David García-Azorín, Cristina Martínez-Badillo, J. Camiña Muñiz, A. Gago-Veiga, Noemi Morollón Sánchez, V. González-Quintanilla, J. Porta-Etessam, Álvaro Sierra-Mencía, N. González-García, Yesica González-Osorio, Marcos Polanco-Fernandez, Andrea Recio-García, Robert Belvís Nieto, Á. Guerrero-Peral
{"title":"坎地沙坦研究:坎地沙坦西班牙偏头痛反应预测和耐受性研究。","authors":"David García-Azorín, Cristina Martínez-Badillo, J. Camiña Muñiz, A. Gago-Veiga, Noemi Morollón Sánchez, V. González-Quintanilla, J. Porta-Etessam, Álvaro Sierra-Mencía, N. González-García, Yesica González-Osorio, Marcos Polanco-Fernandez, Andrea Recio-García, Robert Belvís Nieto, Á. Guerrero-Peral","doi":"10.1177/03331024241248833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nEffectiveness of candesartan in migraine prevention is supported by two randomized controlled trials. We aimed to assess the effectiveness, tolerability, and response predictors of candesartan in the preventive treatment of migraine.\n\n\nMETHODS\nObservational, multicenter, prospective cohort study. The 50%, 75% and 30% responder rates, between weeks 8-12 and 20-24, were compared with the baseline. Treatment emergent adverse effects were systematically evaluated. Response predictors were estimated by multivariate regression models.\n\n\nRESULTS\nEighty-six patients were included, 79.1% females, aged 39.5 (inter-quartile range [IQR] 26.3-50.3), with chronic migraine (43.0%), medication overuse headache (55.8%) and a median of two (inter-quartile range: 0.75-3) prior preventive treatments. At baseline patients had 14 (10-24) headache and 8 (5-11) migraine days per month. The 30%, 50% and 75% responder rates were 40%, 34.9% and 15.1% between weeks 8-12, and 48.8%, 36%, and 18.6% between weeks 20-24. Adverse effects were reported by 30 (34.9%) and 13 (15.1%) patients between weeks 0-12 and 12-24, leading to discontinuation in 15 (17.4%) patients. Chronic migraine, depression, headache days per month, medication overuse headache, and daily headache at baseline predicted the response between weeks 20-24.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nCandesartan effectiveness and tolerability in migraine prevention was in line with the clinical trials' efficacy.Trial registration: The study protocol is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04138316).","PeriodicalId":195255,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache","volume":"68 4","pages":"3331024241248833"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CandeSpartan Study: Candesartan Spanish Response-prediction and Tolerability study in migraine.\",\"authors\":\"David García-Azorín, Cristina Martínez-Badillo, J. Camiña Muñiz, A. Gago-Veiga, Noemi Morollón Sánchez, V. González-Quintanilla, J. Porta-Etessam, Álvaro Sierra-Mencía, N. González-García, Yesica González-Osorio, Marcos Polanco-Fernandez, Andrea Recio-García, Robert Belvís Nieto, Á. Guerrero-Peral\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03331024241248833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nEffectiveness of candesartan in migraine prevention is supported by two randomized controlled trials. We aimed to assess the effectiveness, tolerability, and response predictors of candesartan in the preventive treatment of migraine.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nObservational, multicenter, prospective cohort study. The 50%, 75% and 30% responder rates, between weeks 8-12 and 20-24, were compared with the baseline. Treatment emergent adverse effects were systematically evaluated. Response predictors were estimated by multivariate regression models.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nEighty-six patients were included, 79.1% females, aged 39.5 (inter-quartile range [IQR] 26.3-50.3), with chronic migraine (43.0%), medication overuse headache (55.8%) and a median of two (inter-quartile range: 0.75-3) prior preventive treatments. At baseline patients had 14 (10-24) headache and 8 (5-11) migraine days per month. The 30%, 50% and 75% responder rates were 40%, 34.9% and 15.1% between weeks 8-12, and 48.8%, 36%, and 18.6% between weeks 20-24. Adverse effects were reported by 30 (34.9%) and 13 (15.1%) patients between weeks 0-12 and 12-24, leading to discontinuation in 15 (17.4%) patients. Chronic migraine, depression, headache days per month, medication overuse headache, and daily headache at baseline predicted the response between weeks 20-24.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nCandesartan effectiveness and tolerability in migraine prevention was in line with the clinical trials' efficacy.Trial registration: The study protocol is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04138316).\",\"PeriodicalId\":195255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache\",\"volume\":\"68 4\",\"pages\":\"3331024241248833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024241248833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024241248833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
CandeSpartan Study: Candesartan Spanish Response-prediction and Tolerability study in migraine.
INTRODUCTION
Effectiveness of candesartan in migraine prevention is supported by two randomized controlled trials. We aimed to assess the effectiveness, tolerability, and response predictors of candesartan in the preventive treatment of migraine.
METHODS
Observational, multicenter, prospective cohort study. The 50%, 75% and 30% responder rates, between weeks 8-12 and 20-24, were compared with the baseline. Treatment emergent adverse effects were systematically evaluated. Response predictors were estimated by multivariate regression models.
RESULTS
Eighty-six patients were included, 79.1% females, aged 39.5 (inter-quartile range [IQR] 26.3-50.3), with chronic migraine (43.0%), medication overuse headache (55.8%) and a median of two (inter-quartile range: 0.75-3) prior preventive treatments. At baseline patients had 14 (10-24) headache and 8 (5-11) migraine days per month. The 30%, 50% and 75% responder rates were 40%, 34.9% and 15.1% between weeks 8-12, and 48.8%, 36%, and 18.6% between weeks 20-24. Adverse effects were reported by 30 (34.9%) and 13 (15.1%) patients between weeks 0-12 and 12-24, leading to discontinuation in 15 (17.4%) patients. Chronic migraine, depression, headache days per month, medication overuse headache, and daily headache at baseline predicted the response between weeks 20-24.
CONCLUSION
Candesartan effectiveness and tolerability in migraine prevention was in line with the clinical trials' efficacy.Trial registration: The study protocol is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04138316).