量表开发研究:接受血液透析治疗的患者主要护理者负担量表

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Cansu Kosar Sahin, Hatice Ceylan, Canan Demir Barutcu
{"title":"量表开发研究:接受血液透析治疗的患者主要护理者负担量表","authors":"Cansu Kosar Sahin, Hatice Ceylan, Canan Demir Barutcu","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.14129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionAs hemodialysis is a long‐term treatment method requiring significant self‐management skills, it affects both the patient and the caregiver in many ways. It is inevitable that changes in the burden perceived by the caregiver over time will not affect the patient's health care outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop an up‐to‐date scale by examining the psychometric properties of items created specifically for the care burden perceived by individuals who provide care for patients receiving hemodialysis treatment.MethodsThis study is a methodological study with the use of the COSMIN Checklist. The sample of the study included 404 individuals who were the primary caregivers of patients receiving hemodialysis treatment. Data were collected using descriptive characteristics form and the draft form of the Primary Caregiver Burden Scale Individuals Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and predictive validity were used to evaluate validity. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient, item analysis, and test–retest method were employed to evaluate reliability.ResultsAccording to exploratory factor analysis, a scale structure with four subdimensions was determined, and goodness of fit was achieved using confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the final form of the scale consisting of 34 items was found to be 0.95 for the total scale, 0.93 for the self‐management support subscale, 0.91 for the psychological support subscale, 0.91 for the caregiver symptom subscale, and 0.93 for the caregiver individual coping subscale.ConclusionThe Primary Caregiver Burden Scale Individuals Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment, which was found to meet the validity and reliability criteria, has a four‐point Likert‐type scoring structure, 34 items, and four subdimensions. It is thought that the scale can make significant contributions to the international literature if its validity and reliability are established with nursing practices and research.","PeriodicalId":23021,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scale development study: Primary Caregiver Burden Scale Individuals Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment\",\"authors\":\"Cansu Kosar Sahin, Hatice Ceylan, Canan Demir Barutcu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1744-9987.14129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionAs hemodialysis is a long‐term treatment method requiring significant self‐management skills, it affects both the patient and the caregiver in many ways. It is inevitable that changes in the burden perceived by the caregiver over time will not affect the patient's health care outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop an up‐to‐date scale by examining the psychometric properties of items created specifically for the care burden perceived by individuals who provide care for patients receiving hemodialysis treatment.MethodsThis study is a methodological study with the use of the COSMIN Checklist. The sample of the study included 404 individuals who were the primary caregivers of patients receiving hemodialysis treatment. Data were collected using descriptive characteristics form and the draft form of the Primary Caregiver Burden Scale Individuals Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and predictive validity were used to evaluate validity. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient, item analysis, and test–retest method were employed to evaluate reliability.ResultsAccording to exploratory factor analysis, a scale structure with four subdimensions was determined, and goodness of fit was achieved using confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the final form of the scale consisting of 34 items was found to be 0.95 for the total scale, 0.93 for the self‐management support subscale, 0.91 for the psychological support subscale, 0.91 for the caregiver symptom subscale, and 0.93 for the caregiver individual coping subscale.ConclusionThe Primary Caregiver Burden Scale Individuals Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment, which was found to meet the validity and reliability criteria, has a four‐point Likert‐type scoring structure, 34 items, and four subdimensions. It is thought that the scale can make significant contributions to the international literature if its validity and reliability are established with nursing practices and research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14129\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:由于血液透析是一种需要大量自我管理技能的长期治疗方法,它对患者和护理人员都有多方面的影响。随着时间的推移,护理人员所感受到的负担的变化不可避免地不会影响患者的医疗结果。本研究的目的是通过检查专为血液透析患者提供护理的个人所感知的护理负担而创建的项目的心理测量特性,来开发一个最新的量表。研究样本包括 404 名接受血液透析治疗患者的主要护理人员。数据收集采用描述性特征表和接受血液透析治疗患者主要照顾者负担量表草案。采用探索性和确认性因素分析及预测有效性来评估其有效性。结果根据探索性因子分析,确定了包含四个子维度的量表结构,并通过确认性因子分析实现了拟合度。由 34 个项目组成的最终量表的 Cronbach's alpha 系数为:总量表 0.95,自我管理支持分量表 0.93,心理支持分量表 0.91,照顾者症状分量表 0.91,照顾者个体应对分量表 0.93。结论接受血液透析治疗的主要照顾者负担量表符合效度和信度标准,具有四点 Likert 式评分结构、34 个条目和 4 个子维度。如果该量表的效度和信度能与护理实践和研究相结合,相信会对国际文献做出重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scale development study: Primary Caregiver Burden Scale Individuals Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment
IntroductionAs hemodialysis is a long‐term treatment method requiring significant self‐management skills, it affects both the patient and the caregiver in many ways. It is inevitable that changes in the burden perceived by the caregiver over time will not affect the patient's health care outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop an up‐to‐date scale by examining the psychometric properties of items created specifically for the care burden perceived by individuals who provide care for patients receiving hemodialysis treatment.MethodsThis study is a methodological study with the use of the COSMIN Checklist. The sample of the study included 404 individuals who were the primary caregivers of patients receiving hemodialysis treatment. Data were collected using descriptive characteristics form and the draft form of the Primary Caregiver Burden Scale Individuals Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and predictive validity were used to evaluate validity. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient, item analysis, and test–retest method were employed to evaluate reliability.ResultsAccording to exploratory factor analysis, a scale structure with four subdimensions was determined, and goodness of fit was achieved using confirmatory factor analysis. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the final form of the scale consisting of 34 items was found to be 0.95 for the total scale, 0.93 for the self‐management support subscale, 0.91 for the psychological support subscale, 0.91 for the caregiver symptom subscale, and 0.93 for the caregiver individual coping subscale.ConclusionThe Primary Caregiver Burden Scale Individuals Receiving Hemodialysis Treatment, which was found to meet the validity and reliability criteria, has a four‐point Likert‐type scoring structure, 34 items, and four subdimensions. It is thought that the scale can make significant contributions to the international literature if its validity and reliability are established with nursing practices and research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis
Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
166
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis is the official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. The Journal publishes original articles, editorial comments, review articles, case reports, meeting abstracts and Communications information on apheresis and dialysis technologies and treatments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信