{"title":"重症监护中的非医疗处方:混合方法研究。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Little is known about non-medical prescribers in critical care in the United Kingdom. In 2007, a small survey identified few non-medical prescribers; however, in the intervening years, there have been many changes to the Medicine Act 1968. It is likely that prescribing within the non-medical workforce in critical care has changed significantly.</p></div><div><h3>Aim/s</h3><p>This survey aimed to explore the breadth and diversity of prescribing practices of non-medical prescribers working within the wider critical care environment in the United Kingdom.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Data were collected via an online questionnaire adapted from the 2007 version and distributed by the BACCN to their members between 26th October 2021 and 19th November 2021. Freedom of Information requests were made to the Nursing and Midwifery<span> Council, The Health and Care Professions Council and the General Pharmaceutical Council to understand the number of non-medical prescribers.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The survey elicited 259 responses; 105 respondents identified themselves as non-medical prescribers, and 57 used Patient Group Directions only. In the ICU/HDU, 75 respondents identified as non-medical prescribers, with an additional 45 using Patient Group Directions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Since the last survey, there has been a large increase in the number and representation across all professional groups identifying as a non-medical prescriber and/or utilising patient group directions across critical care. Many staff responded to this survey who were neither NMPs nor utilising PGDs; of these, a large proportion were interested in taking on this additional responsibility.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Many people working within critical care are interested in becoming non-medical prescribers.</p><p>Assists with understanding characteristics of those working as non-medical prescribers within critical care.</p><p>Shows variations in practice in respect to PGDs, authorising of blood products and prescribing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-medical prescribing in critical care: A mixed methods study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Little is known about non-medical prescribers in critical care in the United Kingdom. In 2007, a small survey identified few non-medical prescribers; however, in the intervening years, there have been many changes to the Medicine Act 1968. It is likely that prescribing within the non-medical workforce in critical care has changed significantly.</p></div><div><h3>Aim/s</h3><p>This survey aimed to explore the breadth and diversity of prescribing practices of non-medical prescribers working within the wider critical care environment in the United Kingdom.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Data were collected via an online questionnaire adapted from the 2007 version and distributed by the BACCN to their members between 26th October 2021 and 19th November 2021. Freedom of Information requests were made to the Nursing and Midwifery<span> Council, The Health and Care Professions Council and the General Pharmaceutical Council to understand the number of non-medical prescribers.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The survey elicited 259 responses; 105 respondents identified themselves as non-medical prescribers, and 57 used Patient Group Directions only. In the ICU/HDU, 75 respondents identified as non-medical prescribers, with an additional 45 using Patient Group Directions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Since the last survey, there has been a large increase in the number and representation across all professional groups identifying as a non-medical prescriber and/or utilising patient group directions across critical care. Many staff responded to this survey who were neither NMPs nor utilising PGDs; of these, a large proportion were interested in taking on this additional responsibility.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><p>Many people working within critical care are interested in becoming non-medical prescribers.</p><p>Assists with understanding characteristics of those working as non-medical prescribers within critical care.</p><p>Shows variations in practice in respect to PGDs, authorising of blood products and prescribing.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724000892\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339724000892","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Non-medical prescribing in critical care: A mixed methods study
Background
Little is known about non-medical prescribers in critical care in the United Kingdom. In 2007, a small survey identified few non-medical prescribers; however, in the intervening years, there have been many changes to the Medicine Act 1968. It is likely that prescribing within the non-medical workforce in critical care has changed significantly.
Aim/s
This survey aimed to explore the breadth and diversity of prescribing practices of non-medical prescribers working within the wider critical care environment in the United Kingdom.
Method
Data were collected via an online questionnaire adapted from the 2007 version and distributed by the BACCN to their members between 26th October 2021 and 19th November 2021. Freedom of Information requests were made to the Nursing and Midwifery Council, The Health and Care Professions Council and the General Pharmaceutical Council to understand the number of non-medical prescribers.
Results
The survey elicited 259 responses; 105 respondents identified themselves as non-medical prescribers, and 57 used Patient Group Directions only. In the ICU/HDU, 75 respondents identified as non-medical prescribers, with an additional 45 using Patient Group Directions.
Conclusion
Since the last survey, there has been a large increase in the number and representation across all professional groups identifying as a non-medical prescriber and/or utilising patient group directions across critical care. Many staff responded to this survey who were neither NMPs nor utilising PGDs; of these, a large proportion were interested in taking on this additional responsibility.
Implications for practice
Many people working within critical care are interested in becoming non-medical prescribers.
Assists with understanding characteristics of those working as non-medical prescribers within critical care.
Shows variations in practice in respect to PGDs, authorising of blood products and prescribing.
期刊介绍:
The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.