免疫组化双重染色法分析非小细胞肺癌胸腔积液与匹配原发性肺癌组织中程序性死亡配体 1 表达的一致性

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Zihan Sun, Xiaoyue Xiao, Shuo Liang, Haiyue Ma, Yue Sun, Linlin Zhao, Cong Wang, Xinxiang Chang, Huan Zhao, Huiqin Guo, Zhihui Zhang
{"title":"免疫组化双重染色法分析非小细胞肺癌胸腔积液与匹配原发性肺癌组织中程序性死亡配体 1 表达的一致性","authors":"Zihan Sun,&nbsp;Xiaoyue Xiao,&nbsp;Shuo Liang,&nbsp;Haiyue Ma,&nbsp;Yue Sun,&nbsp;Linlin Zhao,&nbsp;Cong Wang,&nbsp;Xinxiang Chang,&nbsp;Huan Zhao,&nbsp;Huiqin Guo,&nbsp;Zhihui Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.labinv.2024.102058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In clinical practice, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) detection is prone to nonspecific staining due to the complex cellular composition of pleural effusion smears. In this study, diaminobenzidine (DAB) and 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC) immunohistochemistry double staining was performed to investigate PD-L1 expression in tumor cells from malignant pleural effusion (MPE). MPE was considered as a metastasis in non–small cell lung cancer patients; thus, the heterogeneity between metastatic and primary lung cancer was revealed as well. Ninety paired specimens of MPE cell blocks and matched primary lung cancer tissues from non–small cell lung cancer patients were subjected to PD-L1 and thyroid transcription factor-1(TTF-1)/p63 immunohistochemistry double staining. Two experienced pathologists independently evaluated PD-L1 expression using 3 cutoffs (1%, 10%, and 50%). PD-L1 expression in MPE was strongly correlated with that in matched primary lung cancer tissues (R = 0.813; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Using a 4-tier scale (cutoffs: 1%, 10%, and 50%), the concordance was 71.1% (Cohen’s κ = .534). Using a 2-tier scale, the concordance was 75.6% (1%, Cohen’s κ = 0.53), 78.9% (10%, Cohen’s κ = 0.574), and 95.6% (50%, Cohen’s κ = 0.754). The rates of PD-L1 positivity in MPE (56.7%) were higher than that in lung tissues (32.2%). All 27 discordant cases had higher scores in MPE. The double-staining method provided superior identification of PD-L1-positive tumor cells on a background with nonspecific staining. In conclusion, PD-L1 expression was moderately concordant between metastatic MPE cell blocks and matched primary lung carcinoma tissues, with variability related to tumor heterogeneity. MPE should be considered to detect PD-L1 when histological specimens are unattainable, especially when PD-L1 expression is &gt;50%. PD-L1 positivity rates were higher in MPE. Double staining can improve PD-L1 detection by reducing false-negative/positive results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17930,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Investigation","volume":"104 6","pages":"Article 102058"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency Analysis of Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Between Pleural Effusion and Matched Primary Lung Cancer Tissues by Immunohistochemical Double Staining\",\"authors\":\"Zihan Sun,&nbsp;Xiaoyue Xiao,&nbsp;Shuo Liang,&nbsp;Haiyue Ma,&nbsp;Yue Sun,&nbsp;Linlin Zhao,&nbsp;Cong Wang,&nbsp;Xinxiang Chang,&nbsp;Huan Zhao,&nbsp;Huiqin Guo,&nbsp;Zhihui Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.labinv.2024.102058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In clinical practice, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) detection is prone to nonspecific staining due to the complex cellular composition of pleural effusion smears. In this study, diaminobenzidine (DAB) and 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC) immunohistochemistry double staining was performed to investigate PD-L1 expression in tumor cells from malignant pleural effusion (MPE). MPE was considered as a metastasis in non–small cell lung cancer patients; thus, the heterogeneity between metastatic and primary lung cancer was revealed as well. Ninety paired specimens of MPE cell blocks and matched primary lung cancer tissues from non–small cell lung cancer patients were subjected to PD-L1 and thyroid transcription factor-1(TTF-1)/p63 immunohistochemistry double staining. Two experienced pathologists independently evaluated PD-L1 expression using 3 cutoffs (1%, 10%, and 50%). PD-L1 expression in MPE was strongly correlated with that in matched primary lung cancer tissues (R = 0.813; <em>P</em> &lt; .001). Using a 4-tier scale (cutoffs: 1%, 10%, and 50%), the concordance was 71.1% (Cohen’s κ = .534). Using a 2-tier scale, the concordance was 75.6% (1%, Cohen’s κ = 0.53), 78.9% (10%, Cohen’s κ = 0.574), and 95.6% (50%, Cohen’s κ = 0.754). The rates of PD-L1 positivity in MPE (56.7%) were