过去寄生虫的幽灵影响黑腹果蝇当前的非消耗性效应

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
{"title":"过去寄生虫的幽灵影响黑腹果蝇当前的非消耗性效应","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpara.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Parasites can indirectly impact hosts through non-consumptive effects (NCEs) via changes in behaviour, morphology, and/or physiology. These responses can be understood in terms of the ecology of fear (ectoparasites) or the ecology of disgust (endoparasites) framework. We tested the hypothesis that NCEs of parasite exposure (e.g., parasite avoidance and defense) trade off with other important behaviours such as feeding and resting. We predicted that when exposed to parasites (without infection), hosts will increase their defensive behaviors at the expense of feeding. We also posited that history of exposure (without infection), or previous infection would impact the expression of these NCEs. The study system involves a cactophilic fruit fly (<em>Drosophila nigrospiracula</em>) and a naturally occurring parasitic mite (<em>Macrocheles subbadius</em>). First, we assessed how prior mite exposure affected fly behaviour in response to current parasite exposure. Mite presence resulted in increased grooming and movement, but exposure history did not affect these behaviours. However, the interaction between previous and current exposure influenced host feeding and resting behaviours. We found that previously exposed flies increased feeding and decreased resting upon a secondary mite exposure. In a second experiment, we tested the role of infection history on current parasite exposure. Compared with naïve flies, previously infected flies were expected to increase defensive behaviours upon secondary exposure. Flies increased defensive and ambulatory behaviour in the presence of mites, and consequently less time was spent resting but feeding was unaffected. None of the behaviours measured were affected by previous infection status. In general, current parasite exposure resulted in NCEs. Moreover, our results showed that previous exposure (without infection) to parasites may have an even stronger effect upon secondary exposure than infection history. Our study highlights the importance of the ecology of fear and the role that exposure and infection history plays in generating NCEs of parasitism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13725,"journal":{"name":"International journal for parasitology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002075192400078X/pdfft?md5=071607e5ac2bf5976c8f7eeb0ce9c541&pid=1-s2.0-S002075192400078X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ghosts of parasites past influence current non-consumptive effects in Drosophila nigrospiracula\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijpara.2024.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Parasites can indirectly impact hosts through non-consumptive effects (NCEs) via changes in behaviour, morphology, and/or physiology. These responses can be understood in terms of the ecology of fear (ectoparasites) or the ecology of disgust (endoparasites) framework. We tested the hypothesis that NCEs of parasite exposure (e.g., parasite avoidance and defense) trade off with other important behaviours such as feeding and resting. We predicted that when exposed to parasites (without infection), hosts will increase their defensive behaviors at the expense of feeding. We also posited that history of exposure (without infection), or previous infection would impact the expression of these NCEs. The study system involves a cactophilic fruit fly (<em>Drosophila nigrospiracula</em>) and a naturally occurring parasitic mite (<em>Macrocheles subbadius</em>). First, we assessed how prior mite exposure affected fly behaviour in response to current parasite exposure. Mite presence resulted in increased grooming and movement, but exposure history did not affect these behaviours. However, the interaction between previous and current exposure influenced host feeding and resting behaviours. We found that previously exposed flies increased feeding and decreased resting upon a secondary mite exposure. In a second experiment, we tested the role of infection history on current parasite exposure. Compared with naïve flies, previously infected flies were expected to increase defensive behaviours upon secondary exposure. Flies increased defensive and ambulatory behaviour in the presence of mites, and consequently less time was spent resting but feeding was unaffected. None of the behaviours measured were affected by previous infection status. In general, current parasite exposure resulted in NCEs. Moreover, our results showed that previous exposure (without infection) to parasites may have an even stronger effect upon secondary exposure than infection history. Our study highlights the importance of the ecology of fear and the role that exposure and infection history plays in generating NCEs of parasitism.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal for parasitology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002075192400078X/pdfft?md5=071607e5ac2bf5976c8f7eeb0ce9c541&pid=1-s2.0-S002075192400078X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal for parasitology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002075192400078X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002075192400078X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

