认证对印度注册伦理委员会质量和管理的影响:横向研究

Q2 Medicine
G. Dakhale, M. Kalikar, A. Giradkar
{"title":"认证对印度注册伦理委员会质量和管理的影响:横向研究","authors":"G. Dakhale, M. Kalikar, A. Giradkar","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_153_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Ethics Committee accreditation is a process to assess the performance against a set of standards. Very few studies have shown that process of accreditation results in the improvement of the overall functioning of ECs. in terms of quality and governance. Hence, the present study was planned to evaluate the impact of accreditation on registered EC in terms of quality and governance and to compare functioning of accredited versus non accredited EC in terms of quality and governance.\n \n \n \n This was a cross sectional, observational, questionnaire-based survey conducted on 28 registered Ethics Committee in India after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee.\n \n \n \n Accredited EC’s (n = 12) were compared for NABH standard for accreditation before and after accreditation in terms of percentage. It was found that majority of the standards related to structure and composition, adherence to specific policies , completeness of review and after approval process were met by majority of EC’s after accreditation. Only a few EC ‘s fulfilled some of the criteria before accreditation. There was a statistically significant difference with reference to adherence to specific policies by accredited and non-accredited EC’s like updating SOP according to changing requirements (P < 0.0237), process for preparing SOP (P < 0.0237), categorization of review process mentioned in SOP (P < 0.0237) procedure to be followed for vulnerable population (P < 0.0103) , process of handling issues related to complaints by participants and other stakeholders violation (P < 0.0103) etc.\n \n \n \n Accreditation results in improving of EC functioning in terms of quality and governance.\n","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of accreditation on registered ethics committees in terms of quality and governance in India: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"G. Dakhale, M. Kalikar, A. Giradkar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/picr.picr_153_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Ethics Committee accreditation is a process to assess the performance against a set of standards. Very few studies have shown that process of accreditation results in the improvement of the overall functioning of ECs. in terms of quality and governance. Hence, the present study was planned to evaluate the impact of accreditation on registered EC in terms of quality and governance and to compare functioning of accredited versus non accredited EC in terms of quality and governance.\\n \\n \\n \\n This was a cross sectional, observational, questionnaire-based survey conducted on 28 registered Ethics Committee in India after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee.\\n \\n \\n \\n Accredited EC’s (n = 12) were compared for NABH standard for accreditation before and after accreditation in terms of percentage. It was found that majority of the standards related to structure and composition, adherence to specific policies , completeness of review and after approval process were met by majority of EC’s after accreditation. Only a few EC ‘s fulfilled some of the criteria before accreditation. There was a statistically significant difference with reference to adherence to specific policies by accredited and non-accredited EC’s like updating SOP according to changing requirements (P < 0.0237), process for preparing SOP (P < 0.0237), categorization of review process mentioned in SOP (P < 0.0237) procedure to be followed for vulnerable population (P < 0.0103) , process of handling issues related to complaints by participants and other stakeholders violation (P < 0.0103) etc.\\n \\n \\n \\n Accreditation results in improving of EC functioning in terms of quality and governance.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":20015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Clinical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_153_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_153_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

道德操守委员会认证是根据一套标准评估其绩效的过程。很少有研究表明,认证过程能改善伦理委员会在质量和管理方面的整体运作。因此,本研究计划从质量和管理方面评估资格认证对注册选委会的影响,并从质量和管理方面比较通过资格认证和未通过资格认证的选委会的运作情况。 这是一项横断面、观察性、问卷调查,在获得机构伦理委员会批准后,对印度 28 个注册伦理委员会进行了调查。 对获得认证的伦理委员会(n = 12)在获得认证前后的 NABH 认证标准进行了百分比比较。结果发现,大多数伦理委员会在通过鉴定后都达到了与结构和组成、遵守特定政策、审查完整性和批准后流程有关的标准。只有少数教委在评审前达到了部分标准。经评审和未经评审的教委在遵守具体政策方面存在显著差异,如根据不断变化的要求更新标准操作程序(P < 0.0237)、编写标准操作程序的过程(P < 0.0237)、标准操作程序中提及的审查过程分类(P < 0.0237)、弱势人群应遵循的程序(P < 0.0103)、处理与参与者和其他利益相关者违规投诉有关的问题的过程(P < 0.0103)等。 评审结果改善了教委在质量和管理方面的运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of accreditation on registered ethics committees in terms of quality and governance in India: A cross-sectional study
Ethics Committee accreditation is a process to assess the performance against a set of standards. Very few studies have shown that process of accreditation results in the improvement of the overall functioning of ECs. in terms of quality and governance. Hence, the present study was planned to evaluate the impact of accreditation on registered EC in terms of quality and governance and to compare functioning of accredited versus non accredited EC in terms of quality and governance. This was a cross sectional, observational, questionnaire-based survey conducted on 28 registered Ethics Committee in India after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Accredited EC’s (n = 12) were compared for NABH standard for accreditation before and after accreditation in terms of percentage. It was found that majority of the standards related to structure and composition, adherence to specific policies , completeness of review and after approval process were met by majority of EC’s after accreditation. Only a few EC ‘s fulfilled some of the criteria before accreditation. There was a statistically significant difference with reference to adherence to specific policies by accredited and non-accredited EC’s like updating SOP according to changing requirements (P < 0.0237), process for preparing SOP (P < 0.0237), categorization of review process mentioned in SOP (P < 0.0237) procedure to be followed for vulnerable population (P < 0.0103) , process of handling issues related to complaints by participants and other stakeholders violation (P < 0.0103) etc. Accreditation results in improving of EC functioning in terms of quality and governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Clinical Research
Perspectives in Clinical Research Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer review quarterly journal is positioned to build a learning clinical research community in India. This scientific journal will have a broad coverage of topics across clinical research disciplines including clinical research methodology, research ethics, clinical data management, training, data management, biostatistics, regulatory and will include original articles, reviews, news and views, perspectives, and other interesting sections. PICR will offer all clinical research stakeholders in India – academicians, ethics committees, regulators, and industry professionals -a forum for exchange of ideas, information and opinions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信