儿科护理紧急行为健康评估工具的开发与实施。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ryan O’Donnell MSN, RN, NEA-BC, Katherine A. Hinderer PhD, RN, CNE, NEA-BC, Daniel Belanger BSN, RN, Danielle Chenard MPH, Erin Boyle BSN, RN, Kevin Borrup DrPH, JD, MPA, Meghan Fish MA, Michael Brimacombe PhD, BA, MA, MSc, Steven Rogers MD, MPH
{"title":"儿科护理紧急行为健康评估工具的开发与实施。","authors":"Ryan O’Donnell MSN, RN, NEA-BC,&nbsp;Katherine A. Hinderer PhD, RN, CNE, NEA-BC,&nbsp;Daniel Belanger BSN, RN,&nbsp;Danielle Chenard MPH,&nbsp;Erin Boyle BSN, RN,&nbsp;Kevin Borrup DrPH, JD, MPA,&nbsp;Meghan Fish MA,&nbsp;Michael Brimacombe PhD, BA, MA, MSc,&nbsp;Steven Rogers MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The national pediatric mental and behavioral health crisis dramatically increased emergency department mental and behavioral health visits and changed emergency nursing practice. Acuity assessment determines patient severity level and supports appropriate resources and interventions. There are no established nursing tools that assess pediatric mental or behavioral health acuity in the emergency department setting. Our goal was to develop and implement the novel pediatric emergency nurse Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This quality-improvement project used the plan, do, study, act model to design/refine the Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool and a non-experimental descriptive design to assess outcomes. The setting was a 47-bed urban level 1 pediatric trauma center with more than 60,000 annual visits. The team designed the tool using published evidence, emergency nurse feedback, and expert opinion. The tool objectively captured patient acuity and suggested acuity-specific nursing interventions. Project outcomes included acuity, length-of-stay, restraint use, and patient/staff injuries. Analyses included descriptive statistics and correlations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With over 3000 annual mental/behavioral-related visits, the emergency department had an average daily census of 23 mental and behavioral health patients. Implementation occurred in August 2021. The Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool dashboard provided the number of patients, patient location, and acuity. Length-of-stay did not change; however, patient restraint use and patient/staff injuries declined. Number of restraints positively correlated with moderate acuity levels (<em>r</em> = 0.472, <em>P</em> = 0.036).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>For emergency nurses, the Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool provided an objective measure of patient acuity. Targeted interventions can improve the care of this population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Implementation of a Pediatric Nursing Emergency Behavioral Health Assessment Tool\",\"authors\":\"Ryan O’Donnell MSN, RN, NEA-BC,&nbsp;Katherine A. Hinderer PhD, RN, CNE, NEA-BC,&nbsp;Daniel Belanger BSN, RN,&nbsp;Danielle Chenard MPH,&nbsp;Erin Boyle BSN, RN,&nbsp;Kevin Borrup DrPH, JD, MPA,&nbsp;Meghan Fish MA,&nbsp;Michael Brimacombe PhD, BA, MA, MSc,&nbsp;Steven Rogers MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jen.2024.02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The national pediatric mental and behavioral health crisis dramatically increased emergency department mental and behavioral health visits and changed emergency nursing practice. Acuity assessment determines patient severity level and supports appropriate resources and interventions. There are no established nursing tools that assess pediatric mental or behavioral health acuity in the emergency department setting. Our goal was to develop and implement the novel pediatric emergency nurse Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This quality-improvement project used the plan, do, study, act model to design/refine the Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool and a non-experimental descriptive design to assess outcomes. The setting was a 47-bed urban level 1 pediatric trauma center with more than 60,000 annual visits. The team designed the tool using published evidence, emergency nurse feedback, and expert opinion. The tool objectively captured patient acuity and suggested acuity-specific nursing interventions. Project outcomes included acuity, length-of-stay, restraint use, and patient/staff injuries. Analyses included descriptive statistics and correlations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With over 3000 annual mental/behavioral-related visits, the emergency department had an average daily census of 23 mental and behavioral health patients. Implementation occurred in August 2021. The Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool dashboard provided the number of patients, patient location, and acuity. Length-of-stay did not change; however, patient restraint use and patient/staff injuries declined. Number of restraints positively correlated with moderate acuity levels (<em>r</em> = 0.472, <em>P</em> = 0.036).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>For emergency nurses, the Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool provided an objective measure of patient acuity. Targeted interventions can improve the care of this population.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099176724000515\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099176724000515","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言全国儿科精神和行为健康危机大大增加了急诊科精神和行为健康就诊人数,并改变了急诊护理实践。急性期评估可确定患者的严重程度,并为适当的资源和干预措施提供支持。目前还没有成熟的护理工具来评估急诊科环境中儿科精神和行为健康的严重程度。我们的目标是开发并实施新颖的儿科急诊护士急诊行为健康敏锐度评估工具。方法该质量改进项目采用 "计划、实施、研究、行动 "模式来设计/改进急诊行为健康敏锐度评估工具,并采用非实验描述性设计来评估结果。该中心是一家拥有 47 张床位的城市一级儿科创伤中心,每年的就诊人数超过 60,000 人次。团队利用已发表的证据、急诊护士的反馈和专家意见设计了该工具。该工具客观地记录了患者的严重程度,并提出了针对急性期的护理干预建议。项目成果包括急性症状、住院时间、限制措施的使用以及病人/工作人员伤害。分析包括描述性统计和相关性分析。结果急诊科每年有 3000 多名精神/行为相关就诊者,平均每天有 23 名精神和行为健康患者。该项目于 2021 年 8 月开始实施。急诊行为健康严重程度评估工具仪表板提供了患者人数、患者位置和严重程度。住院时间没有发生变化;但是,病人使用束缚措施和病人/工作人员受伤的情况有所减少。对于急诊护士来说,"急诊行为健康严重性评估工具 "提供了患者严重性的客观衡量标准。有针对性的干预措施可以改善对这一人群的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Implementation of a Pediatric Nursing Emergency Behavioral Health Assessment Tool

Introduction

The national pediatric mental and behavioral health crisis dramatically increased emergency department mental and behavioral health visits and changed emergency nursing practice. Acuity assessment determines patient severity level and supports appropriate resources and interventions. There are no established nursing tools that assess pediatric mental or behavioral health acuity in the emergency department setting. Our goal was to develop and implement the novel pediatric emergency nurse Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool.

Methods

This quality-improvement project used the plan, do, study, act model to design/refine the Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool and a non-experimental descriptive design to assess outcomes. The setting was a 47-bed urban level 1 pediatric trauma center with more than 60,000 annual visits. The team designed the tool using published evidence, emergency nurse feedback, and expert opinion. The tool objectively captured patient acuity and suggested acuity-specific nursing interventions. Project outcomes included acuity, length-of-stay, restraint use, and patient/staff injuries. Analyses included descriptive statistics and correlations.

Results

With over 3000 annual mental/behavioral-related visits, the emergency department had an average daily census of 23 mental and behavioral health patients. Implementation occurred in August 2021. The Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool dashboard provided the number of patients, patient location, and acuity. Length-of-stay did not change; however, patient restraint use and patient/staff injuries declined. Number of restraints positively correlated with moderate acuity levels (r = 0.472, P = 0.036).

Discussion

For emergency nurses, the Emergency Behavioral Health Acuity Assessment Tool provided an objective measure of patient acuity. Targeted interventions can improve the care of this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信