517 制定新的机构政策,减少不可接受的行为和管理扰乱研究的参与者

Simona Kwon, Amanda Bunting, Helen Panageas, Joan Margiotta, Kimberly Diaz, Gregory Laynor, James Holahan, SUsan Andersen
{"title":"517 制定新的机构政策,减少不可接受的行为和管理扰乱研究的参与者","authors":"Simona Kwon, Amanda Bunting, Helen Panageas, Joan Margiotta, Kimberly Diaz, Gregory Laynor, James Holahan, SUsan Andersen","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In a 2022 NASEM Report, “… successful inclusion of underrepresented populations in research is investing in diverse research teams to enhance congruence and to optimize recruitment and retention success.” Thus, academic research institutions must provide safe, respectful and inclusive work environments to support diverse research teams. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Resources, policies and protocols related to disruptive research participants have not been well articulated at our institution. Given this dearth of information, we launched a new initiative across our CTSA, IRB, Office of General Counsel and Department of Population Health. The multipronged approach includes: 1) Conduct a scoping review of published and gray literature to identify best practices, trainings and resources to mitigate discrimination, harassment of research team members; 2) Co-develop new institutional policies and procedures to ensure safety and respect for both research staff and participants; 3) Develop an online training on research team field and workplace safety; and 4) Widely disseminate policies and resources to address the overall gap in academic research. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Our ongoing scoping review has shown that here is an overall lack of information on bias, discrimination and harassment perpetrated by research participants towards research teams. Based on our activities, new Human Research Protection policies were launched. These include defining what disruptive participant behavior in research is, the introduction of a Statement on the Conduct of Participants in Research Studies, and steps study teams may implement to manage disruptive behavior initiated by a research participate. Next steps include the development of training resources for study teams on the new policies and to introduce de-escalation and situational awareness strategies and trainings. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: As research teams become increasingly diverse, there is a need to better support them and ensure that the research field and work settings are safe, inclusive environments with articulated policies that mitigate/prevent discrimination, bias and harassment perpetrated by study participants.","PeriodicalId":508693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"334 1","pages":"153 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"517 The Development of New Institutional Policies on Mitigating Unacceptable Behavior and Managing Disruptive Research Participants\",\"authors\":\"Simona Kwon, Amanda Bunting, Helen Panageas, Joan Margiotta, Kimberly Diaz, Gregory Laynor, James Holahan, SUsan Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cts.2024.440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In a 2022 NASEM Report, “… successful inclusion of underrepresented populations in research is investing in diverse research teams to enhance congruence and to optimize recruitment and retention success.” Thus, academic research institutions must provide safe, respectful and inclusive work environments to support diverse research teams. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Resources, policies and protocols related to disruptive research participants have not been well articulated at our institution. Given this dearth of information, we launched a new initiative across our CTSA, IRB, Office of General Counsel and Department of Population Health. The multipronged approach includes: 1) Conduct a scoping review of published and gray literature to identify best practices, trainings and resources to mitigate discrimination, harassment of research team members; 2) Co-develop new institutional policies and procedures to ensure safety and respect for both research staff and participants; 3) Develop an online training on research team field and workplace safety; and 4) Widely disseminate policies and resources to address the overall gap in academic research. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Our ongoing scoping review has shown that here is an overall lack of information on bias, discrimination and harassment perpetrated by research participants towards research teams. Based on our activities, new Human Research Protection policies were launched. These include defining what disruptive participant behavior in research is, the introduction of a Statement on the Conduct of Participants in Research Studies, and steps study teams may implement to manage disruptive behavior initiated by a research participate. Next steps include the development of training resources for study teams on the new policies and to introduce de-escalation and situational awareness strategies and trainings. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: As research teams become increasingly diverse, there is a need to better support them and ensure that the research field and work settings are safe, inclusive environments with articulated policies that mitigate/prevent discrimination, bias and harassment perpetrated by study participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"334 1\",\"pages\":\"153 - 154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标/目的:在一份 2022 年的 NASEM 报告中,"......成功地将代表性不足的人群纳入研究领域,就是对多元化研究团队进行投资,以增强一致性并优化招聘和留任的成功率"。因此,学术研究机构必须提供安全、尊重和包容的工作环境,以支持多元化的研究团队。方法/研究对象:在我们的机构中,与破坏性研究参与者相关的资源、政策和协议还没有得到很好的阐述。鉴于这种信息匮乏的情况,我们在 CTSA、IRB、总法律顾问办公室和人口健康部发起了一项新倡议。多管齐下的方法包括1) 对已发表的文献和灰色文献进行范围审查,以确定最佳实践、培训和资源,从而减少对研究团队成员的歧视和骚扰;2) 共同制定新的机构政策和程序,以确保研究人员和参与者的安全和尊重;3) 开发有关研究团队现场和工作场所安全的在线培训;以及 4) 广泛传播政策和资源,以解决学术研究中的整体差距。结果/预期结果:我们正在进行的范围审查显示,目前总体上缺乏有关研究参与者对研究团队的偏见、歧视和骚扰的信息。根据我们的活动,推出了新的人类研究保护政策。这些政策包括定义什么是研究中的破坏性参与者行为,引入《研究参与者行为声明》,以及研究团队可以采取哪些步骤来管理由研究参与者引发的破坏性行为。接下来的步骤包括为研究团队开发有关新政策的培训资源,并引入缓和和情境意识策略和培训。讨论/意义:随着研究团队日益多元化,有必要为他们提供更好的支持,并确保研究领域和工作环境安全、包容,同时制定明确的政策,以减轻/防止研究参与者的歧视、偏见和骚扰行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
517 The Development of New Institutional Policies on Mitigating Unacceptable Behavior and Managing Disruptive Research Participants
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In a 2022 NASEM Report, “… successful inclusion of underrepresented populations in research is investing in diverse research teams to enhance congruence and to optimize recruitment and retention success.” Thus, academic research institutions must provide safe, respectful and inclusive work environments to support diverse research teams. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Resources, policies and protocols related to disruptive research participants have not been well articulated at our institution. Given this dearth of information, we launched a new initiative across our CTSA, IRB, Office of General Counsel and Department of Population Health. The multipronged approach includes: 1) Conduct a scoping review of published and gray literature to identify best practices, trainings and resources to mitigate discrimination, harassment of research team members; 2) Co-develop new institutional policies and procedures to ensure safety and respect for both research staff and participants; 3) Develop an online training on research team field and workplace safety; and 4) Widely disseminate policies and resources to address the overall gap in academic research. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Our ongoing scoping review has shown that here is an overall lack of information on bias, discrimination and harassment perpetrated by research participants towards research teams. Based on our activities, new Human Research Protection policies were launched. These include defining what disruptive participant behavior in research is, the introduction of a Statement on the Conduct of Participants in Research Studies, and steps study teams may implement to manage disruptive behavior initiated by a research participate. Next steps include the development of training resources for study teams on the new policies and to introduce de-escalation and situational awareness strategies and trainings. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: As research teams become increasingly diverse, there is a need to better support them and ensure that the research field and work settings are safe, inclusive environments with articulated policies that mitigate/prevent discrimination, bias and harassment perpetrated by study participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信