辣椒基因型对黄螨和蓟马抗性的形态学基础

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Jenia Thakur, Manmeet Brar Bhullar, Salesh Kumar Jindal
{"title":"辣椒基因型对黄螨和蓟马抗性的形态学基础","authors":"Jenia Thakur, Manmeet Brar Bhullar, Salesh Kumar Jindal","doi":"10.1007/s12600-024-01164-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To investigate the morphological factors contributing to resistance to yellow mite, <i>Polyphagotarsonemus latus</i> and thrips, <i>Scirtothrips dorsalis</i> in chilli, an analysis was conducted on 15 chilli genotypes, examining various traitsviz. trichome density, length, and angle, along with leaf thickness, length, breadth, and area. Among the genotypes, SL-696 exhibited the highest trichome density (87.67/0.75mm<sup>2</sup>), while IS-267 displayed the lowest density (19/0.75mm<sup>2</sup>), and C-142 lacked trichomes altogether. In terms of trichome length, SR-4611 had the maximum (5.02 µm), contrasting with PUP-661, which had the minimum length (1.16 µm). PCH-757 featured the highest trichome angle (44.47°), while AC-105° showed the lowest angle. C-142 demonstrated the greatest leaf thickness (264.67 µm), whereas SL-466 exhibited the smallest thickness (79.60 µm). PUP-661 displayed the highest values for leaf length (9.10 cm), breadth (3.93 cm), and area (148.19 cm<sup>2</sup>), with PP-418 exhibiting the minimum values for length (3.87 cm), breadth (1.40 cm), and leaf area (44.03 cm<sup>2</sup>). Analyses of correlations between damage score/LCI and various morphological leaf traits indicated weak, negative, yet nonsignificant associations with trichome density, length, angle, and leaf thickness. Conversely, leaf area demonstrated a weak positive but nonsignificant correlation with the damage score.</p>","PeriodicalId":20220,"journal":{"name":"Phytoparasitica","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphological basis of resistance to yellow mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus and thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis in chilli genotypes\",\"authors\":\"Jenia Thakur, Manmeet Brar Bhullar, Salesh Kumar Jindal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12600-024-01164-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To investigate the morphological factors contributing to resistance to yellow mite, <i>Polyphagotarsonemus latus</i> and thrips, <i>Scirtothrips dorsalis</i> in chilli, an analysis was conducted on 15 chilli genotypes, examining various traitsviz. trichome density, length, and angle, along with leaf thickness, length, breadth, and area. Among the genotypes, SL-696 exhibited the highest trichome density (87.67/0.75mm<sup>2</sup>), while IS-267 displayed the lowest density (19/0.75mm<sup>2</sup>), and C-142 lacked trichomes altogether. In terms of trichome length, SR-4611 had the maximum (5.02 µm), contrasting with PUP-661, which had the minimum length (1.16 µm). PCH-757 featured the highest trichome angle (44.47°), while AC-105° showed the lowest angle. C-142 demonstrated the greatest leaf thickness (264.67 µm), whereas SL-466 exhibited the smallest thickness (79.60 µm). PUP-661 displayed the highest values for leaf length (9.10 cm), breadth (3.93 cm), and area (148.19 cm<sup>2</sup>), with PP-418 exhibiting the minimum values for length (3.87 cm), breadth (1.40 cm), and leaf area (44.03 cm<sup>2</sup>). Analyses of correlations between damage score/LCI and various morphological leaf traits indicated weak, negative, yet nonsignificant associations with trichome density, length, angle, and leaf thickness. Conversely, leaf area demonstrated a weak positive but nonsignificant correlation with the damage score.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phytoparasitica\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phytoparasitica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-024-01164-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytoparasitica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-024-01164-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了研究辣椒对黄螨和蓟马抗性的形态因素,对 15 个辣椒基因型进行了分析,考察了各种性状,即毛状体密度、长度和角度,以及叶片厚度、长度、宽度和面积。在这些基因型中,SL-696 的毛状体密度最高(87.67/0.75mm2),而 IS-267 的密度最低(19/0.75mm2),C-142 则完全没有毛状体。在毛状体长度方面,SR-4611 的毛状体长度最大(5.02 微米),而 PUP-661 的毛状体长度最小(1.16 微米)。PCH-757 的毛状体角度最大(44.47°),而 AC-105° 的毛状体角度最小。C-142 的叶片厚度最大(264.67 微米),而 SL-466 的叶片厚度最小(79.60 微米)。PUP-661 的叶长(9.10 厘米)、叶宽(3.93 厘米)和叶面积(148.19 平方厘米)值最高,而 PP-418 的叶长(3.87 厘米)、叶宽(1.40 厘米)和叶面积(44.03 平方厘米)值最小。对损害评分/LCI 与叶片各种形态特征之间的相关性分析表明,损害评分/LCI 与毛状体密度、长度、角度和叶片厚度的相关性较弱,呈负相关,但不显著。相反,叶片面积与损伤评分呈微弱的正相关,但不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Morphological basis of resistance to yellow mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus and thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis in chilli genotypes

Morphological basis of resistance to yellow mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus and thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis in chilli genotypes

To investigate the morphological factors contributing to resistance to yellow mite, Polyphagotarsonemus latus and thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis in chilli, an analysis was conducted on 15 chilli genotypes, examining various traitsviz. trichome density, length, and angle, along with leaf thickness, length, breadth, and area. Among the genotypes, SL-696 exhibited the highest trichome density (87.67/0.75mm2), while IS-267 displayed the lowest density (19/0.75mm2), and C-142 lacked trichomes altogether. In terms of trichome length, SR-4611 had the maximum (5.02 µm), contrasting with PUP-661, which had the minimum length (1.16 µm). PCH-757 featured the highest trichome angle (44.47°), while AC-105° showed the lowest angle. C-142 demonstrated the greatest leaf thickness (264.67 µm), whereas SL-466 exhibited the smallest thickness (79.60 µm). PUP-661 displayed the highest values for leaf length (9.10 cm), breadth (3.93 cm), and area (148.19 cm2), with PP-418 exhibiting the minimum values for length (3.87 cm), breadth (1.40 cm), and leaf area (44.03 cm2). Analyses of correlations between damage score/LCI and various morphological leaf traits indicated weak, negative, yet nonsignificant associations with trichome density, length, angle, and leaf thickness. Conversely, leaf area demonstrated a weak positive but nonsignificant correlation with the damage score.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phytoparasitica
Phytoparasitica 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Phytoparasitica is an international journal on Plant Protection, that publishes original research contributions on the biological, chemical and molecular aspects of Entomology, Plant Pathology, Virology, Nematology, and Weed Sciences, which strives to improve scientific knowledge and technology for IPM, in forest and agroecosystems. Phytoparasitica emphasizes new insights into plant disease and pest etiology, epidemiology, host-parasite/pest biochemistry and cell biology, ecology and population biology, host genetics and resistance, disease vector biology, plant stress and biotic disorders, postharvest pathology and mycotoxins. Research can cover aspects related to the nature of plant diseases, pests and weeds, the causal agents, their spread, the losses they cause, crop loss assessment, and novel tactics and approaches for their management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信