计,设计了一份针对特定体裁的议论文写作策略使用问卷,并在一门议论文写作课程中进行了试点测试。研究人员利用设计的问卷、学生在课堂上撰写的议论文以及他们对开放式调查和半结构式访谈的回答收集了必要的数据。结果表明,样本中学生的写作策略使用率相当低,因为他们大多依赖于自己以前的写作能力,而不是按照惯例来处理这种新的写作体裁。开放式调查、半结构式访谈和对学生议论文的分析结果表明,学生在论文写作中存在认知、语言、话语和心理等方面的显著问题,而这些问题又归因于这种写作体裁的新颖性和复杂性、学生语言和话语能力的不足以及写作策略的低效使用。最后,有专家建议,为了帮助学生写出更好的议论文,写作指导教师必须确保学生从根本上理解什么是议论,包括主张、证据、论据和反论据等组成部分,并通过教导学生如何评估证据、发现逻辑谬误和分析不同论据的优缺点来鼓励学生的批判性思维。他们还需要分享写得好的议论文作为范文,供学生分析和学习,在实践中融入策略指导,为学生提供更多写作和练习这种写作体裁的机会,并为学生的议论文写作表现提供适当的支架和及时的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring the status of argumentative essay writing strategies and problems of Iranian EFL learners

Exploring the status of argumentative essay writing strategies and problems of Iranian EFL learners

The present study explores the status of argumentative essay writing strategy use and identifies the problems a convenient sample of Iranian EFL learners face while writing argumentative essays in English. Adopting a complementary process-genre approach and a mixed-methods research design, the researcher designed a genre-specific argumentative essay-writing strategy use questionnaire and pilot-tested it in an essay-writing course. The necessary data were collected using the designed questionnaire, students' argumentative texts written in the classes and their responses to the open-ended survey and semi-structured interviews. The results indicated a rather low status of strategy use in the sample since the students mostly depended on their previous writing competencies rather than following the conventions of working on this new genre of writing. The results of the open-ended survey, semi-structured interviews, and the analyses of students' argumentative texts indicated significant problems in the students' essay writing performance, categorized as cognitive, linguistic and discourse, and psychological problems, which were further attributed to the newness and complexities imposed by this genre of writing, students’ inadequate linguistic and discourse competence and their inefficient use of writing strategies. Finally, it was suggested that to assist the students in writing better argumentative texts, writing instructors must ensure students have a fundamental understanding of what an argument is, including the components like claims, evidence, warrants and counterarguments, and encourage critical thinking by teaching students how to evaluate evidence, find logical fallacies and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of different arguments. They also need to share well-written argumentative essays as models for students to analyze and learn from, incorporate strategy instruction in their practices, offer further opportunities for writing and practicing in this genre of writing, and provide appropriate scaffolding and timely feedback on the students’ argumentative writing performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education
Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信