通过多种机制和途径检测和预测肝毒性的拟议体外细胞毒性测试电池:小视图

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Saura C. Sahu
{"title":"通过多种机制和途径检测和预测肝毒性的拟议体外细胞毒性测试电池:小视图","authors":"Saura C. Sahu","doi":"10.1002/jat.4619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The 21st-century toxicity testing program recommends the use of cytotoxicity data from human cells in culture for rapid in vitro screening focusing on biological pathways of potential toxicants to predict in vivo toxicity. Liver is the major organ for both endogenous and exogenous chemical metabolism of xenobiotics. Therefore, this review was undertaken to evaluate side by side five different currently used commercial cytotoxicity assay kits for purpose of rapid predictive screening of potential hepatotoxicants. The test compounds for this review were selected from the NIH LiverTox and FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base (LTKB) databases. Human liver HepG2, HepaRG, and rat liver Clone 9 cell cultures were used as the in vitro liver models. Five commercial assay kits representing different biomarkers or pathways were selected for this review. These kits are Vita-Orange Cell Viability Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich), CellTiter-Glo Cell Viability Assay Kit (Promega), CytoTox-ONE Homogeneous Membrane Integrity Assay Kit (Promega), DNA Quantitation Fluorescence Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich), and Neutral Red Based In Vitro Toxicology Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). This review found that these kits can all be used for rapid predictive cytotoxicity screening of potential hepatotoxicants in human liver HepG2 and rat liver Clone 9 cells in culture as in vitro liver models without compromising quality and accuracy of endpoint measurements as well as the length of toxicity screening time. Unraveling the structure–activity relationship of potential hepatotoxins would help to classify their hepatotoxic effects. Therefore, in addition to the current regulatory hepatotoxicity testing strategies, development and regulatory approval of hepatotoxins need to be discussed in order to identify potential gaps in the safety assessment. The overall results of our study support the hypothesis that a battery of rapid, simple, and reliable assays is an excellent tool for predicting in vivo effects of suspected liver toxins. The human liver HepaRG cells do not appear to be an ideal in vitro liver model for this purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":15242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","volume":"44 12","pages":"1868-1873"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A proposed in vitro cytotoxicity test battery to detect and predict hepatotoxicity via multiple mechanisms and pathways: a minireview\",\"authors\":\"Saura C. Sahu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jat.4619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The 21st-century toxicity testing program recommends the use of cytotoxicity data from human cells in culture for rapid in vitro screening focusing on biological pathways of potential toxicants to predict in vivo toxicity. Liver is the major organ for both endogenous and exogenous chemical metabolism of xenobiotics. Therefore, this review was undertaken to evaluate side by side five different currently used commercial cytotoxicity assay kits for purpose of rapid predictive screening of potential hepatotoxicants. The test compounds for this review were selected from the NIH LiverTox and FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base (LTKB) databases. Human liver HepG2, HepaRG, and rat liver Clone 9 cell cultures were used as the in vitro liver models. Five commercial assay kits representing different biomarkers or pathways were selected for this review. These kits are Vita-Orange Cell Viability Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich), CellTiter-Glo Cell Viability Assay Kit (Promega), CytoTox-ONE Homogeneous Membrane Integrity Assay Kit (Promega), DNA Quantitation Fluorescence Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich), and Neutral Red Based In Vitro Toxicology Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). This review found that these kits can all be used for rapid predictive cytotoxicity screening of potential hepatotoxicants in human liver HepG2 and rat liver Clone 9 cells in culture as in vitro liver models without compromising quality and accuracy of endpoint measurements as well as the length of toxicity screening time. Unraveling the structure–activity relationship of potential hepatotoxins would help to classify their hepatotoxic effects. Therefore, in addition to the current regulatory hepatotoxicity testing strategies, development and regulatory approval of hepatotoxins need to be discussed in order to identify potential gaps in the safety assessment. The overall results of our study support the hypothesis that a battery of rapid, simple, and reliable assays is an excellent tool for predicting in vivo effects of suspected liver toxins. The human liver HepaRG cells do not appear to be an ideal in vitro liver model for this purpose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"44 12\",\"pages\":\"1868-1873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jat.4619\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jat.4619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

