成人心胸和主动脉择期手术后的早期康复质量:试点报告。

IF 1.1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Ayu Ishida, M. Ida, Yuki Kinugasa, Hitomi Nakatani, Kayo Uyama, M. Kawaguchi
{"title":"成人心胸和主动脉择期手术后的早期康复质量:试点报告。","authors":"Ayu Ishida, M. Ida, Yuki Kinugasa, Hitomi Nakatani, Kayo Uyama, M. Kawaguchi","doi":"10.4103/aca.aca_183_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nPatient-centered outcome measures should be evaluated postoperatively as the recovery after surgery varies between patients. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and trajectory of the quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) in patients undergoing cardiothoracic and aortic surgeries.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nThis retrospective study included adult patients who underwent elective cardiothoracic and aortic surgeries. The primary outcome was the QoR-15, with a minimal clinically important difference of 6.8, assessed on postoperative days (POD) 2, 4, and 7. The final analysis included patients with at least one valid outcome. Feasibility and reliability were assessed by the successful completion rate on each POD and using Cronbach's alpha of the QoR-15 on POD 4. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate the trajectory of the postoperative QoR-15 scores.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 36 eligible patients, 30 with a mean age of 70 years were included in the final analysis. The successful completion rates on POD 2, 4, and 7 were 72.7%, 87.8%, and 87.8%, respectively. The mean QoR-15 scores on POD 2, 4, and 7 were 89.9, 98.0, and 108.3, respectively. The QoR-15 scores on POD 2 and 4 were not statistically different (P = 0.06) but were clinically significant. The QoR-15 score on POD 7 was statically (P < 0.001) and clinically higher than the QoR-15 score on POD 2. Cronbach's alpha for the QoR-15 score measured on POD 4 was 0.85.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe QoR-15 is a feasible and valid measurement after elective cardiothoracic surgery, which increases significantly over time after surgery.","PeriodicalId":7997,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Quality of Recovery after Elective Cardiothoracic and Aortic Surgeries in Adult Patients: A Pilot Report.\",\"authors\":\"Ayu Ishida, M. Ida, Yuki Kinugasa, Hitomi Nakatani, Kayo Uyama, M. Kawaguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aca.aca_183_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nPatient-centered outcome measures should be evaluated postoperatively as the recovery after surgery varies between patients. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and trajectory of the quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) in patients undergoing cardiothoracic and aortic surgeries.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\nThis retrospective study included adult patients who underwent elective cardiothoracic and aortic surgeries. The primary outcome was the QoR-15, with a minimal clinically important difference of 6.8, assessed on postoperative days (POD) 2, 4, and 7. The final analysis included patients with at least one valid outcome. Feasibility and reliability were assessed by the successful completion rate on each POD and using Cronbach's alpha of the QoR-15 on POD 4. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate the trajectory of the postoperative QoR-15 scores.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOf the 36 eligible patients, 30 with a mean age of 70 years were included in the final analysis. The successful completion rates on POD 2, 4, and 7 were 72.7%, 87.8%, and 87.8%, respectively. The mean QoR-15 scores on POD 2, 4, and 7 were 89.9, 98.0, and 108.3, respectively. The QoR-15 scores on POD 2 and 4 were not statistically different (P = 0.06) but were clinically significant. The QoR-15 score on POD 7 was statically (P < 0.001) and clinically higher than the QoR-15 score on POD 2. Cronbach's alpha for the QoR-15 score measured on POD 4 was 0.85.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThe QoR-15 is a feasible and valid measurement after elective cardiothoracic surgery, which increases significantly over time after surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_183_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_183_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景由于不同患者的术后恢复情况各不相同,因此应该在术后对以患者为中心的结果测量进行评估。我们旨在评估心胸手术和主动脉手术患者术后恢复质量-15(QoR-15)的可行性、可靠性和轨迹。主要结果是 QoR-15,最小临床重要差异为 6.8,在术后第 2、4 和 7 天进行评估。最终分析包括至少一项有效结果的患者。可行性和可靠性通过每个 POD 的成功完成率和 POD 4 的 QoR-15 的 Cronbach's alpha 进行评估。采用线性混合模型评估术后 QoR-15 评分的变化轨迹。结果 在 36 位符合条件的患者中,有 30 位患者(平均年龄 70 岁)被纳入最终分析。POD 2、4 和 7 的成功完成率分别为 72.7%、87.8% 和 87.8%。POD 2、4 和 7 的 QoR-15 平均得分分别为 89.9、98.0 和 108.3。POD 2 和 4 的 QoR-15 分数没有统计学差异(P = 0.06),但具有临床意义。POD 7 的 QoR-15 评分在统计学上(P < 0.001)和临床上都高于 POD 2 的 QoR-15 评分。结论 QoR-15 是一种可行且有效的测量方法,可在择期心胸手术后进行测量,且随着手术时间的推移,QoR-15 会显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Quality of Recovery after Elective Cardiothoracic and Aortic Surgeries in Adult Patients: A Pilot Report.
BACKGROUND Patient-centered outcome measures should be evaluated postoperatively as the recovery after surgery varies between patients. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, reliability, and trajectory of the quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) in patients undergoing cardiothoracic and aortic surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included adult patients who underwent elective cardiothoracic and aortic surgeries. The primary outcome was the QoR-15, with a minimal clinically important difference of 6.8, assessed on postoperative days (POD) 2, 4, and 7. The final analysis included patients with at least one valid outcome. Feasibility and reliability were assessed by the successful completion rate on each POD and using Cronbach's alpha of the QoR-15 on POD 4. A linear mixed model was used to evaluate the trajectory of the postoperative QoR-15 scores. RESULTS Of the 36 eligible patients, 30 with a mean age of 70 years were included in the final analysis. The successful completion rates on POD 2, 4, and 7 were 72.7%, 87.8%, and 87.8%, respectively. The mean QoR-15 scores on POD 2, 4, and 7 were 89.9, 98.0, and 108.3, respectively. The QoR-15 scores on POD 2 and 4 were not statistically different (P = 0.06) but were clinically significant. The QoR-15 score on POD 7 was statically (P < 0.001) and clinically higher than the QoR-15 score on POD 2. Cronbach's alpha for the QoR-15 score measured on POD 4 was 0.85. CONCLUSION The QoR-15 is a feasible and valid measurement after elective cardiothoracic surgery, which increases significantly over time after surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
147
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia (ACA) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesiologists. The journal is indexed with PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, IndMed and MedInd. The journal’s full text is online at www.annals.in. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in ACA. Authors do not have to pay for submission, processing or publication of articles in ACA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信