针灸与三环类抗抑郁药在紧张型头痛预防性治疗中的比较:间接治疗比较荟萃分析

Qing-Feng Tao, Yan-Bing Huang, Lu Yuan, Yun-Zhou Shi, Di Qin, Kun Ye, Wen-Yan Peng, Chao-Rong Xie, Hui Zheng
{"title":"针灸与三环类抗抑郁药在紧张型头痛预防性治疗中的比较:间接治疗比较荟萃分析","authors":"Qing-Feng Tao, Yan-Bing Huang, Lu Yuan, Yun-Zhou Shi, Di Qin, Kun Ye, Wen-Yan Peng, Chao-Rong Xie, Hui Zheng","doi":"10.1186/s10194-024-01776-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acupuncture showed better improvement than sham acupuncture in reducing attack frequency of tension-type headache (TTH), but its effectiveness relative to first-line drugs for TTH is unknown, which impedes the recommendation of acupuncture for patients who are intolerant to drugs for TTH. We aimed to estimate the relative effectiveness between acupuncture and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) through indirect treatment comparison (ITC) meta-analysis. We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from database inception until April 13, 2023. Randomized controlled trials of TCAs or acupuncture in the prevention of TTH in adults were included. The primary outcome was headache frequency. The secondary outcomes were headache intensity, responder rate, and adverse event rate. Bayesian random-effect models were used to perform ITC meta-analysis, and confidence of evidence was evaluated by using the GRADE approach. A total of 34 trials involving 4426 participants were included. Acupuncture had similar effect with TCAs in decreasing TTH frequency (amitriptyline: mean difference [MD] -1.29, 95% CI -5.28 to 3.02; amitriptylinoxide: MD -0.05, 95% CI -6.86 to 7.06) and reducing TTH intensity (amitriptyline: MD 2.35, 95% CI -1.20 to 5.78; clomipramine: MD 1.83, 95% CI -4.23 to 8.20). Amitriptyline had a higher rate of adverse events than acupuncture (OR 4.73, 95% CI 1.42 to 14.23). Acupuncture had similar effect as TCAs in reducing headache frequency of TTH, and acupuncture had a lower adverse events rate than amitriptyline, as shown by very low certainty of evidence. Acupuncture showed better improvement than sham acupuncture in reducing headache frequency of tension-type headache (TTH), but the lack of comparisons between acupuncture and first-line drugs impedes recommendation of acupuncture for TTH. Our indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis found similar effect between acupuncture and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in reducing TTH frequency with very low certainty of evidence. Similar effect between acupuncture and TCAs were also observed in reducing headache intensity with very low certainty of evidence. Acupuncture had a lower rate of adverse events than amitriptyline with very low certainty of evidence.","PeriodicalId":501630,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acupuncture versus tricyclic antidepressants in the prophylactic treatment of tension-type headaches: an indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Qing-Feng Tao, Yan-Bing Huang, Lu Yuan, Yun-Zhou Shi, Di Qin, Kun Ye, Wen-Yan Peng, Chao-Rong Xie, Hui Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10194-024-01776-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Acupuncture showed better improvement than sham acupuncture in reducing attack frequency of tension-type headache (TTH), but its effectiveness relative to first-line drugs for TTH is unknown, which impedes the recommendation of acupuncture for patients who are intolerant to drugs for TTH. We aimed to estimate the relative effectiveness between acupuncture and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) through indirect treatment comparison (ITC) meta-analysis. We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from database inception until April 13, 2023. Randomized controlled trials of TCAs or acupuncture in the prevention of TTH in adults were included. The primary outcome was headache frequency. The secondary outcomes were headache intensity, responder rate, and adverse event rate. Bayesian random-effect models were used to perform ITC meta-analysis, and confidence of evidence was evaluated by using the GRADE approach. A total of 34 trials involving 4426 participants were included. Acupuncture had similar effect with TCAs in decreasing TTH frequency (amitriptyline: mean difference [MD] -1.29, 95% CI -5.28 to 3.02; amitriptylinoxide: MD -0.05, 95% CI -6.86 to 7.06) and reducing TTH intensity (amitriptyline: MD 2.35, 95% CI -1.20 to 5.78; clomipramine: MD 1.83, 95% CI -4.23 to 8.20). Amitriptyline had a higher rate of adverse events than acupuncture (OR 4.73, 95% CI 