低约束压力下粉末状岩石的速度测量以及与月球浅层地震速度的比较

IF 3.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
C. C. Amos, M. Prasad, K. M. Cannon, C. B. Dreyer
{"title":"低约束压力下粉末状岩石的速度测量以及与月球浅层地震速度的比较","authors":"C. C. Amos,&nbsp;M. Prasad,&nbsp;K. M. Cannon,&nbsp;C. B. Dreyer","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seismic methods will be useful for future lunar near-surface characterization, and high-fidelity elastic models will be required to aid interpretation of seismic observations. To develop an elastic lunar near-surface model, we performed ultrasonic velocity measurements of lunar regolith simulant at low confining pressure and developed a rock physics model calibrated to these measurements. Grain contact models based on Hertz-Mindlin theory produce accurate results at high confining pressure (i.e., several hundred meters or more burial depth) but historically fail to predict observed velocities in unconsolidated media at low pressure. Therefore, we heuristically modified existing models to fit our measured data over a range of porosities and confining pressures. To compare with Apollo 14 and 16 active seismic experiments, we used our new heuristic rock physics model to produce lunar subsurface velocity profiles. We performed ray tracing through our velocity profiles to calculate seismic traveltime, which results in good agreement with first arrivals interpreted from the Apollo experiments. Our model suggests a slightly higher velocity-pressure dependence than inferred from in situ measurements, which may be due to porosity reduction in the lunar regolith from impact-induced and natural vibrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008287","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Velocity Measurements of Powdered Rock at Low Confining Pressures and Comparison to Lunar Shallow Seismic Velocity\",\"authors\":\"C. C. Amos,&nbsp;M. Prasad,&nbsp;K. M. Cannon,&nbsp;C. B. Dreyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JE008287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Seismic methods will be useful for future lunar near-surface characterization, and high-fidelity elastic models will be required to aid interpretation of seismic observations. To develop an elastic lunar near-surface model, we performed ultrasonic velocity measurements of lunar regolith simulant at low confining pressure and developed a rock physics model calibrated to these measurements. Grain contact models based on Hertz-Mindlin theory produce accurate results at high confining pressure (i.e., several hundred meters or more burial depth) but historically fail to predict observed velocities in unconsolidated media at low pressure. Therefore, we heuristically modified existing models to fit our measured data over a range of porosities and confining pressures. To compare with Apollo 14 and 16 active seismic experiments, we used our new heuristic rock physics model to produce lunar subsurface velocity profiles. We performed ray tracing through our velocity profiles to calculate seismic traveltime, which results in good agreement with first arrivals interpreted from the Apollo experiments. Our model suggests a slightly higher velocity-pressure dependence than inferred from in situ measurements, which may be due to porosity reduction in the lunar regolith from impact-induced and natural vibrations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008287\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008287\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008287","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地震方法对未来的月球近地表特征描述非常有用,需要高保真的弹性模型来帮助解释地震观测结果。为了建立月球近地表弹性模型,我们在低约束压力下对月球碎屑岩模拟物进行了超声波速度测量,并根据这些测量结果建立了岩石物理模型。基于赫兹-明德林理论的晶粒接触模型在高约束压力(即几百米或更深的埋藏深度)下能产生精确的结果,但在低压下却无法预测未固结介质中的观测速度。因此,我们对现有模型进行了启发式修改,以适应在一系列孔隙度和封闭压力下的测量数据。为了与阿波罗 14 号和 16 号主动地震实验进行比较,我们使用新的启发式岩石物理模型制作了月球地下速度剖面图。我们通过速度剖面图进行射线追踪,计算地震旅行时间,结果与阿波罗实验解释的初至时间十分吻合。我们的模型表明,速度与压力的相关性略高于现场测量的推断,这可能是由于月球碎屑岩中的孔隙率因撞击引起的振动和自然振动而降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Velocity Measurements of Powdered Rock at Low Confining Pressures and Comparison to Lunar Shallow Seismic Velocity

Velocity Measurements of Powdered Rock at Low Confining Pressures and Comparison to Lunar Shallow Seismic Velocity

Seismic methods will be useful for future lunar near-surface characterization, and high-fidelity elastic models will be required to aid interpretation of seismic observations. To develop an elastic lunar near-surface model, we performed ultrasonic velocity measurements of lunar regolith simulant at low confining pressure and developed a rock physics model calibrated to these measurements. Grain contact models based on Hertz-Mindlin theory produce accurate results at high confining pressure (i.e., several hundred meters or more burial depth) but historically fail to predict observed velocities in unconsolidated media at low pressure. Therefore, we heuristically modified existing models to fit our measured data over a range of porosities and confining pressures. To compare with Apollo 14 and 16 active seismic experiments, we used our new heuristic rock physics model to produce lunar subsurface velocity profiles. We performed ray tracing through our velocity profiles to calculate seismic traveltime, which results in good agreement with first arrivals interpreted from the Apollo experiments. Our model suggests a slightly higher velocity-pressure dependence than inferred from in situ measurements, which may be due to porosity reduction in the lunar regolith from impact-induced and natural vibrations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets
Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
27.10%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信