补体抑制剂抑制补体介导的Arthus反应位点血管损伤。

S S Asghar, K P Dingemans, A Kammeijer, W R Faber, M Y Abdel Mawla
{"title":"补体抑制剂抑制补体介导的Arthus反应位点血管损伤。","authors":"S S Asghar,&nbsp;K P Dingemans,&nbsp;A Kammeijer,&nbsp;W R Faber,&nbsp;M Y Abdel Mawla","doi":"10.1159/000467876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Certain complement inhibitors, namely chlorpromazine, suramin, 2-hydroxystilbamidine and chlorophenothiazine sulphonate were tested for their ability to suppress complement deposition and vascular injury at the site of an Arthus reaction. Deposition of complement was suppressed in the order 2-hydroxystilbamidine greater than suramin greater than chlorpromazine. All the above mentioned four compounds strongly protected vascular injury as observed by electron microscopic studies. At Arthus reaction sites prepared without drug treatment venules ranged from normal to severely altered and damaged. Discontinuities in endothelial linings varied from small to longer stretches. In the latter situation remaining endothelial cells were degenerated and endothelial remnants did not have an intact basal lamina. After treatment with the above complement inhibitors, at arthus reaction sites some venules appeared normal, whereas others were altered but in all cases the endothelium and its basal lamina remained intact.</p>","PeriodicalId":77697,"journal":{"name":"Complement (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"3 1","pages":"40-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000467876","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suppression of complement-mediated vascular injury at Arthus reaction sites by complement inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"S S Asghar,&nbsp;K P Dingemans,&nbsp;A Kammeijer,&nbsp;W R Faber,&nbsp;M Y Abdel Mawla\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000467876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Certain complement inhibitors, namely chlorpromazine, suramin, 2-hydroxystilbamidine and chlorophenothiazine sulphonate were tested for their ability to suppress complement deposition and vascular injury at the site of an Arthus reaction. Deposition of complement was suppressed in the order 2-hydroxystilbamidine greater than suramin greater than chlorpromazine. All the above mentioned four compounds strongly protected vascular injury as observed by electron microscopic studies. At Arthus reaction sites prepared without drug treatment venules ranged from normal to severely altered and damaged. Discontinuities in endothelial linings varied from small to longer stretches. In the latter situation remaining endothelial cells were degenerated and endothelial remnants did not have an intact basal lamina. After treatment with the above complement inhibitors, at arthus reaction sites some venules appeared normal, whereas others were altered but in all cases the endothelium and its basal lamina remained intact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complement (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"40-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000467876\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complement (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000467876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complement (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000467876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

某些补体抑制剂,即氯丙嗪、苏拉明、2-羟基苯胺和氯吩噻嗪磺酸盐,被测试其抑制补体沉积和Arthus反应部位血管损伤的能力。补体沉积被抑制的顺序为:2-羟基二苯胺大于苏拉明,大于氯丙嗪。电镜观察发现,上述四种化合物对血管损伤均有较强的保护作用。在没有药物治疗的Arthus反应部位,小静脉从正常到严重改变和损伤不等。内皮细胞内膜的不连续性从小到长不等。在后一种情况下,剩余的内皮细胞变性,内皮残余物没有完整的基板。在用上述补体抑制剂治疗后,在arthus反应部位,一些小静脉看起来正常,而另一些则发生了改变,但在所有病例中,内皮及其基底层都保持完整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suppression of complement-mediated vascular injury at Arthus reaction sites by complement inhibitors.

Certain complement inhibitors, namely chlorpromazine, suramin, 2-hydroxystilbamidine and chlorophenothiazine sulphonate were tested for their ability to suppress complement deposition and vascular injury at the site of an Arthus reaction. Deposition of complement was suppressed in the order 2-hydroxystilbamidine greater than suramin greater than chlorpromazine. All the above mentioned four compounds strongly protected vascular injury as observed by electron microscopic studies. At Arthus reaction sites prepared without drug treatment venules ranged from normal to severely altered and damaged. Discontinuities in endothelial linings varied from small to longer stretches. In the latter situation remaining endothelial cells were degenerated and endothelial remnants did not have an intact basal lamina. After treatment with the above complement inhibitors, at arthus reaction sites some venules appeared normal, whereas others were altered but in all cases the endothelium and its basal lamina remained intact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信