1.42 to 14.23). Acupuncture had similar effect as TCAs in reducing headache frequency of TTH, and acupuncture had a lower adverse events rate than amitriptyline, as shown by very low certainty of evidence. Acupuncture showed better improvement than sham acupuncture in reducing headache frequency of tension-type headache (TTH), but the lack of comparisons between acupuncture and first-line drugs impedes recommendation of acupuncture for TTH. Our indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis found similar effect between acupuncture and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in reducing TTH frequency with very low certainty of evidence. Similar effect between acupuncture and TCAs were also observed in reducing headache intensity with very low certainty of evidence. Acupuncture had a lower rate of adverse events than amitriptyline with very low certainty of evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01776-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01776-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在减少紧张型头痛(TTH)发作频率方面,针灸比假针灸有更好的改善效果,但针灸相对于TTH一线药物的疗效尚不清楚,这妨碍了对TTH药物不耐受的患者推荐使用针灸治疗。我们旨在通过间接治疗比较(ITC)荟萃分析来估计针灸与三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)之间的相对疗效。我们检索了 Ovid Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆从数据库开始到 2023 年 4 月 13 日的数据。纳入了TCAs或针灸预防成人TTH的随机对照试验。主要结果是头痛频率。次要结果为头痛强度、应答率和不良事件发生率。采用贝叶斯随机效应模型进行ITC荟萃分析,并采用GRADE方法评估证据的可信度。共纳入了 34 项试验,涉及 4426 名参与者。在降低TTH频率方面,针灸与TCAs具有相似的效果(阿米替林:平均差[MD]-1.29,95% CI -5.28至3.02;阿米替林酰胺:MD -0.05,95% CI -3.02):MD -0.05,95% CI -6.86至7.06)和降低TTH强度(阿米替林:MD 2.35,95% CI -6.86至7.06):MD 2.35,95% CI -1.20 至 5.78;氯米帕明:MD 1.83,95% CI -4.23至8.20)。阿米替林的不良反应发生率高于针灸(OR 4.73,95% CI 1.42 至 14.23)。针灸在降低TTH头痛频率方面的效果与TCAs相似,针灸的不良反应率低于阿米替林,证据的确定性很低。在降低紧张型头痛(TTH)的头痛频率方面,针灸比假针灸有更好的改善效果,但针灸与一线药物之间缺乏比较,这阻碍了针灸治疗TTH的推荐。我们的间接治疗比较荟萃分析发现,针灸与三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)在降低TTH频率方面的效果相似,但证据的确定性很低。在降低头痛强度方面,针灸与三环类抗抑郁药的疗效相似,但证据的确定性很低。与阿米替林相比,针灸的不良反应发生率更低,但证据确定性很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acupuncture versus tricyclic antidepressants in the prophylactic treatment of tension-type headaches: an indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis
Acupuncture showed better improvement than sham acupuncture in reducing attack frequency of tension-type headache (TTH), but its effectiveness relative to first-line drugs for TTH is unknown, which impedes the recommendation of acupuncture for patients who are intolerant to drugs for TTH. We aimed to estimate the relative effectiveness between acupuncture and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) through indirect treatment comparison (ITC) meta-analysis. We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library from database inception until April 13, 2023. Randomized controlled trials of TCAs or acupuncture in the prevention of TTH in adults were included. The primary outcome was headache frequency. The secondary outcomes were headache intensity, responder rate, and adverse event rate. Bayesian random-effect models were used to perform ITC meta-analysis, and confidence of evidence was evaluated by using the GRADE approach. A total of 34 trials involving 4426 participants were included. Acupuncture had similar effect with TCAs in decreasing TTH frequency (amitriptyline: mean difference [MD] -1.29, 95% CI -5.28 to 3.02; amitriptylinoxide: MD -0.05, 95% CI -6.86 to 7.06) and reducing TTH intensity (amitriptyline: MD 2.35, 95% CI -1.20 to 5.78; clomipramine: MD 1.83, 95% CI -4.23 to 8.20). Amitriptyline had a higher rate of adverse events than acupuncture (OR 4.73, 95% CI 1.42 to 14.23). Acupuncture had similar effect as TCAs in reducing headache frequency of TTH, and acupuncture had a lower adverse events rate than amitriptyline, as shown by very low certainty of evidence. Acupuncture showed better improvement than sham acupuncture in reducing headache frequency of tension-type headache (TTH), but the lack of comparisons between acupuncture and first-line drugs impedes recommendation of acupuncture for TTH. Our indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis found similar effect between acupuncture and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in reducing TTH frequency with very low certainty of evidence. Similar effect between acupuncture and TCAs were also observed in reducing headache intensity with very low certainty of evidence. Acupuncture had a lower rate of adverse events than amitriptyline with very low certainty of evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信