21 世纪毒性测试计划建议使用培养人体细胞的细胞毒性数据进行快速体外筛选,重点关注潜在毒性物质的生物途径,以预测体内毒性。肝脏是异种生物进行内源性和外源性化学代谢的主要器官。因此,本综述对目前使用的五种不同的商业细胞毒性检测试剂盒进行了并行评估,以便对潜在的肝毒性物质进行快速预测性筛选。本综述的测试化合物选自美国国立卫生研究院肝脏毒性数据库(NIH LiverTox)和美国食品和药物管理局肝脏毒性知识库(LTKB)。人类肝脏 HepG2、HepaRG 和大鼠肝脏克隆 9 细胞培养物被用作体外肝脏模型。本综述选择了代表不同生物标记物或途径的五种商业检测试剂盒。这些试剂盒是 Vita-Orange 细胞活力检测试剂盒(Sigma-Aldrich)、CellTiter-Glo 细胞活力检测试剂盒(Promega)、CytoTox-ONE 均相膜完整性检测试剂盒(Promega)、DNA 定量荧光检测试剂盒(Sigma-Aldrich)和中性红体外毒理学检测试剂盒(Sigma-Aldrich)。本综述发现,这些试剂盒均可用于在作为体外肝脏模型培养的人肝 HepG2 细胞和大鼠肝克隆 9 细胞中对潜在肝毒性物质进行快速预测性细胞毒性筛选,而不会影响终点测量的质量和准确性以及毒性筛选时间的长短。揭示潜在肝毒素的结构-活性关系有助于对其肝毒性效应进行分类。因此,除了现行的监管肝毒性测试策略外,还需要对肝毒素的开发和监管审批进行讨论,以找出安全性评估中的潜在差距。我们研究的总体结果支持这一假设,即一系列快速、简单、可靠的检测方法是预测可疑肝脏毒素体内效应的绝佳工具。人类肝脏 HepaRG 细胞似乎并不是一个理想的体外肝脏模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A proposed in vitro cytotoxicity test battery to detect and predict hepatotoxicity via multiple mechanisms and pathways: a minireview

The 21st-century toxicity testing program recommends the use of cytotoxicity data from human cells in culture for rapid in vitro screening focusing on biological pathways of potential toxicants to predict in vivo toxicity. Liver is the major organ for both endogenous and exogenous chemical metabolism of xenobiotics. Therefore, this review was undertaken to evaluate side by side five different currently used commercial cytotoxicity assay kits for purpose of rapid predictive screening of potential hepatotoxicants. The test compounds for this review were selected from the NIH LiverTox and FDA Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base (LTKB) databases. Human liver HepG2, HepaRG, and rat liver Clone 9 cell cultures were used as the in vitro liver models. Five commercial assay kits representing different biomarkers or pathways were selected for this review. These kits are Vita-Orange Cell Viability Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich), CellTiter-Glo Cell Viability Assay Kit (Promega), CytoTox-ONE Homogeneous Membrane Integrity Assay Kit (Promega), DNA Quantitation Fluorescence Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich), and Neutral Red Based In Vitro Toxicology Assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich). This review found that these kits can all be used for rapid predictive cytotoxicity screening of potential hepatotoxicants in human liver HepG2 and rat liver Clone 9 cells in culture as in vitro liver models without compromising quality and accuracy of endpoint measurements as well as the length of toxicity screening time. Unraveling the structure–activity relationship of potential hepatotoxins would help to classify their hepatotoxic effects. Therefore, in addition to the current regulatory hepatotoxicity testing strategies, development and regulatory approval of hepatotoxins need to be discussed in order to identify potential gaps in the safety assessment. The overall results of our study support the hypothesis that a battery of rapid, simple, and reliable assays is an excellent tool for predicting in vivo effects of suspected liver toxins. The human liver HepaRG cells do not appear to be an ideal in vitro liver model for this purpose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
145
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed original reviews and hypothesis-driven research articles on mechanistic, fundamental and applied research relating to the toxicity of drugs and chemicals at the molecular, cellular, tissue, target organ and whole body level in vivo (by all relevant routes of exposure) and in vitro / ex vivo. All aspects of toxicology are covered (including but not limited to nanotoxicology, genomics and proteomics, teratogenesis, carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, reproductive and endocrine toxicology, toxicopathology, target organ toxicity, systems toxicity (eg immunotoxicity), neurobehavioral toxicology, mechanistic studies, biochemical and molecular toxicology, novel biomarkers, pharmacokinetics/PBPK, risk assessment and environmental health studies) and emphasis is given to papers of clear application to human health, and/or advance mechanistic understanding and/or provide significant contributions and impact to their field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信