{"title":"抗结石:放射学诊断和手术治疗--临床病例介绍","authors":"Zois-Panagiotis Vlachopanos, Christos Impas, Athanasios Venetis, Evangelos Liapis, Chrysi Papadeli, A. Delantoni","doi":"10.54936/haoms2513141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Antrolith is a pathological calcified mass located in the paranasal sinuses, commonly in the maxillary sinus. When it is found in the vicinity or into the nasal cavity, it is also called rhinolith. In most of the cases, antroliths are incidentally identified through dental patients’ radiological examination. This fact underlines the need of antroliths’ detection in radiographs even by the general dentist. Objective: This paper aims to discuss the clinical and radiological diagnosis of antrolith, as well as its therapeutic methods, through the presentation of two clinical cases. Materials – Methods: Clinical cases, diagnosed with dental panoramic radiographs, radiographs of paranasal sinuses (Water’s view) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), are presented. Moreover, there has been conducted a review of the recent literature with scientific papers published in databases PubMed and Google Scholar. Results: Antrolith is usually an asymptomatic clinical feature, but painful symptomatology is rarely observed. Radiologically, it is mainly diagnosed with accuracy using orthopantomography and CBCT. As a pathological mass, antrolith should be differentiated from dental dysplasias, inflammatory calcifications, foreign bodies, even neoplasms in case of sizeable antroliths. The treatment choices of antroliths, depending on the severity of every clinical case, include frequent medical observation without any intervention or surgical excision techniques, most commonly the endoscopic sinus surgery or the removal through intraoral access. This article refers to two clinical cases of antroliths, one asymptomatic and one painful case, with all the diagnostic and management methodology being discussed. Conclusions: The radiological diagnosis of antroliths in conjunction with the endoscopic sinus surgery for its removal provide with the opportunity to treat and relieve patients with painful symptomatology. It is important not to be missed by the general dentist, as it may appear incidentally when evaluating panoramic radiographs. The assessment of antroliths is crucial for the differential diagnosis and its therapeutic management requires cooperation with a specialist.","PeriodicalId":164809,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Archives of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"42 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antrolith: radiological diagnosis and surgical treatment – presentation of clinical cases\",\"authors\":\"Zois-Panagiotis Vlachopanos, Christos Impas, Athanasios Venetis, Evangelos Liapis, Chrysi Papadeli, A. Delantoni\",\"doi\":\"10.54936/haoms2513141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Antrolith is a pathological calcified mass located in the paranasal sinuses, commonly in the maxillary sinus. When it is found in the vicinity or into the nasal cavity, it is also called rhinolith. In most of the cases, antroliths are incidentally identified through dental patients’ radiological examination. This fact underlines the need of antroliths’ detection in radiographs even by the general dentist. Objective: This paper aims to discuss the clinical and radiological diagnosis of antrolith, as well as its therapeutic methods, through the presentation of two clinical cases. Materials – Methods: Clinical cases, diagnosed with dental panoramic radiographs, radiographs of paranasal sinuses (Water’s view) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), are presented. Moreover, there has been conducted a review of the recent literature with scientific papers published in databases PubMed and Google Scholar. Results: Antrolith is usually an asymptomatic clinical feature, but painful symptomatology is rarely observed. Radiologically, it is mainly diagnosed with accuracy using orthopantomography and CBCT. As a pathological mass, antrolith should be differentiated from dental dysplasias, inflammatory calcifications, foreign bodies, even neoplasms in case of sizeable antroliths. The treatment choices of antroliths, depending on the severity of every clinical case, include frequent medical observation without any intervention or surgical excision techniques, most commonly the endoscopic sinus surgery or the removal through intraoral access. This article refers to two clinical cases of antroliths, one asymptomatic and one painful case, with all the diagnostic and management methodology being discussed. Conclusions: The radiological diagnosis of antroliths in conjunction with the endoscopic sinus surgery for its removal provide with the opportunity to treat and relieve patients with painful symptomatology. It is important not to be missed by the general dentist, as it may appear incidentally when evaluating panoramic radiographs. The assessment of antroliths is crucial for the differential diagnosis and its therapeutic management requires cooperation with a specialist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic Archives of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"42 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic Archives of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54936/haoms2513141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Archives of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54936/haoms2513141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介抗结石是位于副鼻窦的病理性钙化肿块,常见于上颌窦。当它出现在鼻腔附近或进入鼻腔时,也被称为鼻石。大多数情况下,抗结石是通过牙科患者的放射检查偶然发现的。这一事实突出表明,即使是普通牙医,也有必要在射线照片中发现抗结石。目的:本文旨在通过介绍两个临床病例,讨论抗结石的临床和放射学诊断及其治疗方法。材料-方法:通过牙科全景X光片、副鼻窦X光片(Water's view)和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)对临床病例进行诊断。此外,还对最近发表在 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 数据库中的科学论文进行了综述。研究结果抗结石通常是一种无症状的临床特征,但很少观察到疼痛症状。在放射学上,主要通过正侧位影像学和 CBCT 进行准确诊断。作为一种病理肿块,抗结石应与牙齿发育不良、炎性钙化、异物,甚至是体积较大的肿瘤相鉴别。根据每个临床病例的严重程度,抗结石的治疗选择包括经常性的医学观察而不采取任何干预措施,或外科切除技术,最常见的是内窥镜鼻窦手术或通过口腔内入路切除。本文介绍了两例临床抗结石病例,一例为无症状病例,一例为疼痛病例,并讨论了所有的诊断和处理方法。结论:抗结石的放射学诊断与内窥镜鼻窦手术切除相结合,为治疗和缓解有疼痛症状的患者提供了机会。普通牙医一定不能漏诊,因为在评估全景 X 光片时可能会偶然发现。抗结石的评估对于鉴别诊断至关重要,其治疗管理需要与专科医生合作。
Antrolith: radiological diagnosis and surgical treatment – presentation of clinical cases
Introduction: Antrolith is a pathological calcified mass located in the paranasal sinuses, commonly in the maxillary sinus. When it is found in the vicinity or into the nasal cavity, it is also called rhinolith. In most of the cases, antroliths are incidentally identified through dental patients’ radiological examination. This fact underlines the need of antroliths’ detection in radiographs even by the general dentist. Objective: This paper aims to discuss the clinical and radiological diagnosis of antrolith, as well as its therapeutic methods, through the presentation of two clinical cases. Materials – Methods: Clinical cases, diagnosed with dental panoramic radiographs, radiographs of paranasal sinuses (Water’s view) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), are presented. Moreover, there has been conducted a review of the recent literature with scientific papers published in databases PubMed and Google Scholar. Results: Antrolith is usually an asymptomatic clinical feature, but painful symptomatology is rarely observed. Radiologically, it is mainly diagnosed with accuracy using orthopantomography and CBCT. As a pathological mass, antrolith should be differentiated from dental dysplasias, inflammatory calcifications, foreign bodies, even neoplasms in case of sizeable antroliths. The treatment choices of antroliths, depending on the severity of every clinical case, include frequent medical observation without any intervention or surgical excision techniques, most commonly the endoscopic sinus surgery or the removal through intraoral access. This article refers to two clinical cases of antroliths, one asymptomatic and one painful case, with all the diagnostic and management methodology being discussed. Conclusions: The radiological diagnosis of antroliths in conjunction with the endoscopic sinus surgery for its removal provide with the opportunity to treat and relieve patients with painful symptomatology. It is important not to be missed by the general dentist, as it may appear incidentally when evaluating panoramic radiographs. The assessment of antroliths is crucial for the differential diagnosis and its therapeutic management requires cooperation with a specialist.