瀑布公共媒体

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Ruth Sessler Bernstein, Toni Aspin
{"title":"瀑布公共媒体","authors":"Ruth Sessler Bernstein, Toni Aspin","doi":"10.18666/jnel-2024-12386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case study focuses on Cascade Public Media (CPM), a nonprofit whose mission is to inspire a smarter world through public broadcasting, which chose to deliberately change their organizational and board culture to be more equitable and inclusive. In this case, students and practitioners will learn the importance of adopting diversity, equity, and inclusion to better serve their audience and improve board and organizational performance. CPM, using careful and deliberate actions, was able to address systemic injustices and inequities within their board of directors. Over a multi-year period, the CPM board was able to build an accountability-driven strategic framework that brought an equity lens to all aspects of governance. We introduce two theoretical frameworks—Institutional Theory (Powell & DiMaggio, 1991) and Inclusive Interactions Framework (Bernstein et al., 2022)—as a means of highlighting the imperative of adopting actionable practices designed to transform board culture, power dynamics, policies, and structures to generate impactful results. The case is designed for undergraduates, graduates, and DEI and governance practitioners.","PeriodicalId":43170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cascade Public Media\",\"authors\":\"Ruth Sessler Bernstein, Toni Aspin\",\"doi\":\"10.18666/jnel-2024-12386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This case study focuses on Cascade Public Media (CPM), a nonprofit whose mission is to inspire a smarter world through public broadcasting, which chose to deliberately change their organizational and board culture to be more equitable and inclusive. In this case, students and practitioners will learn the importance of adopting diversity, equity, and inclusion to better serve their audience and improve board and organizational performance. CPM, using careful and deliberate actions, was able to address systemic injustices and inequities within their board of directors. Over a multi-year period, the CPM board was able to build an accountability-driven strategic framework that brought an equity lens to all aspects of governance. We introduce two theoretical frameworks—Institutional Theory (Powell & DiMaggio, 1991) and Inclusive Interactions Framework (Bernstein et al., 2022)—as a means of highlighting the imperative of adopting actionable practices designed to transform board culture, power dynamics, policies, and structures to generate impactful results. The case is designed for undergraduates, graduates, and DEI and governance practitioners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18666/jnel-2024-12386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/jnel-2024-12386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本案例研究的重点是 Cascade Public Media (CPM),这是一家非营利组织,其使命是通过公共广播来激励人们建设一个更加智慧的世界。在这个案例中,学生和从业人员将了解到采用多元化、公平和包容的方式来更好地服务受众并提高董事会和组织绩效的重要性。CPM 通过谨慎而周密的行动,解决了董事会内部系统性的不公正和不平等问题。在多年的时间里,CPM 董事会建立了一个以问责制为导向的战略框架,将公平视角引入治理的方方面面。我们介绍了两个理论框架--制度理论(Powell & DiMaggio,1991 年)和包容性互动框架(Bernstein 等人,2022 年)--以此来强调采取可操作实践的必要性,这些实践旨在转变董事会文化、权力动态、政策和结构,从而产生有影响力的结果。本案例专为本科生、毕业生以及发展与创新(DEI)和治理实践者设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cascade Public Media
This case study focuses on Cascade Public Media (CPM), a nonprofit whose mission is to inspire a smarter world through public broadcasting, which chose to deliberately change their organizational and board culture to be more equitable and inclusive. In this case, students and practitioners will learn the importance of adopting diversity, equity, and inclusion to better serve their audience and improve board and organizational performance. CPM, using careful and deliberate actions, was able to address systemic injustices and inequities within their board of directors. Over a multi-year period, the CPM board was able to build an accountability-driven strategic framework that brought an equity lens to all aspects of governance. We introduce two theoretical frameworks—Institutional Theory (Powell & DiMaggio, 1991) and Inclusive Interactions Framework (Bernstein et al., 2022)—as a means of highlighting the imperative of adopting actionable practices designed to transform board culture, power dynamics, policies, and structures to generate impactful results. The case is designed for undergraduates, graduates, and DEI and governance practitioners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership
Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信