经皮肌腱干针疗法和推力手法作为多模式物理疗法的辅助疗法,适用于肘外侧肌腱病变患者:多中心随机临床试验

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
James Dunning, Firas Mourad, Paul Bliton, Casey Charlebois, Patrick Gorby, Noah Zacharko, Brus Layson, Filippo Maselli, Ian Young, César Fernández-de-las-Peñas
{"title":"经皮肌腱干针疗法和推力手法作为多模式物理疗法的辅助疗法,适用于肘外侧肌腱病变患者:多中心随机临床试验","authors":"James Dunning, Firas Mourad, Paul Bliton, Casey Charlebois, Patrick Gorby, Noah Zacharko, Brus Layson, Filippo Maselli, Ian Young, César Fernández-de-las-Peñas","doi":"10.1177/02692155241249968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the effects of adding electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation into a multimodal program of exercise, mobilization, and ultrasound in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy.DesignRandomized, single-blinded, multicenter, parallel-group trial.SettingThirteen outpatient physical therapy clinics in nine different US states.ParticipantsOne hundred and forty-three participants (n = 143) with lateral elbow tendinopathy were randomized.InterventionCervical spine manipulation, extremity manipulation, and percutaneous tendon electrical dry needling plus multimodal physical therapy (n = 73) or multimodal physical therapy (n = 70) alone.Main measuresThe primary outcome was elbow pain intensity and disability as measured by the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3 months. Secondary outcomes included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Tennis Elbow Functional Scale, Global Rating of Change, and medication intake.ResultsThe 2 × 4 analysis of covariance demonstrated that individuals with lateral elbow tendinopathy receiving electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation plus multimodal physical therapy experienced significantly greater improvements in disability (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation: F = 19.675; P < 0.001), elbow pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale: F = 22.769; P < 0.001), and function (Tennis Elbow Function Scale: F = 13.269; P < 0.001) than those receiving multimodal physical therapy alone at 3 months. The between-group effect size was large for pain and disability (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation: standardized mean difference = 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.78, 1.48) in favor of the electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation group.ConclusionsThe inclusion of percutaneous tendon electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation into a multimodal program of exercise, mobilization and ultrasound was more effective than multimodal physical therapy alone in individuals with lateral elbow tendinopathy. Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03167710 May 30, 2017.","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous tendon dry needling and thrust manipulation as an adjunct to multimodal physical therapy in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy: A multicenter randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"James Dunning, Firas Mourad, Paul Bliton, Casey Charlebois, Patrick Gorby, Noah Zacharko, Brus Layson, Filippo Maselli, Ian Young, César Fernández-de-las-Peñas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155241249968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the effects of adding electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation into a multimodal program of exercise, mobilization, and ultrasound in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy.DesignRandomized, single-blinded, multicenter, parallel-group trial.SettingThirteen outpatient physical therapy clinics in nine different US states.ParticipantsOne hundred and forty-three participants (n = 143) with lateral elbow tendinopathy were randomized.InterventionCervical spine manipulation, extremity manipulation, and percutaneous tendon electrical dry needling plus multimodal physical therapy (n = 73) or multimodal physical therapy (n = 70) alone.Main measuresThe primary outcome was elbow pain intensity and disability as measured by the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3 months. Secondary outcomes included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Tennis Elbow Functional Scale, Global Rating of Change, and medication intake.ResultsThe 2 × 4 analysis of covariance demonstrated that individuals with lateral elbow tendinopathy receiving electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation plus multimodal physical therapy experienced significantly greater improvements in disability (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation: F = 19.675; P < 0.001), elbow pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale: F = 22.769; P < 0.001), and function (Tennis Elbow Function Scale: F = 13.269; P < 0.001) than those receiving multimodal physical therapy alone at 3 months. The between-group effect size was large for pain and disability (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation: standardized mean difference = 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.78, 1.48) in favor of the electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation group.ConclusionsThe inclusion of percutaneous tendon electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation into a multimodal program of exercise, mobilization and ultrasound was more effective than multimodal physical therapy alone in individuals with lateral elbow tendinopathy. Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03167710 May 30, 2017.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241249968\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241249968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在评估在锻炼、活动和超声波等多模式治疗方案中加入干针电疗和推力手法治疗肘外侧肌腱病患者的效果。干预措施颈椎手法治疗、四肢手法治疗、经皮肌腱电干针治疗加多模式理疗(n = 73)或单用多模式理疗(n = 70).主要测量指标主要结果为基线、1周、4周和3个月时的患者评分网球肘评估(Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation)显示的肘部疼痛强度和残疾程度。结果2 × 4协方差分析表明,肘外侧肌腱病患者在接受干针电疗和推力手法治疗以及多模式理疗后,其残疾程度有明显改善(患者评定的网球肘评估:F = 19.675; P <0.001)、肘部疼痛强度(数字疼痛评分量表:F = 22.769; P <0.001)和功能(网球肘功能量表:F = 13.269; P <0.001)在 3 个月时的改善程度明显高于单独接受多模式理疗的患者。结论对于肘外侧肌腱病变患者而言,将经皮肌腱干针电疗和推拿纳入锻炼、活动和超声波等多模式疗法中比单独接受多模式物理疗法更有效。试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03167710 2017年5月30日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percutaneous tendon dry needling and thrust manipulation as an adjunct to multimodal physical therapy in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy: A multicenter randomized clinical trial
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the effects of adding electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation into a multimodal program of exercise, mobilization, and ultrasound in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy.DesignRandomized, single-blinded, multicenter, parallel-group trial.SettingThirteen outpatient physical therapy clinics in nine different US states.ParticipantsOne hundred and forty-three participants (n = 143) with lateral elbow tendinopathy were randomized.InterventionCervical spine manipulation, extremity manipulation, and percutaneous tendon electrical dry needling plus multimodal physical therapy (n = 73) or multimodal physical therapy (n = 70) alone.Main measuresThe primary outcome was elbow pain intensity and disability as measured by the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3 months. Secondary outcomes included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Tennis Elbow Functional Scale, Global Rating of Change, and medication intake.ResultsThe 2 × 4 analysis of covariance demonstrated that individuals with lateral elbow tendinopathy receiving electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation plus multimodal physical therapy experienced significantly greater improvements in disability (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation: F = 19.675; P < 0.001), elbow pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale: F = 22.769; P < 0.001), and function (Tennis Elbow Function Scale: F = 13.269; P < 0.001) than those receiving multimodal physical therapy alone at 3 months. The between-group effect size was large for pain and disability (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation: standardized mean difference = 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.78, 1.48) in favor of the electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation group.ConclusionsThe inclusion of percutaneous tendon electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation into a multimodal program of exercise, mobilization and ultrasound was more effective than multimodal physical therapy alone in individuals with lateral elbow tendinopathy. Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03167710 May 30, 2017.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信