共同设计积极行为支持(PBS+PLUS)培训资源:一项关于有自闭症的患者、其近亲属和临床医生的经历的定性研究。

Jao-Yue J Carminati, Kristian Holth, Jennie L Ponsford, K. Gould
{"title":"共同设计积极行为支持(PBS+PLUS)培训资源:一项关于有自闭症的患者、其近亲属和临床医生的经历的定性研究。","authors":"Jao-Yue J Carminati, Kristian Holth, Jennie L Ponsford, K. Gould","doi":"10.1071/IB23060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Challenging behaviours are often a significant difficulty faced following acquired brain injury (ABI), for which PBS+PLUS (a Positive Behaviour Support framework) is an effective intervention. Clinicians report experiencing a range of barriers to supporting behaviour change for individuals with ABI and require tailored resources to support the implementation of PBS+PLUS. This study aimed to describe the process of co-designing a PBS+PLUS intervention guidebook and podcast series together with individuals with ABI, close-others, and clinicians, and qualitatively examine co-design experiences. Methods The Knowledge-To-Action Framework was followed to support the translation of PBS+PLUS into clinical practice. Participants with ABI (n  = 4), close-others (n  = 7), and clinicians (n  = 3) participated in focus groups contributing to the development of a PBS+PLUS intervention guidebook and podcast series. Following completion of the groups, qualitative interviews were conducted to understand participants' perspectives of the co-design experience. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Co-design processes are described, and participants provided practical suggestions for co-design and the dissemination of developed resources. Two core themes encapsulating four sub-themes were identified. Firstly, 'Esteeming Experiences ' described the person-driven approach of co-design whereby participants felt supported and connected with other contributors and facilitators through sharing their perspectives. Secondly, 'Empowerment ' reflected participants' increased confidence and skills in applying PBS+PLUS. Conclusions Overall, participants endorsed the therapeutic benefits of co-design engagement and high utility of PBS+PLUS resources. This study adds to the growing literature supporting the use of co-design methodology within clinical implementation, and is inclusive of individuals with ABI, close-others, and clinicians.","PeriodicalId":519488,"journal":{"name":"Brain impairment : a multidisciplinary journal of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment","volume":"98 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-designing positive behaviour support (PBS+PLUS) training resources: a qualitative study of people with ABI, close-others, and clinicians' experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Jao-Yue J Carminati, Kristian Holth, Jennie L Ponsford, K. Gould\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/IB23060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Challenging behaviours are often a significant difficulty faced following acquired brain injury (ABI), for which PBS+PLUS (a Positive Behaviour Support framework) is an effective intervention. Clinicians report experiencing a range of barriers to supporting behaviour change for individuals with ABI and require tailored resources to support the implementation of PBS+PLUS. This study aimed to describe the process of co-designing a PBS+PLUS intervention guidebook and podcast series together with individuals with ABI, close-others, and clinicians, and qualitatively examine co-design experiences. Methods The Knowledge-To-Action Framework was followed to support the translation of PBS+PLUS into clinical practice. Participants with ABI (n  = 4), close-others (n  = 7), and clinicians (n  = 3) participated in focus groups contributing to the development of a PBS+PLUS intervention guidebook and podcast series. Following completion of the groups, qualitative interviews were conducted to understand participants' perspectives of the co-design experience. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Co-design processes are described, and participants provided practical suggestions for co-design and the dissemination of developed resources. Two core themes encapsulating four sub-themes were identified. Firstly, 'Esteeming Experiences ' described the person-driven approach of co-design whereby participants felt supported and connected with other contributors and facilitators through sharing their perspectives. Secondly, 'Empowerment ' reflected participants' increased confidence and skills in applying PBS+PLUS. Conclusions Overall, participants endorsed the therapeutic benefits of co-design engagement and high utility of PBS+PLUS resources. This study adds to the growing literature supporting the use of co-design methodology within clinical implementation, and is inclusive of individuals with ABI, close-others, and clinicians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":519488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain impairment : a multidisciplinary journal of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain impairment : a multidisciplinary journal of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB23060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain impairment : a multidisciplinary journal of the Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/IB23060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 挑战性行为通常是后天性脑损伤(ABI)后面临的一个重大困难,PBS+PLUS(积极行为支持框架)是一种有效的干预措施。临床医生报告称,在支持获得性脑损伤患者改变行为时遇到了一系列障碍,因此需要量身定制的资源来支持 PBS+PLUS 的实施。本研究旨在描述与 ABI 患者、近亲属和临床医生共同设计 PBS+PLUS 干预指导手册和播客系列的过程,并对共同设计的经验进行定性研究。方法 遵循 "知识到行动 "框架,支持将 PBS+PLUS 转化为临床实践。患有 ABI 的参与者(4 人)、近亲属(7 人)和临床医生(3 人)参加了焦点小组,为 PBS+PLUS 干预指南和播客系列的开发做出了贡献。小组讨论结束后,我们进行了定性访谈,以了解参与者对共同设计经验的看法。访谈记录采用反思性主题分析法进行分析。结果 描述了共同设计过程,参与者为共同设计和传播开发的资源提供了实用建议。确定了包含四个次主题的两个核心主题。首先,"令人尊敬的经历 "描述了以人为本的共同设计方法,参与者通过分享自己的观点,感受到了与其他贡献者和促进者之间的支持和联系。其次,"赋权 "反映了参与者在应用 PBS+PLUS 时信心和技能的增强。结论 总体而言,参与者认可共同设计参与的治疗效果以及 PBS+PLUS 资源的高度实用性。这项研究为越来越多支持在临床实施中使用共同设计方法的文献增添了新的内容,并将患有 ABI 的个人、亲密的人和临床医生纳入其中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-designing positive behaviour support (PBS+PLUS) training resources: a qualitative study of people with ABI, close-others, and clinicians' experiences.
Background Challenging behaviours are often a significant difficulty faced following acquired brain injury (ABI), for which PBS+PLUS (a Positive Behaviour Support framework) is an effective intervention. Clinicians report experiencing a range of barriers to supporting behaviour change for individuals with ABI and require tailored resources to support the implementation of PBS+PLUS. This study aimed to describe the process of co-designing a PBS+PLUS intervention guidebook and podcast series together with individuals with ABI, close-others, and clinicians, and qualitatively examine co-design experiences. Methods The Knowledge-To-Action Framework was followed to support the translation of PBS+PLUS into clinical practice. Participants with ABI (n  = 4), close-others (n  = 7), and clinicians (n  = 3) participated in focus groups contributing to the development of a PBS+PLUS intervention guidebook and podcast series. Following completion of the groups, qualitative interviews were conducted to understand participants' perspectives of the co-design experience. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results Co-design processes are described, and participants provided practical suggestions for co-design and the dissemination of developed resources. Two core themes encapsulating four sub-themes were identified. Firstly, 'Esteeming Experiences ' described the person-driven approach of co-design whereby participants felt supported and connected with other contributors and facilitators through sharing their perspectives. Secondly, 'Empowerment ' reflected participants' increased confidence and skills in applying PBS+PLUS. Conclusions Overall, participants endorsed the therapeutic benefits of co-design engagement and high utility of PBS+PLUS resources. This study adds to the growing literature supporting the use of co-design methodology within clinical implementation, and is inclusive of individuals with ABI, close-others, and clinicians.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信