对模范少数神话的错误批判

Claire Kim
{"title":"对模范少数神话的错误批判","authors":"Claire Kim","doi":"10.1353/tae.2024.a925045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: I argue in this article that Asian Americanists' standard critique of the \"model minority myth\" does more harm than good and should therefore be abandoned. I show that the critique misses the forest for the trees, disavowing structural anti-Blackness and the differentiated positioning of Asian Americans and Black people that it produces, thereby misconceiving the stakes and function of model minority discourse. What I offer here, then, is a critique of the critique of model minority discourse—as well as suggestions for how to re-assess such discourse in relation to anti-Blackness.","PeriodicalId":176857,"journal":{"name":"Theory & Event","volume":"65 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Misbegotten Critique of the Model Minority Myth\",\"authors\":\"Claire Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tae.2024.a925045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: I argue in this article that Asian Americanists' standard critique of the \\\"model minority myth\\\" does more harm than good and should therefore be abandoned. I show that the critique misses the forest for the trees, disavowing structural anti-Blackness and the differentiated positioning of Asian Americans and Black people that it produces, thereby misconceiving the stakes and function of model minority discourse. What I offer here, then, is a critique of the critique of model minority discourse—as well as suggestions for how to re-assess such discourse in relation to anti-Blackness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory & Event\",\"volume\":\"65 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory & Event\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2024.a925045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory & Event","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2024.a925045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:我在本文中指出,亚裔美国人对 "模范少数族裔神话 "的标准批评弊大于利,因此应予以摒弃。我指出,这种批判只见树木不见森林,否定了结构性反黑人以及由此产生的对亚裔美国人和黑人的差异化定位,从而误解了模范少数群体话语的利害关系和功能。因此,我在此提出的是对模范少数群体话语批判的批判--以及如何重新评估此类话语与反黑人的关系的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Misbegotten Critique of the Model Minority Myth
Abstract: I argue in this article that Asian Americanists' standard critique of the "model minority myth" does more harm than good and should therefore be abandoned. I show that the critique misses the forest for the trees, disavowing structural anti-Blackness and the differentiated positioning of Asian Americans and Black people that it produces, thereby misconceiving the stakes and function of model minority discourse. What I offer here, then, is a critique of the critique of model minority discourse—as well as suggestions for how to re-assess such discourse in relation to anti-Blackness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信