{"title":"让人耳目一新的、必要的创伤暴露疗法:评论 Rubenstein 等人(2024 年)。","authors":"Laura S Brown","doi":"10.1037/amp0001241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this invited commentary, I address what I see as the major contributions Rubenstein et al. (2024) have made to challenging the hegemony of exposure therapies for trauma-exposed persons. These include a thorough review of the history of the rise of exposure therapies, the identification of posttrauma responses as forms of anxiety disorders, and an extensive discussion of the neurobiology of the trauma response. Additionally, Rubenstein et al. expose the very high dropout rates in studies of exposure therapies and ways in which many traumatized people have not found them helpful. This article brings the so-called \"gold standard\" back to its rightful position as one possible, occasionally helpful way of assisting some, but not all, traumatized people. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":217617,"journal":{"name":"The American psychologist","volume":"4 ","pages":"344-346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refreshing, necessary exposure to the problem with exposure therapies for trauma: Commentary on Rubenstein et al. (2024).\",\"authors\":\"Laura S Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/amp0001241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this invited commentary, I address what I see as the major contributions Rubenstein et al. (2024) have made to challenging the hegemony of exposure therapies for trauma-exposed persons. These include a thorough review of the history of the rise of exposure therapies, the identification of posttrauma responses as forms of anxiety disorders, and an extensive discussion of the neurobiology of the trauma response. Additionally, Rubenstein et al. expose the very high dropout rates in studies of exposure therapies and ways in which many traumatized people have not found them helpful. This article brings the so-called \\\"gold standard\\\" back to its rightful position as one possible, occasionally helpful way of assisting some, but not all, traumatized people. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":217617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American psychologist\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"344-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American psychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这篇特约评论中,我将论述鲁宾斯坦等人(2024 年)在挑战暴露疗法对受创伤者的霸权方面做出的主要贡献。其中包括对暴露疗法兴起历史的全面回顾、将创伤后反应确定为焦虑症的形式,以及对创伤反应神经生物学的广泛讨论。此外,鲁宾斯坦等人还揭露了暴露疗法研究中的高辍学率,以及许多受创伤者认为暴露疗法没有帮助的方式。这篇文章让所谓的 "黄金标准 "重新回到其应有的位置,成为帮助某些(而非所有)受创伤者的一种可能的、偶尔有用的方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
Refreshing, necessary exposure to the problem with exposure therapies for trauma: Commentary on Rubenstein et al. (2024).
In this invited commentary, I address what I see as the major contributions Rubenstein et al. (2024) have made to challenging the hegemony of exposure therapies for trauma-exposed persons. These include a thorough review of the history of the rise of exposure therapies, the identification of posttrauma responses as forms of anxiety disorders, and an extensive discussion of the neurobiology of the trauma response. Additionally, Rubenstein et al. expose the very high dropout rates in studies of exposure therapies and ways in which many traumatized people have not found them helpful. This article brings the so-called "gold standard" back to its rightful position as one possible, occasionally helpful way of assisting some, but not all, traumatized people. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).