英语中的词义一致:它对噪音中的听者有帮助吗?

IF 0.9 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Marcel Schlechtweg
{"title":"英语中的词义一致:它对噪音中的听者有帮助吗?","authors":"Marcel Schlechtweg","doi":"10.1017/s1360674324000066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English morphosyntactic agreement, such as determiner–noun agreement in <jats:italic><jats:underline>These</jats:underline> cab<jats:underline>s</jats:underline> broke down</jats:italic> and noun–verb agreement in <jats:italic>The cab<jats:underline>s</jats:underline> <jats:underline>break</jats:underline> down</jats:italic>, has a few interesting properties that enable us to investigate whether agreement has a psycholinguistic function, that is, whether it helps the listener process linguistic information expressed by a speaker. The present project relies on these properties in a perception experiment, examines the two aforementioned types of English agreement, and aims at analyzing whether and how native English listeners benefit from agreement. The two types of agreement were contrasted with cases without any overtly agreeing elements (e.g. <jats:italic>The cabs broke down</jats:italic>). Native speakers of English with normal hearing heard short English sentences in quiet and in more or less intense white noise and were requested to indicate whether the second word of the sentence (e.g. <jats:italic>These cabs broke down</jats:italic>) was a singular or plural noun. Accuracy was entered as the response variable in the binomial logistic regression model. Results showed that overt determiner–noun agreement clearly increased response accuracy, while noun–verb agreement had at best marginal effects. The findings are interpreted against the background of functional aspects of linguistic structures in English, in the context of unfavorable listening conditions in particular.","PeriodicalId":45748,"journal":{"name":"English Language & Linguistics","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphosyntactic agreement in English: does it help the listener in noise?\",\"authors\":\"Marcel Schlechtweg\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1360674324000066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"English morphosyntactic agreement, such as determiner–noun agreement in <jats:italic><jats:underline>These</jats:underline> cab<jats:underline>s</jats:underline> broke down</jats:italic> and noun–verb agreement in <jats:italic>The cab<jats:underline>s</jats:underline> <jats:underline>break</jats:underline> down</jats:italic>, has a few interesting properties that enable us to investigate whether agreement has a psycholinguistic function, that is, whether it helps the listener process linguistic information expressed by a speaker. The present project relies on these properties in a perception experiment, examines the two aforementioned types of English agreement, and aims at analyzing whether and how native English listeners benefit from agreement. The two types of agreement were contrasted with cases without any overtly agreeing elements (e.g. <jats:italic>The cabs broke down</jats:italic>). Native speakers of English with normal hearing heard short English sentences in quiet and in more or less intense white noise and were requested to indicate whether the second word of the sentence (e.g. <jats:italic>These cabs broke down</jats:italic>) was a singular or plural noun. Accuracy was entered as the response variable in the binomial logistic regression model. Results showed that overt determiner–noun agreement clearly increased response accuracy, while noun–verb agreement had at best marginal effects. The findings are interpreted against the background of functional aspects of linguistic structures in English, in the context of unfavorable listening conditions in particular.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"English Language & Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"English Language & Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674324000066\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674324000066","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英语的语态句法一致,如 These cabs broke down 中的定语-名词一致和 The cabs break down 中的名词-动词一致,具有一些有趣的特性,使我们能够研究一致是否具有心理语言学功能,即是否有助于听者处理说话者所表达的语言信息。本项目在一项感知实验中利用了这些特性,研究了上述两种类型的英语连贯,旨在分析母语为英语的听者是否以及如何从连贯中受益。这两种类型的一致与没有任何明显一致元素的情况(如 The cabs broke down)形成对比。听力正常的英语母语者在安静和或强或弱的白噪声中听到英语短句,并被要求指出句子中的第二个词(如 These cabs broke down)是单数还是复数名词。在二项逻辑回归模型中,准确性被作为反应变量。结果表明,明显的定语-名词一致明显提高了回答的准确性,而名词-动词一致最多只有微不足道的影响。本研究以英语语言结构的功能方面为背景,特别是在不利的听力条件下对研究结果进行了解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Morphosyntactic agreement in English: does it help the listener in noise?
English morphosyntactic agreement, such as determiner–noun agreement in These cabs broke down and noun–verb agreement in The cabs break down, has a few interesting properties that enable us to investigate whether agreement has a psycholinguistic function, that is, whether it helps the listener process linguistic information expressed by a speaker. The present project relies on these properties in a perception experiment, examines the two aforementioned types of English agreement, and aims at analyzing whether and how native English listeners benefit from agreement. The two types of agreement were contrasted with cases without any overtly agreeing elements (e.g. The cabs broke down). Native speakers of English with normal hearing heard short English sentences in quiet and in more or less intense white noise and were requested to indicate whether the second word of the sentence (e.g. These cabs broke down) was a singular or plural noun. Accuracy was entered as the response variable in the binomial logistic regression model. Results showed that overt determiner–noun agreement clearly increased response accuracy, while noun–verb agreement had at best marginal effects. The findings are interpreted against the background of functional aspects of linguistic structures in English, in the context of unfavorable listening conditions in particular.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: English Language and Linguistics, published twice a year, is an international journal which focuses on the description of the English language within the framework of contemporary linguistics. The journal is concerned equally with the synchronic and the diachronic aspects of English language studies and publishes articles of the highest quality which make a substantial contribution to our understanding of the structure and development of the English language and which are informed by a knowledge and appreciation of linguistic theory. English Language and Linguistics carries articles and short discussion papers or squibs on all core aspects of English, from its beginnings to the present day, including syntax, morphology, phonology, semantics, pragmatics, corpus linguistics and lexis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信