寄生虫可通过行为、形态和/或生理变化对宿主产生非消费性影响(NCE),从而间接影响宿主。这些反应可以从恐惧生态学(外寄生虫)或厌恶生态学(内寄生虫)的框架来理解。我们测试了一个假设,即暴露于寄生虫环境中的NCE(如躲避寄生虫和防御寄生虫)会与其他重要行为(如进食和休息)发生交换。我们预测,当暴露于寄生虫(未感染)时,宿主会增加防御行为而牺牲进食。我们还假设,接触寄生虫的历史(未感染)或之前的感染会影响这些 NCEs 的表达。研究系统涉及一种嗜仙人掌果蝇(Drosophila nigrospiracula)和一种自然发生的寄生螨(Macrocheles subbadius)。首先,我们评估了先前的螨虫接触如何影响苍蝇对当前寄生虫接触的行为反应。螨虫的存在增加了苍蝇的梳理和运动,但接触史并不影响这些行为。然而,先前和当前暴露之间的相互作用影响了宿主的摄食和休息行为。我们发现,之前接触过螨虫的苍蝇在第二次接触螨虫时会增加摄食,减少休息。在第二个实验中,我们测试了感染史对当前寄生虫暴露的影响。与天真苍蝇相比,之前感染过寄生虫的苍蝇在二次接触寄生虫时会增加防御行为。在有螨虫存在的情况下,苍蝇会增加防御和活动行为,因此休息时间减少,但进食不受影响。所测量的行为均不受先前感染状况的影响。总的来说,当前的寄生虫暴露会导致无行为能力。此外,我们的研究结果表明,以前接触寄生虫(未感染)对二次接触的影响可能比感染史更大。我们的研究凸显了恐惧生态学的重要性,以及暴露和感染史在产生寄生虫非传染性行为中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ghosts of parasites past influence current non-consumptive effects in Drosophila nigrospiracula

Ghosts of parasites past influence current non-consumptive effects in Drosophila nigrospiracula

Ghosts of parasites past influence current non-consumptive effects in Drosophila nigrospiracula

Parasites can indirectly impact hosts through non-consumptive effects (NCEs) via changes in behaviour, morphology, and/or physiology. These responses can be understood in terms of the ecology of fear (ectoparasites) or the ecology of disgust (endoparasites) framework. We tested the hypothesis that NCEs of parasite exposure (e.g., parasite avoidance and defense) trade off with other important behaviours such as feeding and resting. We predicted that when exposed to parasites (without infection), hosts will increase their defensive behaviors at the expense of feeding. We also posited that history of exposure (without infection), or previous infection would impact the expression of these NCEs. The study system involves a cactophilic fruit fly (Drosophila nigrospiracula) and a naturally occurring parasitic mite (Macrocheles subbadius). First, we assessed how prior mite exposure affected fly behaviour in response to current parasite exposure. Mite presence resulted in increased grooming and movement, but exposure history did not affect these behaviours. However, the interaction between previous and current exposure influenced host feeding and resting behaviours. We found that previously exposed flies increased feeding and decreased resting upon a secondary mite exposure. In a second experiment, we tested the role of infection history on current parasite exposure. Compared with naïve flies, previously infected flies were expected to increase defensive behaviours upon secondary exposure. Flies increased defensive and ambulatory behaviour in the presence of mites, and consequently less time was spent resting but feeding was unaffected. None of the behaviours measured were affected by previous infection status. In general, current parasite exposure resulted in NCEs. Moreover, our results showed that previous exposure (without infection) to parasites may have an even stronger effect upon secondary exposure than infection history. Our study highlights the importance of the ecology of fear and the role that exposure and infection history plays in generating NCEs of parasitism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: International Journal for Parasitology offers authors the option to sponsor nonsubscriber access to their articles on Elsevier electronic publishing platforms. For more information please view our Sponsored Articles page. The International Journal for Parasitology publishes the results of original research in all aspects of basic and applied parasitology, including all the fields covered by its Specialist Editors, and ranging from parasites and host-parasite relationships of intrinsic biological interest to those of social and economic importance in human and veterinary medicine and agriculture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信