文学的析取:论承认计算机为作者的条件

IF 0.2 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE
ORBIS LITTERARUM Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1111/oli.12450
Hannes Bajohr
{"title":"文学的析取:论承认计算机为作者的条件","authors":"Hannes Bajohr","doi":"10.1111/oli.12450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking the deictic judgment that is the modernist gesture of declaring something to be art as a starting point, this essay suggests an analogous deixis as a necessary condition for literature. This deixis also can serve as the basis for discussing the expectations of computer‐generated texts. Against the idea that computers or AI systems need only produce sufficiently good output in order to be considered authors, the essay proposes an approach that takes the social recognition of the deictic act within a community of judgment as a precondition for authorship. As an alternative to the Turing test, which is based on the paradigm of deception (people are tricked into considering computer‐written text to be written by humans), the essay favors a version of Susan Leigh Star's “Durkheim test,” which is based on the paradigm of co‐sociality (people directly recognize computers as social actors). Only if the gesture of a machine declaring something to be art is recognized as a deictic judgment in the full sense can one plausibly speak of computer authorship.","PeriodicalId":42582,"journal":{"name":"ORBIS LITTERARUM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The deixis of literature: On the conditions for recognizing computers as authors\",\"authors\":\"Hannes Bajohr\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/oli.12450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Taking the deictic judgment that is the modernist gesture of declaring something to be art as a starting point, this essay suggests an analogous deixis as a necessary condition for literature. This deixis also can serve as the basis for discussing the expectations of computer‐generated texts. Against the idea that computers or AI systems need only produce sufficiently good output in order to be considered authors, the essay proposes an approach that takes the social recognition of the deictic act within a community of judgment as a precondition for authorship. As an alternative to the Turing test, which is based on the paradigm of deception (people are tricked into considering computer‐written text to be written by humans), the essay favors a version of Susan Leigh Star's “Durkheim test,” which is based on the paradigm of co‐sociality (people directly recognize computers as social actors). Only if the gesture of a machine declaring something to be art is recognized as a deictic judgment in the full sense can one plausibly speak of computer authorship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORBIS LITTERARUM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORBIS LITTERARUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/oli.12450\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORBIS LITTERARUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/oli.12450","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以现代主义宣布某物为艺术的deictic判断为出发点,提出了类似的deixis作为文学的必要条件。这种判断也可以作为讨论对计算机生成文本的期望的基础。有观点认为,计算机或人工智能系统只需产生足够好的输出结果就能被视为作者,而本文提出了一种方法,将社会对判断群体中的脱字行为的认可作为作者身份的先决条件。图灵测试的基础是欺骗范式(人们受骗上当,将电脑撰写的文本视为人类撰写的文本),作为图灵测试的替代方案,文章倾向于苏珊-利-斯塔(Susan Leigh Star)的 "杜克海姆测试",该测试的基础是共同社会性范式(人们直接承认电脑是社会行为者)。只有当机器宣布某件东西是艺术品的姿态被认为是完全意义上的契合性判断时,人们才能貌似有理地谈论计算机的作者身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The deixis of literature: On the conditions for recognizing computers as authors
Taking the deictic judgment that is the modernist gesture of declaring something to be art as a starting point, this essay suggests an analogous deixis as a necessary condition for literature. This deixis also can serve as the basis for discussing the expectations of computer‐generated texts. Against the idea that computers or AI systems need only produce sufficiently good output in order to be considered authors, the essay proposes an approach that takes the social recognition of the deictic act within a community of judgment as a precondition for authorship. As an alternative to the Turing test, which is based on the paradigm of deception (people are tricked into considering computer‐written text to be written by humans), the essay favors a version of Susan Leigh Star's “Durkheim test,” which is based on the paradigm of co‐sociality (people directly recognize computers as social actors). Only if the gesture of a machine declaring something to be art is recognized as a deictic judgment in the full sense can one plausibly speak of computer authorship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ORBIS LITTERARUM
ORBIS LITTERARUM LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Orbis Litterarum is an international journal devoted to the study of European, American and related literature. Orbis Litterarum publishes peer reviewed, original articles on matters of general and comparative literature, genre and period, as well as analyses of specific works bearing on issues of literary theory and literary history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信