门诊与住院机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的手术效果比较:系统回顾与元分析

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Tuan T. Nguyen , Muhammed A. Moukhtar Hammad , Ryan W. Dobbs , Huy G. Vuong , Jacob Basilius , Khoa Quy , Hanh T.T. Ngo , An Nguyen , Thi Tuyet Mai Tran , Narmina Khanmammadova , Trinh N.K. Van , Sohrab N. Ali , Ho Yee Tiong , Se Young Choi , Mohammed Shahait , David I. Lee
{"title":"门诊与住院机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的手术效果比较:系统回顾与元分析","authors":"Tuan T. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Muhammed A. Moukhtar Hammad ,&nbsp;Ryan W. Dobbs ,&nbsp;Huy G. Vuong ,&nbsp;Jacob Basilius ,&nbsp;Khoa Quy ,&nbsp;Hanh T.T. Ngo ,&nbsp;An Nguyen ,&nbsp;Thi Tuyet Mai Tran ,&nbsp;Narmina Khanmammadova ,&nbsp;Trinh N.K. Van ,&nbsp;Sohrab N. Ali ,&nbsp;Ho Yee Tiong ,&nbsp;Se Young Choi ,&nbsp;Mohammed Shahait ,&nbsp;David I. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Several institutions have reported their experience with outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (O-RARP). However, it is unclear if the utilization of this approach represents an improvement over inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (I-RARP). This meta-analysis sought to compare the surgical outcomes between O-RARP and I-RARP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>For relevant articles, three electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched from their inception until April 30, 2022. A meta-analysis has been reported in line with PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (MD) were applied for the comparison of dichotomous and continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>of the 297 retrieved abstracts, 12 underwent full-text review, and 11 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total cohort of 2,875 cases of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (892 O-RARP cases and 1,983 I-RARP cases). Compared to I-RARP, the O-RARP group had lower mean operative time (MD = −9.4 minutes, 95% CI −15.1 to −3.7, <em>P</em> = 0.001), fewer overall postoperative complications (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.92, <em>P</em> = 0.017), shorter hospital stay (MD = −22.9 hours, 95% CI −26.0 to −19.7, <em>P</em> ≤ 0.001), and lower postoperative opioid requirements (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.71, <em>P</em> = 0.001). There were no significant differences in other outcomes, including: estimated blood loss, postoperative pain score, unscheduled visits after surgery, positive surgical margins, biochemical recurrence, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after surgery, or three- and six-month continence rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This meta-analysis demonstrates that O-RARP is a safe and feasible option for patients undergoing surgery for localized prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to better evaluate optimal patient selection, associated healthcare costs, and patient-reported outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"13 1","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of surgical outcomes between outpatient and inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Tuan T. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Muhammed A. Moukhtar Hammad ,&nbsp;Ryan W. Dobbs ,&nbsp;Huy G. Vuong ,&nbsp;Jacob Basilius ,&nbsp;Khoa Quy ,&nbsp;Hanh T.T. Ngo ,&nbsp;An Nguyen ,&nbsp;Thi Tuyet Mai Tran ,&nbsp;Narmina Khanmammadova ,&nbsp;Trinh N.K. Van ,&nbsp;Sohrab N. Ali ,&nbsp;Ho Yee Tiong ,&nbsp;Se Young Choi ,&nbsp;Mohammed Shahait ,&nbsp;David I. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Several institutions have reported their experience with outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (O-RARP). However, it is unclear if the utilization of this approach represents an improvement over inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (I-RARP). This meta-analysis sought to compare the surgical outcomes between O-RARP and I-RARP.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>For relevant articles, three electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched from their inception until April 30, 2022. A meta-analysis has been reported in line with PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (MD) were applied for the comparison of dichotomous and continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>of the 297 retrieved abstracts, 12 underwent full-text review, and 11 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total cohort of 2,875 cases of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (892 O-RARP cases and 1,983 I-RARP cases). Compared to I-RARP, the O-RARP group had lower mean operative time (MD = −9.4 minutes, 95% CI −15.1 to −3.7, <em>P</em> = 0.001), fewer overall postoperative complications (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.92, <em>P</em> = 0.017), shorter hospital stay (MD = −22.9 hours, 95% CI −26.0 to −19.7, <em>P</em> ≤ 0.001), and lower postoperative opioid requirements (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.71, <em>P</em> = 0.001). There were no significant differences in other outcomes, including: estimated blood loss, postoperative pain score, unscheduled visits after surgery, positive surgical margins, biochemical recurrence, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after surgery, or three- and six-month continence rates.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This meta-analysis demonstrates that O-RARP is a safe and feasible option for patients undergoing surgery for localized prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to better evaluate optimal patient selection, associated healthcare costs, and patient-reported outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate International\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S228788822400028X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S228788822400028X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of surgical outcomes between outpatient and inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Several institutions have reported their experience with outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (O-RARP). However, it is unclear if the utilization of this approach represents an improvement over inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (I-RARP). This meta-analysis sought to compare the surgical outcomes between O-RARP and I-RARP.

Methods

For relevant articles, three electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched from their inception until April 30, 2022. A meta-analysis has been reported in line with PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (MD) were applied for the comparison of dichotomous and continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

of the 297 retrieved abstracts, 12 underwent full-text review, and 11 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total cohort of 2,875 cases of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (892 O-RARP cases and 1,983 I-RARP cases). Compared to I-RARP, the O-RARP group had lower mean operative time (MD = −9.4 minutes, 95% CI −15.1 to −3.7, P = 0.001), fewer overall postoperative complications (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.92, P = 0.017), shorter hospital stay (MD = −22.9 hours, 95% CI −26.0 to −19.7, P ≤ 0.001), and lower postoperative opioid requirements (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.71, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in other outcomes, including: estimated blood loss, postoperative pain score, unscheduled visits after surgery, positive surgical margins, biochemical recurrence, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after surgery, or three- and six-month continence rates.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrates that O-RARP is a safe and feasible option for patients undergoing surgery for localized prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to better evaluate optimal patient selection, associated healthcare costs, and patient-reported outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信