不同制备设计对可压陶瓷边缘适应性的影响(体外研究)

Mohammed Deeb, Enas Abdelhalim, Hanaa Rabeae
{"title":"不同制备设计对可压陶瓷边缘适应性的影响(体外研究)","authors":"Mohammed Deeb, Enas Abdelhalim, Hanaa Rabeae","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.267953.2929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of various preparation designs on marginal adaption of pressable ceramic crowns. Materials and Methods: Forty freshly extracted maxillary premolars were used. Premolars were prepared to receive crowns with two marginal designs. The samples were divided randomly into two equal groups based on the tested ceramic materials (n=20); Group E for IPS e-max press and Group C for Celtra press. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups according to the tested finish line (n = 10); Subgroups (EF) and (ES) representing deep chamfer and chisel finish line of E-max samples, respectively. Subgroups (CF) and (CS) representing deep chamfer and chisel finish line of Celtra samples, respectively. Using a stereomicroscope, each sample’s marginal gap was assessed microscopically before cementation. After Cementation, specimens were subjected to thermocycling to mimic intraoral conditions and then marginal gap was assessed microscopically. Results: Subgroup (ES) recorded the highest marginal gap mean (62.96±6.48) and subgroup (CF) recorded the lowest one (51.9±4.95). Gp (E) recoded higher marginal gap mean value (63.23± 5.38 µm) than Gp (C) (57.42± 5.07 µm). The chisel margin subgroup recoded a statistically significant higher marginal gap mean value (62.65± 5.7 µm) than the chamfer margin subgroup (57.99± 4.75 µm). Conclusion: Celtra press group (C) showed better marginal adaptation compared to IPS e-max press group (E) before/after cementation. Deep chamfer subgroups (EF) & (CF) showed better marginal adaptation compared to chisel finish line subgroups (ES) & (CS). The results were within the clinically accepted range (120 µm).","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":"28 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Different Preparation Designs on Marginal Adaptation of Pressable Ceramics (An In-vitro Study)\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Deeb, Enas Abdelhalim, Hanaa Rabeae\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/edj.2024.267953.2929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of various preparation designs on marginal adaption of pressable ceramic crowns. Materials and Methods: Forty freshly extracted maxillary premolars were used. Premolars were prepared to receive crowns with two marginal designs. The samples were divided randomly into two equal groups based on the tested ceramic materials (n=20); Group E for IPS e-max press and Group C for Celtra press. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups according to the tested finish line (n = 10); Subgroups (EF) and (ES) representing deep chamfer and chisel finish line of E-max samples, respectively. Subgroups (CF) and (CS) representing deep chamfer and chisel finish line of Celtra samples, respectively. Using a stereomicroscope, each sample’s marginal gap was assessed microscopically before cementation. After Cementation, specimens were subjected to thermocycling to mimic intraoral conditions and then marginal gap was assessed microscopically. Results: Subgroup (ES) recorded the highest marginal gap mean (62.96±6.48) and subgroup (CF) recorded the lowest one (51.9±4.95). Gp (E) recoded higher marginal gap mean value (63.23± 5.38 µm) than Gp (C) (57.42± 5.07 µm). The chisel margin subgroup recoded a statistically significant higher marginal gap mean value (62.65± 5.7 µm) than the chamfer margin subgroup (57.99± 4.75 µm). Conclusion: Celtra press group (C) showed better marginal adaptation compared to IPS e-max press group (E) before/after cementation. Deep chamfer subgroups (EF) & (CF) showed better marginal adaptation compared to chisel finish line subgroups (ES) & (CS). The results were within the clinically accepted range (120 µm).\",\"PeriodicalId\":11504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.267953.2929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.267953.2929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估各种预备设计对可压陶瓷冠边缘适应性的影响。材料和方法:使用 40 颗新鲜拔出的上颌前磨牙。前磨牙准备接受两种边缘设计的牙冠。根据测试的陶瓷材料(n=20),将样本随机分为两个相同的组:E 组为 IPS e-max 压模,C 组为 Celtra 压模。每组又根据测试的完成线细分为两个子组(n = 10);子组(EF)和(ES)分别代表 E-max 样品的深倒角和凿形完成线。子组(CF)和(CS)分别代表 Celtra 样品的深倒角和凿形完成线。在胶结之前,使用体视显微镜对每个试样的边缘间隙进行显微评估。粘结后,对样本进行热循环以模拟口内条件,然后对边缘间隙进行显微评估。结果亚组(ES)的边缘间隙平均值最高(62.96±6.48),亚组(CF)的边缘间隙平均值最低(51.9±4.95)。Gp(E)记录的边缘间隙平均值(63.23± 5.38 µm)高于Gp(C)(57.42± 5.07 µm)。在统计学上,凿形边缘亚组的边缘间隙平均值(62.65± 5.7 µm)高于倒角边缘亚组(57.99± 4.75 µm)。结论与IPS e-max加压组(E)相比,Celtra加压组(C)在粘结前后表现出更好的边缘适应性。深倒角亚组(EF)和(CF)与凿端线亚组(ES)和(CS)相比,显示出更好的边缘适应性。结果均在临床认可的范围内(120 微米)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Different Preparation Designs on Marginal Adaptation of Pressable Ceramics (An In-vitro Study)
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of various preparation designs on marginal adaption of pressable ceramic crowns. Materials and Methods: Forty freshly extracted maxillary premolars were used. Premolars were prepared to receive crowns with two marginal designs. The samples were divided randomly into two equal groups based on the tested ceramic materials (n=20); Group E for IPS e-max press and Group C for Celtra press. Each group was subdivided into two subgroups according to the tested finish line (n = 10); Subgroups (EF) and (ES) representing deep chamfer and chisel finish line of E-max samples, respectively. Subgroups (CF) and (CS) representing deep chamfer and chisel finish line of Celtra samples, respectively. Using a stereomicroscope, each sample’s marginal gap was assessed microscopically before cementation. After Cementation, specimens were subjected to thermocycling to mimic intraoral conditions and then marginal gap was assessed microscopically. Results: Subgroup (ES) recorded the highest marginal gap mean (62.96±6.48) and subgroup (CF) recorded the lowest one (51.9±4.95). Gp (E) recoded higher marginal gap mean value (63.23± 5.38 µm) than Gp (C) (57.42± 5.07 µm). The chisel margin subgroup recoded a statistically significant higher marginal gap mean value (62.65± 5.7 µm) than the chamfer margin subgroup (57.99± 4.75 µm). Conclusion: Celtra press group (C) showed better marginal adaptation compared to IPS e-max press group (E) before/after cementation. Deep chamfer subgroups (EF) & (CF) showed better marginal adaptation compared to chisel finish line subgroups (ES) & (CS). The results were within the clinically accepted range (120 µm).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信