higher than that in lung tissues (32.2%). All 27 discordant cases had higher scores in MPE. The double-staining method provided superior identification of PD-L1-positive tumor cells on a background with nonspecific staining. In conclusion, PD-L1 expression was moderately concordant between metastatic MPE cell blocks and matched primary lung carcinoma tissues, with variability related to tumor heterogeneity. MPE should be considered to detect PD-L1 when histological specimens are unattainable, especially when PD-L1 expression is &gt;50%. PD-L1 positivity rates were higher in MPE. Double staining can improve PD-L1 detection by reducing false-negative/positive results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory Investigation\",\"volume\":\"104 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 102058\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023683724017367\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023683724017367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在临床实践中,由于胸腔积液涂片的细胞成分复杂,程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)的检测容易出现非特异性染色。本研究采用 DAB 和 AEC 免疫组化双重染色法检测恶性胸腔积液(MPE)中肿瘤细胞的 PD-L1 表达。MPE被认为是非小细胞肺癌患者的转移灶,因此也揭示了转移性肺癌和原发性肺癌之间的异质性。对来自非小细胞肺癌患者的 90 份 MPE 细胞块标本和匹配的原发性肺癌组织进行了 PD-L1 和甲状腺转录因子-1(TTF-1)/p63 免疫组化双重染色。两名经验丰富的病理学家使用3个截断点(1%、10%和50%)独立评估PD-L1的表达。MPE 中的 PD-L1 表达与匹配的原发性肺癌组织中的 PD-L1 表达密切相关(R = 0.813; < .001)。采用 4 级标准(临界值:1%、10% 和 50%),一致性为 71.1%(Cohen's κ = .534)。采用 2 级评分法,吻合率分别为 75.6%(1%,Cohen's κ = 0.53)、78.9%(10%,Cohen's κ = 0.574)和 95.6%(50%,Cohen's κ = 0.754)。MPE 中的 PD-L1 阳性率(56.7%)高于肺组织中的 PD-L1 阳性率(32.2%)。所有 27 个不一致病例在 MPE 中的得分都较高。在非特异性染色的背景下,双重染色法能更好地识别 PD-L1 阳性的肿瘤细胞。总之,转移性MPE细胞块与匹配的原发性肺癌组织之间的PD-L1表达高度一致,其变异性与肿瘤异质性有关。当无法获得组织学标本时,尤其是当PD-L1表达>50%时,应考虑用MPE检测PD-L1。MPE 中的 PD-L1 阳性率更高。双重染色可减少假阴性/阳性结果,从而提高PD-L1的检测率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consistency Analysis of Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Between Pleural Effusion and Matched Primary Lung Cancer Tissues by Immunohistochemical Double Staining

In clinical practice, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) detection is prone to nonspecific staining due to the complex cellular composition of pleural effusion smears. In this study, diaminobenzidine (DAB) and 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC) immunohistochemistry double staining was performed to investigate PD-L1 expression in tumor cells from malignant pleural effusion (MPE). MPE was considered as a metastasis in non–small cell lung cancer patients; thus, the heterogeneity between metastatic and primary lung cancer was revealed as well. Ninety paired specimens of MPE cell blocks and matched primary lung cancer tissues from non–small cell lung cancer patients were subjected to PD-L1 and thyroid transcription factor-1(TTF-1)/p63 immunohistochemistry double staining. Two experienced pathologists independently evaluated PD-L1 expression using 3 cutoffs (1%, 10%, and 50%). PD-L1 expression in MPE was strongly correlated with that in matched primary lung cancer tissues (R = 0.813; P < .001). Using a 4-tier scale (cutoffs: 1%, 10%, and 50%), the concordance was 71.1% (Cohen’s κ = .534). Using a 2-tier scale, the concordance was 75.6% (1%, Cohen’s κ = 0.53), 78.9% (10%, Cohen’s κ = 0.574), and 95.6% (50%, Cohen’s κ = 0.754). The rates of PD-L1 positivity in MPE (56.7%) were higher than that in lung tissues (32.2%). All 27 discordant cases had higher scores in MPE. The double-staining method provided superior identification of PD-L1-positive tumor cells on a background with nonspecific staining. In conclusion, PD-L1 expression was moderately concordant between metastatic MPE cell blocks and matched primary lung carcinoma tissues, with variability related to tumor heterogeneity. MPE should be considered to detect PD-L1 when histological specimens are unattainable, especially when PD-L1 expression is >50%. PD-L1 positivity rates were higher in MPE. Double staining can improve PD-L1 detection by reducing false-negative/positive results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Laboratory Investigation
Laboratory Investigation 医学-病理学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
125
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Laboratory Investigation is an international journal owned by the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology. Laboratory Investigation offers prompt publication of high-quality original research in all biomedical disciplines relating to the understanding of human disease and the application of new methods to the diagnosis of disease. Both human and experimental studies are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信